Carbon pricing is revenue neutral
Bullshyte!
Revenue Neutral Law and Legal Definition. The term Revenue Neutral implies changes in the tax laws that result in no change in the amount of revenue coming into the government's coffers. In other words, a tax proposal is revenue neutral if it neither increases nor decreases tax revenues when compared to existing law.
It froze in 72 and 73 as well.I have lived through worse. Lets go back a few years in 1949-50 as a kid I remember the tree fruit
industry lost most of its trees due to colder temperatures in 1956 Okanagan Lake froze over had to
cut ice for crossing the lake. In 1964 in December lakes froze again and in those years they had ice
racing with cars on a few lakes as well In 1968 one of the coldest winters in decades.
How do we explain those events in todays context. We have forgotten how cold it used to be
Climate change has always been with us and it changes all the time. Record keeping is a couple of
hundred years old on a planet that has been here for billions of years.
Should we be mindful of the environment around us Yes should we panic like chicken little no
It's not.
They already do it in BC and it's revenue neutral there too.
Hopefully you do know what revenue neutral means , and not just repeating the mantra.
If I put down electric bike on my tax form do they send me a credit and if I have 2 or more cars I pay a penalty??So THAT means that the government is going to lower other taxes (income tax? GST?) as soon as the carbon tariff kicks in?
Riiiiight.
Winter is climate change. LOL
And love the logic on how global warming causes cold weather. Idiot logic.
Carbon pricing is revenue neutral
Adding cold to Vancouver makes it 10% more.A carbon tax in Canada will magically fix all the carbon emission from China
And we produce less than 2% of the world'semissions
No they borrow money from you interest free for a year which you'll lose a big chunk of to inflation to give away as subsidies to oil and gas companies so they can produce more energy to export while reducing their energy inputs.So THAT means that the government is going to lower other taxes (income tax? GST?) as soon as the carbon tariff kicks in?
Riiiiight.
Adding cold to Vancouver makes it 10% more.
No they borrow money from you interest free for a year which you'll lose a big chunk of to inflation to give away as subsidies to oil and gas companies so they can produce more energy to export while reducing their energy inputs.
Our LNG exports are going to fuel former Asian coal power plants already designed for rapid conversion from coal.
It's true I saw it on TV and an official Gov of BC website.
BC Liberals are running ads to promote saving China from themselves using our NG and technology.
How much would the 40,000 miles of oceanic rifts have to spread to absorb the water that both icesheets could contribute to rising water. It isn't like the new shoreline will cause the extinction of more than a few empty towns.Why are we still arguing about GW? The glaciers don't give a damn whether we think the world is getting warmer or not; they simply continue to melt, and glaciers only melt if they get warmer. Forty years ago I went on a couple of glacier walks. I can't do that anymore because those glaciers are now gone. The current estimate of sea level increase due to melting glaciers is now 81mm. That doesn't sound like much but it is enough to allow high tide to invade the streets of several suburbs of Miami. Miami Beach Residents Say They’re Tired Of Continued High Tide Flooding « CBS Miami
Hopefully you do know what revenue neutral means , and not just repeating the mantra.
Yes, that's pretty much it.
The government doesn't profit from the revenue. It must be spent by the end of the year.