Mother of the Year

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
5
36
London, Ontario
Woman who used her children to help shoplift gets two years behind bars for crimes across Alberta




A serial shoplifter who committed numerous thefts at businesses across Alberta, including ones where she involved her children, was sent to prison Friday.
Candace Dawn Minde, 32, was handed a two-year sentence after pleading guilty in provincial court to 62 charges, which mainly consisted of thefts under $5,000.
Judge Marilena Carminati noted the “sheer scope” of the more than $60,000 worth of thefts — suggesting it was on a “commercial scale” — and slammed Minde for using her children in the scheme.
“The use of children to commit some of these crimes is terrible and it is a seriously aggravating factor,” Carminati said.
Children deserve to have their innocence protected and should not be used to commit crimes.”
The judge also criticized Minde for “preying on the good will” of clerks who tried to help her and for lying to some of them by saying she was buying things to open a shelter.
Veteran Crown prosecutor Tania Sarkar told court she had never before seen such a “large-scale” case of shoplifting and described Minde as an “extremely prolific” thief who seemed to be committing crimes to acquire basic items such as gas, food and children’s clothing.
“This appears to be the way Miss Minde shops,” Sarkar said. “It is very disturbing.”
Court heard Minde stole from various stores — Walmart, London Drugs, Shoppers Drug Mart and Toys “R” Us — gas stations, convenience stores and liquor shops in Edmonton, Red Deer, Ponoka, St. Albert, Wetaskiwin, Sylvan Lake, Camrose and Airdrie throughout 2015.
On one occasion, at a Walmart in Drayton Valley, Minde made off with $7,351 worth of merchandise.
Most of the thefts occurred by her and various adults and children filling one or two shopping carts and bringing them up to the till and then, while the children or adult accomplices would start taking things to her vehicle, she would have problems with her debit or credit card.
She would then claim she needed to get cash or another card from either her vehicle or one of the adults, then simply not return. On some occasions, she would just flee while the store clerks tried to recover the goods.
Court heard she also used similar tactics after filling up with gas and grabbing lottery tickets and once did a dine and dash while the server was wrapping up food to go after she, a man and several children, had a $137 meal.
Many of the thefts involved electronic items such as laptops and cellphones she would pawn.
Court heard Minde was identified as being responsible for the thefts as a result of being captured on store surveillance cameras, but even after being put on probation or let out on bail, she continued stealing.
Defence lawyer Doug Vigen told court he asked Minde why and said she advised him of some tragic personal circumstances and a drug addiction which led to her going “off the rails.” He also said the mother of seven is pregnant and will give birth while in prison.


Woman who used her children to help shoplift gets two years behind bars for crimes across Alberta


Judge Marilena Carminati noted the “sheer scope” of the more than $60,000 worth of thefts — suggesting it was on a “commercial scale” — and slammed Minde for using her children in the scheme.
And yet she gets two years.......


Veteran Crown prosecutor Tania Sarkar told court she had never before seen such a “large-scale” case of shoplifting and described Minde as an “extremely prolific” thief who seemed to be committing crimes to acquire basic items such as gas, food and children’s clothing.
And yet she gets two years......


Court heard Minde was identified as being responsible for the thefts as a result of being captured on store surveillance cameras, but even after being put on probation or let out on bail, she continued stealing.
And yet she gets two years......


I don't know if five years or ten years would make any real kind of difference except that loss prevention might see some down time. But clearly there is a need for some kind unorthodox (just meaning outside the box, nothing abusive or cruel) methods for dealing with this kind of repeat offender. What that would be I don't really know but I'd bet real money a two year stint in jail isn't going to do anything to curb her behaviour.
 

Ludlow

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 7, 2014
13,588
0
36
wherever i sit down my ars
I suppose he is somehow to blame for the criminal behaviour.
Dad's need to be around to help guide the children. And don't give me that individual responsibility bullshyt excuse. I believe it was Judge Jeanine Pirro who conducted a study of Prison youth and found that 90 % of them had one thing in common. Absentee fathers. Usually kinds who get in trouble don't have a dad around and that's a fact. The mother has no excuse but the children are probably victims of abandonment and if they are not many are. So my first question in cases similar to this will always be,,where's the fukking dad? Regardless of what you think.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
I'd hire her, and her babies would be gods

she's the kind of nature that rules

women might be running the planet, I hope they do, being mothered is nice

I'd marry her.

