Many animals have territorial disputes. Or fight over food "resource.
Food and hunting grounds, yes. But they never fight for land for its own sake. That's unique to man.
Even among there own race.
Land is recourse. It's not unique to man. It's only a extension of our natural instincts. That originated from hunt and food.
Depends on the time of year. Right now the woods are multicultural, but in the spring and summer it's all green and intolerant of reds and yellows.
No, I think right about now there's a contest between brown and blaze orange.
So you're saying we can evolve then? So why can't we evolve into exogamy when a pitbull will happily do a German shepherd?
Racism or specism. It's all the same to me
****ing hell, can't people agree on anything in this madhouse?
Ewe...don't even want to think about that one.
Because we stop existing as a identity "family" when we do. Losing our tribal instinct will result with our extinction. It already has begun. We are well into our own self destruction.
Other tribes who continue to live as a family will continue, while our culture will disappear.
Honestly, I'd find it hilarious if I ever cought dogs practicing breedism. Just imagine you go to the park and you see the German shepperds in their corner and the golden labs in theirs, etc.
I'm confused now. First you pointed to nature as the standard. Now you're saying we shouldn't follow nature's example. So which is it?
Also, doesn't unity make a state stronger? Historically, city states abounded, but it soon became clear that to develop further, they had to evolve into the nation-state and eventually even federated states. Are you suggesting we return to little city states?
See why I find racism hypocrite?
If all races are equal then all life is equal. To not admit that is just being a hypocrite.
Strength in a tribe. Other tribes will continue and we will slowly disappear.
I guess that one got lost on you.
But is there not more strength in federated tribes than in a single tribe?Strength in a tribe. Other tribes will continue and we will slowly disappear.
So if golden labs and German sheppherds interbreed, they'll slowly disppear? And is that necessarily a bad thing? Consider for example how many Arabs today, outside of politics, consider themselves Arabs. Some consider themselves Iraqi first and Arab second, some Arab first and Iraqi second, the region's identity is in some flux. But there is at least some sense of a larger entity.
Consider Anglo identity too where we want to keep ties to the Commonwealth, or Franco identity where they want to keep ties with the Francophonie, etc. Are you suggesting that larger loyalties are bad and ought to be suppressed in favour of parochialism?
But is there not more strength in federated tribes than in a single tribe?