I think Trump might have overplayed his hand on this one.
I think he's trolling the fuk out of his opposition
I think Trump might have overplayed his hand on this one.
I think he's trolling the fuk out of his opposition
Good luck with that Angstrom...
Trump could pick Comey’s replacement by next week — and it could be the FBI’s first female director
It will be funny to watch progressives make up a reason why it was a bad idea. Im sure there will be something since Trump.
So, if everyone that you don't agree with is a "progressive", logically, that makes you a "regressive".
In any sort of enterprise or endeavour, there's always rats that will jump ship!
So, if everyone that you don't agree with is a "progressive", logically, that makes you a "regressive".
I think Trump has to rely on his better instincts and not be put on the defensive by the political and media establishment.
He's got some workable and revolutionary ideas (in relation to the accepted truths of the contemporary paradigm) on the nation state, trade, money, society. They are poorly articulated, but i see his instincts lead him to some fundamental principles in economy and culture. Trump is an iconoclast, a pragmatist and a true original.. not a slave to ideologies. It'll take him a while to settle in, but he'll come around.
I think Trump fired Comey because he doesn't trust him, and thinks he might be a political hatchet man for his opponents instead of an honest broker. I tend to have a higher opinion of him than Trump, but that's why he was sacked.
Given the spurious concoction and the political axe job that is being wielded against Trump, i doubt Comey could have done much damage even if Trump's impression was valid, given the tawdry weaponry with which he had been provided.
And I am NOT a harbinger and supporter of the Apocalypse (nor a national-socialist/ Christo-fascist :roll. If i was one, i'd welcome the likes of Hillary Clinton/ Justin Trudeau/ Emmanuel Macron/ Angela Merkel and cohort in leading West into catastrophic civilizational collapse. I still hold some hope for salvage of Western Civilization, which is under attack from within and without (but most corrosively from within).
They didn't do it directly. They did i indirectly Just consider the fact that Hillary was actually winning..........until a couple of things happened. These happenings affected the thinking of the voters. ..many of won were going to vote for Hilary but decided to hold their nose and vote for trump based on the revelations that have indirect and direct connections with Russia. It was voter influence from these leak's that affected the elections. The voters made their choice in a reactive manner ......reacting to the info leaked about Hillary that was "suggestive" not factual........... and with Trump calling her names in his boorish non classy manner...... along with voter suggestibility. Trump won What they do is influence the voters by spreading ;misinformation , false news, and confusion... sowing doubt about a specific candidate. It is more of their mind game effectiveness. Let's not forget that Trump invited Russia to see what they could do to h;help him. ( Not a direct quote) The voters involved allowed themselves t o be influenced by the mis/ dis information probably because they wanted to buy into Trumps BS and promises. Many of whom were primarily interested in jobs........ for themselves ..and not thinking of what is best for the whole country.Now they have a government that governs by Twitter.Has anyone figured out how Russia threw the election yet?
They didn't do it directly. They did i indirectly Just consider the fact that Hillary was actually winning..........until a couple of things happened. These happenings affected the thinking of the voters. ..many of won were going to vote for Hilary but decided to hold their nose and vote for trump based on the revelations that have indirect and direct connections with Russia. It was voter influence from these leak's that affected the elections. The voters made their choice in a reactive manner ......reacting to the info leaked about Hillary that was "suggestive" not factual........... and with Trump calling her names in his boorish non classy manner...... along with voter suggestibility. Trump won What they do is influence the voters by spreading ;misinformation , false news, and confusion... sowing doubt about a specific candidate. It is more of their mind game effectiveness. Let's not forget that Trump invited Russia to see what they could do to h;help him. ( Not a direct quote) The voters involved allowed themselves t o be influenced by the mis/ dis information probably because they wanted to buy into Trumps BS and promises. Many of whom were primarily interested in jobs........ for themselves ..and not thinking of what is best for the whole country.Now they have a government that governs by Twitter.
The important question is: (IMHO) WHO was better QUALIFIED???Possibly NOT! What you mentioned was likely balanced off by Hillary supporters who made a concerted effort to balance the vote.
PS.......The voters were manipulated by Russia's hackers who gave info to Wikileaks and the rest is history. Except as evidenced by the current town hall meetings many of these same voters (Trump supporter) are now angry.
.
The important question is: (IMHO) WHO was better QUALIFIED???
Didn't say Russia was behind what Comeydid. If they were influencing the FBI..........then the US is in more trouble than appears . Comey did his sloppy thing about the investigation into the emails etc. It was wIKIlEAKS that released a lot of data about emails etc that did not favor Hillary. Hillary is not blameless. No one said she is. Her personnel was hacked as you might recall. and then the info ends up in public view via Wiki leak Trump proclaims hi s love for Wikileaks. as it was working in his favor.Get a grip :laughing3:
Trump...................thicker skin for starters!
Donald Trump's Financial Ties to Russian Oligarchs and Mobsters Detailed In Explosive New Documentary from the Netherlands
Dutch TV did what no American TV network dares, suggesting Trump's past includes illegal racketeering.
In that case, he's completely screwed!I think Trump has to rely on his better instincts and not be put on the defensive by the political and media establishment.
..and then some. ;-)In that case, he's completely screwed!