I think I'm in love.
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
She was teaching them to be quick and have good reflexes.
No matter what happens there is a group of people that has
to bring up the mom and dad thing. There is a reality today
that has always been there many women leave the spouse
because when it come to some men they are asshol*s in
frog suits and some girls think they kissed a prince.
Then there is the women who take charge, the father may not
have been paying his child care either we don't know the whole
story. No not excusing the fact the mother is breaking the law
but desperate people and bad people do desperate and bad
things and that won't change come what may
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
She was teaching them to be quick and have good reflexes.
No matter what happens there is a group of people that has
to bring up the mom and dad thing. There is a reality today
that has always been there many women leave the spouse
because when it come to some men they are asshol*s in
frog suits and some girls think they kissed a prince.
Then there is the women who take charge, the father may not
have been paying his child care either we don't know the whole
story. No not excusing the fact the mother is breaking the law
but desperate people and bad people do desperate and bad
things and that won't change come what may


Oh ya, it's ALL about the man, cause everyone knows that all women are saints and only the men are useless dick heads.
 

Ludlow

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 7, 2014
13,588
0
36
wherever i sit down my ars
The question remains. These children were being exploited and corrupted. A caring father would have prevented his children from being involved in self destructive behavior regardless of the mothers guilt. Now, either they had a useless uncaring lazy piece of shyt dad who was home laying on the couch waiting for the "family' to bring home the goods, or he wasn't around. Unless I'm misinformed it takes a man and a woman to produce children so my question is still the same regardless of anything,,Where,,,,was the fukking dad?
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
The question remains. These children were being exploited and corrupted. A caring father would have prevented his children from being involved in self destructive behavior regardless of the mothers guilt. Now, either they had a useless uncaring lazy piece of shyt dad who was home laying on the couch waiting for the "family' to bring home the goods, or he wasn't around. Unless I'm misinformed it takes a man and a woman to produce children so my question is still the same regardless of anything,,Where,,,,was the fukking dad?



What does it matter? It was the FU CKING MOM that did all this. NOT the fu cking Dad.
 

Ludlow

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 7, 2014
13,588
0
36
wherever i sit down my ars
It matters bonehead because absentee fathers who bring children into this world and leave them to basically fend for themselves because Mom more than likely is overwhelmed are the "PRIMARY" reason for lawless children. Try listening for a moment instead of flapping your jaws in the wind like you always do wart. If the father were present in the childrens lives the incident more than likely would not have happened. Dumbazz.

And yes invisible dads are most assuredly useless dickheads. Regardless of how rotten the mother is. It's about the kids dummy.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
It matters bonehead because absentee fathers who bring children into this world and leave them to basically fend for themselves because Mom more than likely is overwhelmed are the "PRIMARY" reason for lawless children. Try listening for a moment instead of flapping your jaws in the wind like you always do wart. If the father were present in the childrens lives the incident more than likely would not have happened. Dumbazz.

And yes invisible dads are most assuredly useless dickheads. Regardless of how rotten the mother is. It's about the kids dummy.



So, then that lets the woman off the hook. It's the absentee Dad's fault. Gotcha..... sure you're not a millennial?
 

Ludlow

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 7, 2014
13,588
0
36
wherever i sit down my ars
Which one?
another good point

So, then that lets the woman off the hook. It's the absentee Dad's fault. Gotcha..... sure you're not a millennial?
Can't get it through your head can you. Dysfunctional families , especially lawless adolescents are primarily that way because of having no father around. It' a statistical fact. Get your mind off of the worthless mom for a second and consider the dickhead or dickheads that brought those children in to this world. Listen closely dimwit because clearly you have a hard time with simplicity. Lawless children are the result of not being guided by their parents primarily their fathers. Because in most cases, Mom is still there albeit in a diminished capacity because she has no help from her fukked up husband because why...",,,He's NOT THERE. Got it Joe Dirt? Kids need BOTH parents. And Daddy by in large is the one who usually drops the ball.

This mother got away with exploiting her children because Daddy wasn't there to protect them. Not too hard to understand I would suspect.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
This mother got away with exploiting her children because Daddy wasn't there to protect them. Not too hard to understand I would suspect.


No, she "got away" with it because SHE is a con artist and thief. Not "because" of anyone else. Ièm surprised you haven't blamed her parents.