They funneled the money to a home school association. It's not the taxpayer's job to fund home schooling.
Home schoolers do get some government money in B.C.
Home schooling isn't wrong.
It's just remarkably inferior to public schooling and should not be supported with tax dollars.
that would be wrong. Aside from the fact that in many parts of the country it is the only option
If parents that home school or send their kids to private school can not access government money they should not have to pay school taxes.
Like I said, I would actually support public funding but we would need to properly analyse the curriculum first so it can be consistent and regulated.
You really got to gain some knowledge of subjects before you make yourself look stupid. Again. There is a set curriculum and exams and since I have helped a couple of kids that were home schooled with their work I can assure you it is not easy.One day in the office there was two tradesmen and the book keeper trying to figure out the math questions.
Why are you putting words in my mouth? Education can be provided from many sources. As long as whatever source can provide education meeting provincial standards they should qualify for public funding. Some public schools aren't delivering education to a high standard in my opinion. Case in point my granddaughter is taking a Cafeteria course in grade 11. Most days she's released from the class up to an hour early with no provision for instruction elsewhere to fill the gap. Kids now days are largely obese. Why couldn't extra P.E. be slotted in there?
I think the only criteria to receive public funding is the students be required to pass a Gov't exam upon completion of the course. (Oh I guess I'm forgetting....... teachers don't like exams anymore, they tend to embarrass the kids or give them low self esteem)
The exams are also a reflection on the ability or lack thereof of the teacher.
Are you suggesting 40% of Americans were home schooled?
I would believe 40% of AMericans received no education.