Global Warming: still the ‘Greatest Scam in History’

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
If that is the rise over a year then why give us a chart that is based on 100 year cycles, give us the average rise or fall over the last 100 years or a chart that does it year by years. It probably doesn't matter how many apples you can get into an orange crate when looking at the grand scheme of things.
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
If that is the rise over a year then why give us a chart that is based on 100 year cycles, give us the average rise or fall over the last 100 years or a chart that does it year by years. It probably doesn't matter how many apples you can get into an orange crate when looking at the grand scheme of things.

an example of a 12th month moving average for global surface temperature over the last 100 years...




the full Daily Mail article that is mentioned in member Locutus' twitter reference... usually this tabloid rag get's it wrong; in this case, the article is somewhat accurate.
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36

I truly am heartened that you validate yourself through your interest in me! I will gladly engage your fixation and continue to remind you that you refused to answer the pointed question put to you... that you openly acknowledged that you have NO REASON... and that you stated you need NO REASON to have made your claim. I will relish each opportunity to highlight that you're simply one of the sycophantic lapdog followers blindly supporting another of your clubhouseBROs. Be well lapper, be well!
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
I truly am heartened that you validate yourself through your interest in me! I will gladly engage your fixation and continue to remind you that you refused to answer the pointed question put to you... that you openly acknowledged that you have NO REASON... and that you stated you need NO REASON to have made your claim. I will relish each opportunity to highlight that you're simply one of the sycophantic lapdog followers blindly supporting another of your clubhouseBROs. Be well lapper, be well!
It must hurt terribly for an alarmist such as yourself that wants to be taken seriously, that one little line of bullshte has ruined it forever for you....:lol:

 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
It must hurt terribly for an alarmist such as yourself that wants to be taken seriously, that one little line of bullshte has ruined it forever for you....:lol:

you mean in regard that "one little line" that you openly and categorically admitted you have NO REASON and that you require NO REASON to have made your claim of lying over... that "one little line"... that one?

I truly am heartened that you validate yourself through your interest in me! I will gladly engage your fixation and continue to remind you that you refused to answer the pointed question put to you... that you openly acknowledged that you have NO REASON... and that you stated you need NO REASON to have made your claim. I will relish each opportunity to highlight that you're simply one of the sycophantic lapdog followers blindly supporting another of your clubhouseBROs. Be well lapper, be well!
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36

bring it on oh feeble-minded one!

I truly am heartened that you validate yourself through your interest in me! I will gladly engage your fixation and continue to remind you that you refused to answer the pointed question put to you... that you openly acknowledged that you have NO REASON... and that you stated you need NO REASON to have made your claim. I will relish each opportunity to highlight that you're simply one of the sycophantic lapdog followers blindly supporting another of your clubhouseBROs. Be well lapper, be well!
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
You like the limelight Oh famous bullshter...there you go

be the good lil' lapdog you are! :mrgreen:

I truly am heartened that you validate yourself through your interest in me! I will gladly engage your fixation and continue to remind you that you refused to answer the pointed question put to you... that you openly acknowledged that you have NO REASON... and that you stated you need NO REASON to have made your claim. I will relish each opportunity to highlight that you're simply one of the sycophantic lapdog followers blindly supporting another of your clubhouseBROs. Be well lapper, be well!
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
You helping your cause?????????????????


are you? :mrgreen: I will gladly stop the nonsense... the onus is on you. Of course, this latest episode isn't at all new around here! There is no effective/active board moderation... the moderation that appears to exist is one that actively encourages this and eggs it on. It clearly doesn't matter to or your clubhouseDenyingBROs that this trashes and derails threads... and certainly doesn't foster any semblance of real engagement, real discussion. In fact, this is the type of tactic you deniers relish as it gives you the opportunity to bury real discussion that shows just how facking desperate your denial is!
 

Zipperfish

House Member
Apr 12, 2013
3,688
0
36
Vancouver
are you? :mrgreen: I will gladly stop the nonsense... the onus is on you. Of course, this latest episode isn't at all new around here! There is no effective/active board moderation... the moderation that appears to exist is one that actively encourages this and eggs it on. It clearly doesn't matter to or your clubhouseDenyingBROs that this trashes and derails threads... and certainly doesn't foster any semblance of real engagement, real discussion. In fact, this is the type of tactic you deniers relish as it gives you the opportunity to bury real discussion that shows just how facking desperate your denial is!

Quite whining about the moderators and moderate yourself.
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
Quite whining about the moderators and moderate yourself.

this is good... I don't mind being singled out... do you perhaps have a suggestion to give to anyone else in this same regard?

Yo admitting to bullshting.....that you were never in Machu picchu?
No??????

based on what? You've stated you have NO REASON to doubt that I was there. You've stated that you also require NO REASON to doubt that I was there. I provided a simple anecdote that I was there and made the apparent glaring reference to the buses (that exist) bringing tourists to the site. That is the entirety of everything that I said.., I said nothing else. From that simple anecdotal reference you've chosen your path... one you can't substantiate and one you openly admit to having no basis in making the charge you have. And you call me the bull****ter here?