Geez, JLM, even I wouldn't make THAT comparison.
More like it.
Thought it might just help to get people to refrain from giving him too much support.
Quit picking on the Shiny Pony
- Thread starter DaSleeper
- Start date
Thought it might just help to get people to refrain from giving him too much support.
The Conservative Party supporters are beside themselves since the election of Trudeau as party leader. One would think, given his obvious failings, one could quite easily crush him by expounding on the Conservative party's successes....oh yeah...wait...never mind.
Oh Boy.....yet another reason to keep Trudeau away from the PM's office:
National News: Liberals oppose Conservative gun bill
Contributed by admin on Nov 27, 2014 - 08:18 AM
OTTAWA – The Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada, Justin Trudeau, today issued the following statement on Bill C-42:
“The Liberal Party of Canada feels strongly that Bill C-42, currently before Parliament, contains aspects that will put Canadians’ safety at risk.
“First, it eliminates the need for owners of prohibited and restricted firearms to have a transportation license to carry those guns in their vehicles. This means they could freely transport handguns or automatic weapons anywhere within their province, whether to a grocery store or a soccer field.
“Secondly, it would take the power to classify firearms out of the hands of the police – the experts in keeping Canadians safe – and put it in the hands of politicians like Stephen Harper. And it would allow those decisions to be made without Parliamentary approval or oversight.
“We think Canadians will agree that this is wrong.
“That said, we support several elements in this legislation. We agree that there should be a streamlining of licencing paperwork, that safety training requirements should be tightened, and that we must make it harder for those convicted of domestic offences to obtain a firearm.
“Instead of ramming this bill through as-is, we are encouraging the government to split C-42 in order to help expedite the acceptable measures through Parliament.
“We will not bring back a gun registry, but we do need smart and well-crafted gun control legislation. In its current form, C-42 is neither; instead, it makes Canadians less safe.
“That is why the Liberal Party of Canada cannot and will not support this bill.”
Liberals oppose Conservative gun bill NorthumberlandView.ca
So, let's look at it step by step.
First:
“First, it eliminates the need for owners of prohibited and restricted firearms to have a transportation license to carry those guns in their vehicles. This means they could freely transport handguns or automatic weapons anywhere within their province, whether to a grocery store or a soccer field.
BS. Your firearms license indicates what class of firearms you are allowed to own. You are only allowed to transport those restricted firearms double-locked (with a trigger lock and in a locked container separate from ammunition) between the shooting range and your home by a direct route. The only difference is paperwork. The new law removes the requirement to apply for the (automatically issued) Authorization to Transport to the range, and makes your restricted firearms license that authorization. No supermarkets, no soccer games.
Secondly:
“Secondly, it would take the power to classify firearms out of the hands of the police – the experts in keeping Canadians safe – and put it in the hands of politicians like Stephen Harper. And it would allow those decisions to be made without Parliamentary approval or oversight.
A state in which the police make the laws is called a police state (something the Trudeaus seem to have a genetic tendency to love) That is why we have an elected body to make laws. The RCMP have repeatedly approved firearms, only to unapprove them after thousands have sold, forcing their owners to turn them in without compensation. The RCMP have shown themselves to be absolutely incompetent in this area............to say nothing of the inappropriate nature of the police making law.
an aside:
“We think Canadians will agree that this is wrong.
Justin: Fvck off. When I need a brain-dead, elitist pretty-boy with despotic tendencies to tell me what I do or do not think as a Canadian I will give you a call. Don't hold your breath....oh wait. I take that back. Please do hold your breath.
National News: Liberals oppose Conservative gun bill
Contributed by admin on Nov 27, 2014 - 08:18 AM
OTTAWA – The Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada, Justin Trudeau, today issued the following statement on Bill C-42:
“The Liberal Party of Canada feels strongly that Bill C-42, currently before Parliament, contains aspects that will put Canadians’ safety at risk.
“First, it eliminates the need for owners of prohibited and restricted firearms to have a transportation license to carry those guns in their vehicles. This means they could freely transport handguns or automatic weapons anywhere within their province, whether to a grocery store or a soccer field.
“Secondly, it would take the power to classify firearms out of the hands of the police – the experts in keeping Canadians safe – and put it in the hands of politicians like Stephen Harper. And it would allow those decisions to be made without Parliamentary approval or oversight.
“We think Canadians will agree that this is wrong.
“That said, we support several elements in this legislation. We agree that there should be a streamlining of licencing paperwork, that safety training requirements should be tightened, and that we must make it harder for those convicted of domestic offences to obtain a firearm.
