So far the overwhelming majority, know you're complete dishonest and have zero cred.I can only hope that people will see this exchange and observe who is truly deflecting.
Last edited:
So far the overwhelming majority, know you're complete dishonest and have zero cred.I can only hope that people will see this exchange and observe who is truly deflecting.
I can only hope that people will see this exchange and observe who is truly deflecting.
That's gotta be some play for you to cross the border for.
I won't ask for details here for obvious reasons but PM me if you want.
May consider taking tha missus.
Both CDNBear and AnnaG can say what they want but have yet to actually address their prejudice and bigotry.
Which is fine, because people are becoming more compassionate as this kind of mentality is dying off.
Nah.
There's no grief.
I just know where they stand on this issue and they will be reminded in this context only.
If you want overreaction then just look to the multiple threads and commentary by an entire forum that's dedicated to me lol
Oddly enough, Fluffer has been a long time opponent of Christianity.... And there it is... Don't agree with Flossy and you're branded a bigot and prejudicial.
Oddly enough, Fluffer has been a long time opponent of Christianity.
Which makes his outrage all the more disingenuous, and of course hilarious.
With a molly chaser.Pathetic huh? It must be white privelege inducing his rage.
Why do some schools in the GTA force menstruating girls to sit at the back of the classroom ?And yet people HAVE killed others for their religion:
Abortion
Homosexuality
Race
Religion
Islam is not the only one who does it. So to vilify all Muslims is just as unfair to vilify all Christians.
I hope for no Sharia law, no Christian law, no Jewish law, no religious law what so ever.
Oddly enough, Fluffer has been a long time opponent of Christianity.
Which makes his outrage all the more disingenuous, and of course hilarious.
Why do some schools in the GTA force menstruating girls to sit at the back of the classroom ?
True but we could have that without the religious significances attached to it. We likely would be living under reasonable laws even if there were no such things as organized religions anyways.
What is Christian law anyway?True but we could have that without the religious significances attached to it. We likely would be living under reasonable laws even if there were no such things as organized religions anyways.
Everyone is prejudiced. But I do not address bigotry because I am not terribly bigoted. The closest thing I get to being a bigot is being intolerant towards people who choose to remain ignorant. Yes, folks like you bring out bigotry in me. And I have never apologized for that, I do not now apologize for that, and likely will never apologize for that, you turnip.Both CDNBear and AnnaG can say what they want but have yet to actually address their prejudice and bigotry.
Yet your "mentality" just keeps plodding along. So if you had compassion for others, you would keep your ignorant opinions to yourself and make attempts to DO something about your ignorance.Which is fine, because people are becoming more compassionate as this kind of mentality is dying off.
No, you do not. Why? Because you prefer shooting your yap off (figuratively) rather than asking people why they are thinking what they are thinking.I just know where they stand on this issue and they will be reminded in this context only.
Because turnips like you tend to sidetrack topics. The topic was about ON's premier and Boomer thought she is being silly because she is a lesbian. You began frothing at the mouth because CDN bear and I mentioned getting rid of organized religions. You poor turnip, you are confused as usual.Yes so instead of talking about me, which was so patently predictable, why don't you guys address the topic.
Exactly.Talk about patently predictable.
You were the one here, sonny jim, who peaked my freaking interest in just what the hell it was these two actually said that had you raving like you were. Post after post after post about them, not the topic, but them. Going on and on about how racist and prejudiced they were, that they needed to apologize....I seriously thought they must have expressly advocated beheading someone or something for fuks sakes. But no, that's not the case now was it?
And now that it gets shoved in your face, now you're all of a sudden all about the topic of the thread. Again an over used move on your part that I see you use whenever I see you back yourself into a corner.