We won't save refugees by destroying our own country
- Thread starter B00Mer
- Start date
With all due respect, nonsense. We import 300,000+ immigrants every year now. It's not just a case of the jobs not being what Canadians are or aren't willing to do for work, it's also the fact that for at least a decade, central Canada was screaming for workers to fill jobs, decent paying jobs. But when roughly 95% of newcomers decide to settle in one of two cities, it doesn't help the situation in central Canada at all.
Except for the Filipinos. A lot of them settled in Winnipeg, one of the cities that was in desperate need of workers. I have to admire someone who moves from the tropics and settles in Canada's coldest city because THAT is where the jobs were.
When it comes to refugees, in any given year we already take in 10% of the world's refugees who have been processed and are ready for resettlement. Some years it's been as many as 1 in 6. We already do more than our share of heavy lifting when it comes to refugees.
I hear from several sources Germany is already in crisis from this recent influx of Muslims!
That's because Merkel shot off her mouth before thinking it all the way through, in typical left-tard fashion.
When you promise to take in 800,000 people when you only have public housing available for several hundred, that makes you a moron.
This is what happens when you allow emotion and ideology to take precedence over logic and reasoning.
Contrary to the majority, I guess. Tough on crime, tough on terrorists, resistance to refugees sounded good to me!
You don't need to tell me.
(Seems democracy is defined as allowing idiots to vote) 
It was, or has been greatly restricted. My point was that even while the TFW program was in full swing, we were still accepting 300,000+ immigrants every year. That number does not include illegals permitted to remain or refugees.
No problem. I re-read my previous post and realized I hadn't explained the connection I driving at very clearly.
Chambermaids is the only work they were given, Canadians at that level are all crack-heads.
Clearly you do that in more than the one post.
Interesting. I'll assume from your purposely vague answer, you're trying to suggest the Libs and the Dippers are an option. They aren't for me but then again, I'm a fiscal conservative.
I think nearly all of us here that do on occasion. And some simply wait to pounce on each other for it.
As the saying goes "most people listen (read) to respond, rather then listen (read) to understand.
but since no points are awarded for catching someone not being perfectly clear nor are their points for the person who purposely misunderstands it seems really a futile exercise.
Think of it as an improvement over making stick dolls and poking pins in them while chanting some dark sentences.