![]()
An awfully big target.
Right, now you just have to apologise for Guess Who, Celine Dion, Justin Beaver, Nickelback, Due South, Bob and Doug McKenzie, Peter Jennings, Michael J. Fox, Red Green, John Diefenbaker, Molson-brewed Foster's, and the Alberta Clipper, and I think you'll be caught up.
I do not, and don't call me Shirley.As the old saying goes:
'The bigger they come, the harder they hit'
Bob and Doug?.... Surely you jest
How would an aircraft carrier defend itself against a simultaneous onslaught of dozens of cruise missiles and an anti-ship ballistic missile?
Not apologizing for him neither. ha ha ha
No need to apologize. We are awesome. Folks from the U.S. come to a Canadian forum just to talk to us.
I remember seeing an aircraft carrier in Vancouver. That was before PET declared Canada a nuclear free zone.
I remember seeing an aircraft carrier in Vancouver. That was before PET declared Canada a nuclear free zone.
Any Brit ships in Battle Groups like Canadian ships?
Oh look! A baby one.
Yeah. The world is running scared of the might of the Royal Canadian Navy, what with its 15 surface combatants, four submarines and no aircraft carriers.
Don't be silly. Of course it's not. Canadians don't particularly care though. We don't define ourselves by such silly things. You, on the other hand, must be feeling a little neutered over this story, considering the importance you place on your navy.
Don't be silly. Of course it's not.
No, you don't. That's why if Canada is ever threatened by another country, you'll have to rely on the British and American to bail you out. I mean, why should the Canadians rely on something silly like a strong military when other countries will just come to their aid?Canadians don't particularly care though. We don't define ourselves by such silly things.
Why? Aren't you feeling neutered, considering that the entire Royal Canadian Navy could probably fit on that ship's flight deck?You, on the other hand, must be feeling a little neutered over this story
For centuries -- "Brittania ruled the waves." But today, the Royal Navy is irrelevant.
But today, the Royal Navy is irrelevant.
Canadians are smart enough to realize that with the sheer length of our coastline, our navy would have to be ridiculously large to have any real benefit when it comes to defence.
Canada is so weak militarily that its contribution to NATO is merely the paperwork side of things rather than the military side of things.It's far better to work within NATO and build the types of ships required by the organization
The Royal Navy could sink that carrier and turn it into an artificial reef in the Solent.
Good tactic. I guess even you realised you'd look a complete fool comparing the RN to the USN. Safer to pick on the Canadians.Canadians are smart enough to realize that with the sheer length of our coastline, our navy would have to be ridiculously large to have any real benefit when it comes to defence.[.quote]
The world's longest coastline and yet your navy consists of 14 surface combatans and for crappy, Col War-era submarines, and yet you have the audacity to poke fun at the Royal Navy.
Canada is so weak militarily that its contribution to NATO is merely the paperwork side of things rather than the military side of things.
Yeah. The world is running scared of the might of the Royal Canadian Navy, what with its 15 surface combatants, four submarines and no aircraft carriers.