“Instead of ramming this bill through as-is, we are encouraging the government to split C-42 in order to help expedite the acceptable measures through Parliament.
“We will not bring back a gun registry, but we do need smart and well-crafted gun control legislation. In its current form, C-42 is neither; instead, it makes Canadians less safe.
“That is why the Liberal Party of Canada cannot and will not support this bill.”
Liberals oppose Conservative gun bill NorthumberlandView.ca
So, let's look at it step by step.
First:
“First, it eliminates the need for owners of prohibited and restricted firearms to have a transportation license to carry those guns in their vehicles. This means they could freely transport handguns or automatic weapons anywhere within their province, whether to a grocery store or a soccer field.
BS. Your firearms license indicates what class of firearms you are allowed to own. You are only allowed to transport those restricted firearms double-locked (with a trigger lock and in a locked container separate from ammunition) between the shooting range and your home by a direct route. The only difference is paperwork. The new law removes the requirement to apply for the (automatically issued) Authorization to Transport to the range, and makes your restricted firearms license that authorization. No supermarkets, no soccer games.
Secondly:
“Secondly, it would take the power to classify firearms out of the hands of the police – the experts in keeping Canadians safe – and put it in the hands of politicians like Stephen Harper. And it would allow those decisions to be made without Parliamentary approval or oversight.
A state in which the police make the laws is called a police state (something the Trudeaus seem to have a genetic tendency to love) That is why we have an elected body to make laws. The RCMP have repeatedly approved firearms, only to unapprove them after thousands have sold, forcing their owners to turn them in without compensation. The RCMP have shown themselves to be absolutely incompetent in this area............to say nothing of the inappropriate nature of the police making law.
an aside:
“We think Canadians will agree that this is wrong.
Justin: Fvck off. When I need a brain-dead, elitist pretty-boy with despotic tendencies to tell me what I do or do not think as a Canadian I will give you a call. Don't hold your breath....oh wait. I take that back. Please do hold your breath.
shiny ponies in the street
David AkinVerified account @davidakin
Remember how the 2006 “soldiers in streets” ad turned out for #LPC. Isn’t this the 2014 version?
David AkinVerified account @davidakin Remember how the 2006 “soldiers in streets” ad turned out for #LPC. Isn’t this the 2014 version?
??? the "ad" that only appeared for a few hours on the Liberal web-site before being pulled... that one? The "ad" that only received any real notice because of the antics of Harper Conservatives pushing their fake concern over it... that one?
Was born in Canada.. YOU FAIL!!!
so what? You're still doing it... is an American liberal Democrat the same thing as a Canadian liberal Liberal?
no dummy, the 'ad' that replayed endlessly in the media for several days , generating thousands of spam dollars in free campaign publicity, that 'ad'.
the 'ad' that martin said he approved. the 'ad' that never needed to broadcast on network tv as an 'ad' because it was relentlessly re-run. that 'ad'.
the 'ad' that was then parodied and mocked to death by air farce, 22 minutes and the daily show because it was so retarded and untrue. that ad.
the 'ad' that because of how offensive and stupid it was and because how the liberals did in fact 'make this up' that had the viral aspect going for it had to be disavowed and pulled. that 'ad'.
dummy? Pardon?..... you mean the "ad" that was never broadcast, that one? You mean the "ad" that Martin said he approved the transcript for... the "ad" that Martin disapproved after seeing the final product... the "ad" that was only on the website for a matter of hours, that one? You mean the "ad" that Harper Conservatives issued their fake protest/concern over and aided and abetted the trumped up parady/mocking and "re-running" that you appear to so revel in, that one?
It's ironic that liberals, at least in this forum, when it comes to protesters, police shootings etc., usually side against the police...Yet they want the police to decide what (if any) firearms citizens will be allowed to own...
This is why the Liberal way of thinking never made much sense to me, after I grew up.
This is why the Liberal way of thinking never made much sense to me, after I grew up.
Don't be silly. Liberals want the government to decide that. It's the police's job to enforce the law. Maybe you shouldn't just make **** up to suit your agenda. It really hurts what little credibility you have here.
it's ironic that the gun-luvin types... so worried about the government "comin fer their guns"... appear to be so trusting of the government to make the decisions determining restriction levels - go figure!
Where have you been hibernating the last few years...
BTW keep dancing by yourself.....
I only trust the government when the law makes sense...
Not the cops...and I don't know a single person right or left that believe it's the police's job. Why do you say such stupid things?
