It's Official... Russia Did Not Hack the Election

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
obama was good at NLP...hillary sucked
and NLP does describe much of the impetus for the left's ODDball behavior re losing
like having had their brains hacked, washed and conditioned
then lather rinse repeat...well, minus the repeat this time anyway
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Some large bunches of sour grapes there.

There's our cancon Hillary supporters right there!

 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Clinton excelled during the televised debates... I honestly believed that she would have won on that performance alone


That may well have worked for her if she hadn't, half way through every debate started mocking Donald. Her superciliousness was not her ally. The though of more years of Clintons was more than I could handle.

That's the predictably sad response that we've come to expect of you


You have to remember Cap't. - Cannuck is always right!
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
Russian Hacking: No New Proof yet the Narrative Continues

By Robert on January 8, 2017 2:00 PM | 2 Comments



Search for "Russian hacking" and you'll see a multitude of talking heads yammering on about the "terrible" Russians. Yet what precisely is the proof? According to this new article in Wired magazine, there's nothing:
In terms of proving the core claim that Russia hacked American political targets, though, Friday's report is sure to leave any skeptic not privy to classified briefings briefings unconvinced: It fails to include even the already public evidence visible to the cybersecurity community over the last six months, which drew a thick dotted line from the DNC hack to the Kremlin. A hacker calling himself Guccifer 2.0, for instance, in June claimed to be a lone Romanian hacker responsible for the breach. But the stolen DNC files he published on the web--and also said he'd leaked to WikiLeaks--contained telltale Russian-language error messages. A piece of malware known as X-Agent was used in both the DNC hack and previous attacks long believed to be Russian intelligence operations. And an analysis of the URL shortening service used by the hacker who stole the Gmail password of Clinton staffer John Podesta shows that the same account was used to target more than 5,000 other Gmail accounts, including Russia-focused journalists and authors, and the spouses of American military officials.
Related: John Batchelor and Stephen F. Cohen have an ongoing discussion about all things Russian. Here's a transcript of the latest segment.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Russian Hacking: No New Proof yet the Narrative Continues

By Robert on January 8, 2017 2:00 PM | 2 Comments



Search for "Russian hacking" and you'll see a multitude of talking heads yammering on about the "terrible" Russians. Yet what precisely is the proof? According to this new article in Wired magazine, there's nothing:
In terms of proving the core claim that Russia hacked American political targets, though, Friday's report is sure to leave any skeptic not privy to classified briefings briefings unconvinced: It fails to include even the already public evidence visible to the cybersecurity community over the last six months, which drew a thick dotted line from the DNC hack to the Kremlin. A hacker calling himself Guccifer 2.0, for instance, in June claimed to be a lone Romanian hacker responsible for the breach. But the stolen DNC files he published on the web--and also said he'd leaked to WikiLeaks--contained telltale Russian-language error messages. A piece of malware known as X-Agent was used in both the DNC hack and previous attacks long believed to be Russian intelligence operations. And an analysis of the URL shortening service used by the hacker who stole the Gmail password of Clinton staffer John Podesta shows that the same account was used to target more than 5,000 other Gmail accounts, including Russia-focused journalists and authors, and the spouses of American military officials.
Related: John Batchelor and Stephen F. Cohen have an ongoing discussion about all things Russian. Here's a transcript of the latest segment.

Ideologues and whiners never needed anything inconvenient like proof... Just ask any of them
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
Not always, just mostly but that's only because I'm smart
So smart you believe whatever the liberals spoon feed you. So smart you don't even understand even novice hackers can spoof IP addresses and use proxys so you never know where they are. Even I have software to spoof my IP beyond traceable recognition.
You mean Trumpites. You're embarrassed. I get it. Even your leader accepts the hacking occurred
I accept it took place. I just call bullsh!t about it being Russian intelligence. It's not hard to point a trail to any server or network you want when you know how and it's not hard to hide your identity and location either. There is no logic in the claim the Russian government did it but couldn't cover their tracks. If hackers were so easy to find they would all be in jail.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
The US intelligence services aren't "liberals". You're so silly

Liberal means "bad guy". Most of the Hill Folk that we see on here, probably have no idea of what "liberal" actually means. The Canadian "Liberal" party name really confuses the hell out of them, especially the Yanks, as there is little connection between those two "liberal" terms in the 21st century.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
Liberal means "bad guy". Most of the Hill Folk that we see on here, probably have no idea of what "liberal" actually means. The Canadian "Liberal" party name really confuses the hell out of them, especially the Yanks, as there is little connection between those two "liberal" terms in the 21st century.
Liberals are anybody that disagrees with them. I'm more fiscally conservative than all the Trumpites here put together. Trump is a classic New York City liberal that did a great sales job on the Trumpites. That's why they can't actually discuss his platform.
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
Liberals are anybody that disagrees with them. I'm more fiscally conservative than all the Trumpites here put together. Trump is a classic New York City liberal that did a great sales job on the Trumpites. That's why they can't actually discuss his platform.

You're a closet liberal socialist. You supported Hillary and support Wynne and secretly voted for Trudeau and Notley.
 
Last edited:

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Doesn't really matter who wrote the speeches, does it?

That said, it would be a foolish decision not to take advantage of that tech
Of course it does. Who do you think wrote the speeches for PM Martin and PM Harper about the direction the country would go would be the one recommended by big biz rather than what was best for the citizens (consumers).
Being paid would seem to put in a dividing line when the loyalty is to big biz instead. IMO
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
You're a closet liberal socialist. You supported Hillary and support Wynne and secretly voted for Trudeau and Notley.

I'm not the one supporting deficits, government handouts and increased taxes. Thanks for proving my point. You and Flossy have more in common than you're willing to admit.
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
I'm not the one supporting deficits, government handouts and increased taxes. Thanks for proving my point. You and Flossy have more in common than you're willing to admit.

I have for years been asking for a constitutional amendment forbidding deficit budgets and requiring essential services be fully funded. That would tend to preclude any handouts or pork-barrel spending and make the bureaucracy shrink to minimal levels.

I also support a flat tax program without any loopholes and only minor deductions aimed at those with children.

I'm a fiscally conservative Libertarian, you are a closet communist.