Palestinian sovereignty W Bank Gaza E Jerusalem

[Colpy]

Bill of Rights became the Charter Copy.

The Charter was preceded by the Canadian Bill of Rights, which was enacted in 1960

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Bill of Rights was merely an act of Parliament. It was not a constitutional document. A shame, as the Bill of Rights is superior..........

 

[gore0bsessed]

Excuse me?

Your examples are telling.

The BNA Act of 1867 is the supreme law of Canada (Now the Constitution Act of 1982, which is simply the BNA Act with the Charter added)

the Constitution of the United States was adopted in 1789, and is the Supreme law of that country.

Charters matter.



If you knew anything about Islamic philosophy, you would know that making treaties with the infidel is completely acceptable when advantageous to the Muslim, but the ultimate purpose is never to be forgotten:

War is eternal

The fact that Islam legitimises deceit during war cannot be all that surprising; strategist Sun Tzu (c. 722-221 BC), Italian political philosopher Machiavelli (1469-1527) and English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) all justified deceit in war.
However, according to all four recognised schools of Sunni jurisprudence, war against the infidel goes on in perpetuity, until "all chaos ceases, and all religion belongs to Allah" (Quran 8:39). According to the definitive Encyclopaedia of Islam (Brill Online edition): "The duty of the jihad exists as long as the universal domination of Islam has not been attained. Peace with non-Muslim nations is, therefore, a provisional state of affairs only; the chance of circumstances alone can justify it temporarily. Furthermore there can be no question of genuine peace treaties with these nations; only truces, whose duration ought not, in principle, to exceed ten years, are authorised. But even such truces are precarious, inasmuch as they can, before they expire, be repudiated unilaterally should it appear more profitable for Islam to resume the conflict."
The concept of obligatory jihad is best expressed by Islam's dichotomised worldview that pits Dar al Islam (House of Islam) against Dar al Harb (House of War or non-Muslims) until the former subsumes the latter. Muslim historian and philosopher, Ibn Khaldun (1332- 1406), articulated this division by saying: "In the Muslim community, holy war [jihad] is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and the obligation to convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force. The other religious groups did not have a universal mission, and the holy war was not a religious duty for them, save only for purposes of defence. But Islam is under obligation to gain power over other nations."
This concept is highlighted by the fact that, based on the ten-year treaty of Hudaibiya , ratified between Muhammad and his Quraish opponents in Mecca (628), ten years is theoretically the maximum amount of time Muslims can be at peace with infidels (as indicated earlier by the Encyclopaedia of Islam). Based on Muhammad's example of breaking the treaty after two years, by citing a Quraish infraction, the sole function of the "peace-treaty" (hudna) is to buy weakened Muslims time to regroup for a renewed offensive. Muhammad is quoted in the Hadith saying: "If I take an oath and later find something else better, I do what is better and break my oath (see Sahih Bukhari V7B67N427)."


Islam's doctrines of deception :: Middle East Forum

Bad source, which only purpose is to criticize Islam regardless if it has to resort to complete propaganda and ignore facts completely.

 

[Colpy]

Bad source, which only purpose is to criticize Islam regardless if it has to resort to complete propaganda and ignore facts completely.

Well, as to being able to ignore the facts, you're an expert.

The source stands, until you find one to counter it.

 

[gore0bsessed]

The source collapses under reality, wake up.

 

[petros]

The Bill of Rights was merely an act of Parliament. It was not a constitutional document. A shame, as the Bill of Rights is superior..........

It still applies for the most part. The Charter has immense importantance and pride to me as it's a family thing.

Bad source, which only purpose is to criticize Islam regardless if it has to resort to complete propaganda and ignore facts completely.

What makes it a bad source? The translation was agreed upon as the best Arab to English translation going.

 

[Colpy]

The source collapses under reality, wake up.

You wouldn't know reality if it bit you on the ar$e.

The source references the reality quite well, thank you.

 

[gore0bsessed]

You wouldn't know reality if it bit you on the ar$e.

The source references the reality quite well, thank you.

Maybe in your delusional head, reality tell us something different.

 

[darkbeaver]

Everyone who really loves Israel should go there and help build the First Temple.

 

[petros]

Everyone who really loves Israel should go there and help build the First Temple.

Animal sacrifices and all?

 

[taxslave]

You are ill informed.

You are far too polite.

 

[Colpy]

Maybe in your delusional head, reality tell us something different.

After taking into consideration your lack of references or any source material, I have decided to take this discussion to a level you can deal with:

DOES NOT!

 

[BaalsTears]

Palestinians are a bunch of losers who adopted the identity of their conquerors.

 

[gore0bsessed]

After taking into consideration your lack of references or any source material, I have decided to take this discussion to a level you can deal with:

DOES NOT!

You haven't posted anything but nonsense and pro-israeli sources. I speak only facts.

 

[gerryh]

You haven't posted anything but nonsense and pro-israeli sources. I speak only facts.

No, you regurgitate terrorist propaganda and u.n. pap.




Like the bullshyte comment concerning cease fires. Hamas/Palestinians have broken every single one.

 

[Colpy]

you haven't posted anything but nonsense and pro-israeli sources. I speak only facts.

do not!
​

 

[gore0bsessed]

No, you regurgitate terrorist propaganda and u.n. pap.




Like the bullshyte comment concerning cease fires. Hamas/Palestinians have broken every single one.

No they haven't, you ignorant douchebag.

 

[gerryh]

No they haven't, you ignorant douchebag.

Yup yup yup. unless you have crawled up the terrorists a$$ and have swallowed their propaganda, then you believe that Hamas is all about sugar and roses and Israel is the big bad.

 

[Ludlow]

I know ur but wut am I

 

[Colpy]

no they haven't, you ignorant douchebag.

did so!
​

 

[damngrumpy]

Without the vote of the United States the resolution is a hollow piece of paper
I am guessing this is nothing more than a hollow stunt by the UN to demonstrate
it has relevance which in recent years it lacks.