Is your stance that an elected official should follow his religious beliefs even to the point of ignoring the law?
What good is a religious belief if it imposes no obligation on the person in the public sphere.
Do you think that the many clergy, men and women, like Dietrich Boenhoeffer, Maximilian Kolbe, Edith Stein, who died in Nazi Concentration Camps, were obligated to follow the immoral laws of National Socialism over their own religious consciences. Abortion has claimed over 60 million lives in America since Roe v Wade in 1973, a holocaust many times the magnitude of that of the Nazis.
These are lives the were inscribed in the Book of Life by God, as Mike Pense state in the debate, invested with the full rights of personhood in the human community at the moment of conception. Tim Kaine simply submits to the right of the 'Law' to declare any life, even the most vulnerable, as eligible to arbitrary termination as an inconvenience to a parent or the state.
This is in contradiction to entire history of jurisprudence in Christian Civilization and beyond any recognition of an absolute, supernatural and transcendent 'Good' to which justice must be subservient.
You know where he's going to stand of Euthenasia. He has affirmed that homosexuality is natural, genetic, inevitable and legitimizes the devolution of marriage into an absurdity rather than a sacrament all in direct opposition of his own Scriptures and canon as a Catholic.
When i look at Kaine i recall the reference to Adolf Eichman, the arch administrator of the Final Solution, as to the banality of Evil, a bureacrat in the mechanism of a state infused with death and disorder.. obedient to a fault.
