I've always thought that blades and needles in Hallowe'en candy was a form of Munchhausen syndrome.
I am sure no one in Kamloops put needles in the candy except for the person who found them.
To all those who think that there is someone putting objects in Halloween handouts you need to pause and contemplate the scenario.
Of the less than a handful of reports from across North America they have involved only one person in each location.
If someone, in those locations, has decided that they hate kids enough to put foreign objects into those handouts why do they only put those objects in one?
Why wouldn't they put something in every thing they are handing out so that we would hear about 50 or more kids in a given neighbourhood finding something?
50 years ago as a kid I heard about 'razor blades' in apples.
Neither I, nor anyone I have known over the subsequent 50 years have found nor have I personally known of anyone finding anything in the thousands of handout that have happened over that time span.
No wonder the CONS thought the 'Muslims are under your bed' tactic would work...........
Where Did the Fear of Poisoned Halloween Candy Come From?
For nearly 30 years, University of Delaware sociologist Joel Best has been investigating allegations of strangers poisoning kids’ Halloween candy. As of this writing, he hasn’t identified a single confirmed example of a stranger murdering a child in this fashion.
He found other examples of people accidentally passing out tainted candy or, in one case, passing out ant poison as a gag gift to teenagers (no one was hurt), but the bogeyman of terrible people making trick-or-treating unsafe is a canard.
One example of a person trying, explicitly, to poison children via Halloween candy was confirmed. However, the child who died wasn’t a stranger—it was the man’s son.
On Halloween, 1974, an 8-year-old boy named Timothy O’Bryan died. His candy had, indeed, been poisoned. A few days prior, his father, Ronald Clark O’Bryan, took out a $40,000 life insurance policy on Timothy and Timothy’s sister, Elizabeth (then age 5), as an unimaginable way to get out of debt. The only way to collect required that at least one of his children die, so the elder O’Bryan laced some Pixy Stix with cyanide and cajoled his son into eating one before bed.
As murder would negate the insurance policy, the father had to cover his tracks. Already showing a wanton disregard for the lives of others—children, at that—he decided to potentially kill a few. He distributed some of the tainted candy to at least four other children (including his daughter), according to the
Houston Chronicle, setting up the story that a neighborhood madman or demented factory worker had caused the tragic death of his son. Fortunately, he was unsuccessful. None of the other children ended up eating the poison, in part due to a quick reaction from authorities and in part due to dumb luck—an 11-year-old tried to eat the sugar in the Pixy Stix he received, but could not undo the staples that O’Bryan had used to reseal the package.
As tragic as this story is, it is the only known example of a person intentionally poisoning Halloween candy and providing it to neighborhood trick-or-treaters. And Ronald Clark O’Bryan won’t be poisoning any more candy—the state of Texas executed him in 1984.
more
History, Travel, Arts, Science, People, Places | Smithsonian
After warning parents about a
metal item found in a trick-or-treater’s
Halloween candy, Auburn police are now saying that the story was fabricated
Auburn Police: Child Made Up Story About Metal In Candy Wrapper « CBS Boston