Death knell for AGW

Locutus

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
46
48
66
Steve Goddard ‏@SteveSGoddard

In 1961,there was unanimous consensus for global cooling @nytimes



http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf?res=F00B11FB385B147A93C2AA178AD85F458685F9 …






SCIENTISTS AGREE WORLD IS COLDER

After a week of discussions on the causes of climate change, an assembly of specialists from several continents seems to have reached unanimous agreement on only one point: it is getting colder.
 
waldo

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
Locutus said:
Snowy winter hard on climate change theory
Click to expand...

a most focused scientific analysis has been underway by many scientists for a couple of years now to attempt to understand just what is causing the jet-stream to dip so far south and to remain relatively 'static' for the long-periods of time being observed. Locutus, see Arctic/Polar Amplification and possible Arctic warming impacts on northern hemisphere extreme weather, both summer and winter - you're welcome!
 
petros

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,727
12,939
113
Low Earth Orbit
waldo said:
a most focused scientific analysis has been underway by many scientists for a couple of years now to attempt to understand just what is causing the jet-stream to dip so far south and to remain relatively 'static' for the long-periods of time being observed. Locutus, see Arctic/Polar Amplification and possible Arctic warming impacts on northern hemisphere extreme weather, both summer and winter - you're welcome!
Click to expand...

Welcome to the rapidly changing world of the toroid of energy that surrounds and protects us. Energy that can change ocean currents and jetstreams in our atmosphere.
 
waldo

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
Locutus said:
Steve Goddard ‏@SteveSGoddard

Another nail in the climate scamsters coffin. UAH now matches RSS satellite temperatures
Click to expand...

:mrgreen: Locutus!!!! C'mon Locutus, for years now the UAH hucksters (Uncle Roy in particular) were adamant that RSS was the outlier. And now this? Of course Locutus, you haven't a clue about satellite measurements... you know, all those adjustments that are made in attempting to estimate temperature. Imagine that... mega adjustments... many, many, many more than are made to surface temperature records. Hey Locutus, is this you saying you really like all those satellite adjustments... you're all for adjustments? :mrgreen:

of course, it was actually RSS that bailed out UAH and the big-time mega years fail that had UAH insisting temperatures had cooled. Why... that's how RSS was formed, right Locutus? Legitimate scientists came together and had to figure out what was wrong with the UAH methodology... cause Spencer/Christy couldn't manage it! Right Locutus?

but hey now, where's the UAH code? What's that... they now claim this is simply a beta release and they plan to publish for peer review/response... in a couple of years? A couple of years? And no one but UAH has seen their code? And deniers are trumpeting this "beta release" that hasn't undergone any scrutiny? Oh my, Locutus. Oh my!

wait now Locutus... those are NOAA and NASA satellites that UAH is using to derive the temperature from the lower-troposphere... 15 NOAA satellites in that mix! Oh my... don't tell member 'taxi'... he claims NOAA is a bunch of fraudsters! Well, he claims NASA is as well... but... that's just taxi!

but c'mon Locutus... get to the meat of it. Even in it's beta infancy, what does this change mean in terms of presuming upon actual surface temperature? C'mon Locutus... step up and show just where the satellite measurements fit in relation/comparison to surface temperature trends. You can do that, hey Locutus? Or are you simply limited to your continued C&P denier wizardry from your regular go-to denier source... anonymous denier blogger 'Steve Goddard'.
 
waldo

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
gerryh said:
In other words, you can't. Just curious, did you even graduate senior high school?
Click to expand...

you still smartin' ger? Are you finally ready... finally willing... to state your position and unequivocally show that you're not the denier I've stated you are? C'mon... you have my (now stated several times) commitment to provide you an apology... if you simply answer the questions I posed to you? Well... actually I narrowed that down to a single question in an attempt to get you to finally respond, right ger?

(note: the offering of an apology wasn't made to presume upon one being needed... again, the term denier doesn't hold any negative attachment... it isn't intended as a pejorative... it's simply a statement of fact in relation to positions held. Again, the apology was offered because you wigged out... over several threads... because you took exception to the label denier).

still waiting ger, still waiting
 
petros

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,727
12,939
113
Low Earth Orbit
waldo said:
says YOU, the soil-toiling, fake "earth scientist"! :mrgreen:
Click to expand...

I have a sheepskin that states otherwise. What do you have?

Was GIS part of your GED?

waldo said:
you still smartin' ger? Are you finally ready... finally willing... to state your position and unequivocally show that you're not the denier I've stated you are? C'mon... you have my (now stated several times) commitment to provide you an apology... if you simply answer the questions I posed to you? Well... actually I narrowed that down to a single question in an attempt to get you to finally respond, right ger?

(note: the offering of an apology wasn't made to presume upon one being needed... again, the term denier doesn't hold any negative attachment... it isn't intended as a pejorative... it's simply a statement of fact in relation to positions held. Again, the apology was offered because you wigged out... over several threads... because you took exception to the label denier).

still waiting ger, still waiting
Click to expand...

Why wait? He has stated his position several times.
 
waldo

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
petros said:
I have a sheepskin that states otherwise.
Click to expand...

do you keep it over you 'big swinging dick'?

petros said:
Why wait? He has stated his position several times.
Click to expand...

mind your own simpleton business

Locutus said:
Nah ya powerless little mark...what is easy is that I have the ability to make you post where I want.
Click to expand...
waldo said:
keep them comin' you powerless little stooge... what is easy is that I have the ABSOLUTE ABILITY to showcase your denialFails for all their denier-shytehouse worth!
Click to expand...
hey Locutus... do I also have the ability to "make you post where I want"? :mrgreen:
 
taxslave

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
waldo said:
:mrgreen: Locutus!!!! C'mon Locutus, for years now the UAH hucksters (Uncle Roy in particular) were adamant that RSS was the outlier. And now this? Of course Locutus, you haven't a clue about satellite measurements... you know, all those adjustments that are made in attempting to estimate temperature. Imagine that... mega adjustments... many, many, many more than are made to surface temperature records. Hey Locutus, is this you saying you really like all those satellite adjustments... you're all for adjustments? :mrgreen:

of course, it was actually RSS that bailed out UAH and the big-time mega years fail that had UAH insisting temperatures had cooled. Why... that's how RSS was formed, right Locutus? Legitimate scientists came together and had to figure out what was wrong with the UAH methodology... cause Spencer/Christy couldn't manage it! Right Locutus?

but hey now, where's the UAH code? What's that... they now claim this is simply a beta release and they plan to publish for peer review/response... in a couple of years? A couple of years? And no one but UAH has seen their code? And deniers are trumpeting this "beta release" that hasn't undergone any scrutiny? Oh my, Locutus. Oh my!

wait now Locutus... those are NOAA and NASA satellites that UAH is using to derive the temperature from the lower-troposphere... 15 NOAA satellites in that mix! Oh my... don't tell member 'taxi'... he claims NOAA is a bunch of fraudsters! Well, he claims NASA is as well... but... that's just taxi!

but c'mon Locutus... get to the meat of it. Even in it's beta infancy, what does this change mean in terms of presuming upon actual surface temperature? C'mon Locutus... step up and show just where the satellite measurements fit in relation/comparison to surface temperature trends. You can do that, hey Locutus? Or are you simply limited to your continued C&P denier wizardry from your regular go-to denier source... anonymous denier blogger 'Steve Goddard'.
Click to expand...

Yesterday you threatened to take your BS and leave us. I knew that would just be too good to be true. So you ready for yet another azzwhoopin with your fake data?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom