I don't know where to start with that response. It's jumbled up.
"...we are on the eve of a major conflict and we don't grasp the significance the world is not like it was seventy years ago..."
The world is always changing. World leaders do grasp the significance of a changing world. That is why some countries continue to spar or flat out fight with others. Comparing now to WWII, technology has changed more than anything. Computers, the Internet, satellite television, communication and nukes.
What should be better, and has improved the most - communication - seems to have bogged down. Nations aren't talking. We don't communicate any better than 70 years ago, which is a gigantic failure. If we are on the eve of a major conflict, it should not come as a shock. No one is talking.
"...America boasting it is the best army is an unproven statement for one thing..."
I disagree. They are always involved in conflicts around the world and their troops are more seasoned and better trained than most. They test new wpns technology in actual combat and will use it when required.
'...Secondly when the bully of the block for three generations is finally in conflict with someone the other opponents decide to jump in and all hell breaks loose..."
What do you mean?
"... We saw what happened to Germany when it decided to take everyone on and Japan and the events of Indo China, It started when France went back to Vietnam at the end of WWII and it ended with a major conflict in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia and the United States lost the entire region the little guys chipped away at the fabric of America..."
Germany and Japan were about grabbing territory. The second part makes no sense to me. Little guys chipping away at the fabric of America?
"...North Korea for example, go in there, really the Chinese will defend them and we have a conflict that has simmered for decades in full war mode millions dead and South Korea is at risk..."
Trump's strategy seems to be to get China on board and get them to tell NK not to misbehave. I doubt the US is planning to invade NK. There's no reason to do so, and even if they were pals with China, the Chinese wouldn't like Americans on their back door. If you are a student of history, you will know that successive NK rulers have threatened war and always been given aid to shut them up. I believe that Trump is hoping fr more involvement from the Chinese. In short, having them tell NK to shut the hell up...or else. The 'or else' being a commitment from the Chinese to invade, should it become necessary.
"...What would we go into Syria? Syria is a religious diverse nation in which many Christians support the regime so what is our basis? The leader is a bad guy.. Well here is a news flash every damn government in the Middle East is run by a bad guy by degree including the one in Israel."
The ME is a rat's nest, but it's not about religion. It's not even about about Assad. It is having the Russians nosing around in the region. Assad's actions are an excuse IMO. I don't think anyone in the US cares if Assad gasses his own people. It's Russia and their attempts to find allies like Syria and Iran. Iran is one of the top oil producers in the region and friends with Syria.
The world continues to change. Right or wrong, world leaders are playing a game of chess and hoping that they can keep up with, and understand their opponents. Technology has definitely made it easier to destroy. For some reason, communication is just as pitiful as it was 70 years ago.
Communication is the key to understanding and resolution of conflict. The world is stuck in neutral there.
