... just 8 accusers.
What 16 years of age not young enough for you Cannuck
[youtube]trjO9e9YOtA[/youtube]
Lots of pedophile lovers on CanadianContent.net these days..
I'm sorry for embarrassing you but it need not happen if you hadn't used words that you didn't understand.
Walter's on the prowl again.
Is it in keeping with your Christian beliefs to be a liar?
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person with lascivious intent to entice, allure, persuade, or invite, or attempt to entice, allure, persuade, or invite, any child under 16 years of age to enter any vehicle, room, house, office, or other place for the purpose of proposing to such child the performance of an act of sexual intercourse or an act which constitutes the offense of sodomy or for the purpose of proposing the fondling or feeling of the sexual or genital parts of such child or the breast of such child, or for the purpose of committing an aggravated assault on such child, or for the purpose of proposing that such child fondle or feel the sexual or genital parts of such person.
(b) A violation of this section is a Class C felony.
Alabama Code 13A-6-69.
And in case you're wondering, a Class C felony is one to ten inside.
I believe all of this falls within the Statutes of Limitations for both criminal and civil prosecution.
You think so, huh? First off, there is other evidence (which I suppose is what you mean by "independent verification." Second, Alabama has a long history of convicting men for sex crimes based on nothing but the word of the alleged victim.On top of which there has to be independent verification of crimes for wich the only evidence is 'she said/he said'.
And despite your desperate attempts to conflate a Senate election with a criminal trial, it ain't gonna wash. Nobody, but nobody, is talking about criminally prosecuting Roy Moore. They are talking about whether he is fit to be a senator.And despite what CNN and the Washington Post tells you, crimes have to be proved. Otherwise the supposed perpertrator is presumed innocent.
I'm sorry you consider using words properly and understanding their definitions, unintelligent.
Loretta Lynn? That was the 40s?
More recent reports indicate she was actually 15 - legal in that state in that era if done with parental consent.
Never saw the movie, myself.
No doubt you did.