Death knell for AGW
- Thread starter Walter
- Start date
I didn't think your questioning was genuine; in any case, it's a very high-level graphic that speaks to the radiative forcings for the main drivers behind climate change (relative to 1750). If you haven't the wherewithal to speak to the graphic detail/annotation, perhaps spend some time doing a bit of reading/research.
another voice of reason and intelligence heard from!
Ahhh yes, go research yourself, lol.
That sounds a lot like code for "Ummm, I don't know, I'm just a pretty coloured parrot", lol.
He actually makes more sense and comes from a place of reason, than you. But than again, he's actually being honest.
Something you should try.
as I predicted your avoidance in answering questions/requests... this being the latest:
I didn't even read your dishonest post.
But since you highlighted it, you do realise there's no question mark in there, right?
Maybe you should write smart, before you try and pretend you are.
for someone unfamiliar with the topic, there's a lot behind the graphic detail. I doubted the member's genuine questioning and stated as much. I did not realize all you guys needed to be hand-held. Sorry, it's one thing to put up with your nonsense; it's an entirely different thing to attempt to bring understanding forward for the most closed-minded.
Ahhh yes, yet another fallacy.
Are you aware of all your failings, or do you truly not understand what you type?
there's no dishonesty no matter how many times you state so. I said "questions/requests"... I'll quote it again for you, if you'd like. In that regard, you received a request. How sad you've now resorted to hiding behind textual interpretation. They are simple requests made of you... yet you're avoiding them to no end; again: " Why not settle out your own very overt emotional stance and simply state what your position is on AGW, global warming, climate change."
more of your avoidance, hey?
You're quite the arrogant piece of work aren't you? Dismissive right off the bat with a forum member who, as I've always known him, to be incredibly fair and even handed with everyone. But you cannot be bothered to get your nose out of your own backside long enough to actually discuss the topic with someone who asked a legitimate question. Why, isn't that the very thing you've been spouting off and complaining about?
Oh, and just so you're aware, this isn't a drive by. You now have my full attention. You'll be begging for the Cannibal Troll before long.
Your post is littered with dishonesty, and a lack of proper punctuation.
Again, I'm not answering you until you apologize for lying.
Seriously, how is it you don't know what irony is, but do it oh so well?
Ummm, I already told you, it's your claim to defend. I'm not going on the defensive just because you feel stupid.
"How sad you've now resorted to hiding behind textual interpretation. " You do not even understand how foolish you appear when trying to impress with language. The fact is, simple descriptive everyday language is quite sufficient. If you intend to argue with Bear you will need brains to go with the large empty balls.
It's a simple request for you to assert your denial... or to project your acceptance.
I accept your unwillingness to answer the request: this request: "Why not settle out your own very overt emotional stance and simply state what your position is on AGW, global warming, climate change."
Interesting choice of words, and again, as dishonest as you've proven to be so far.
Bull sh*it. You all but told him he wasn't worth your time because he's not as stuck up as you are. If you had any interest whatsoever in actually moving forward on a cause that you truly cared about, you'd take the time with anyone who posed a question. But you don't, my guess would be because you're nothing but a poser and a troll who likes to post pictures and graphs on the internet to make believe they're all important. You're not the first one here, you won't be the last.
But tell me, honestly, is it Mom's basement or Mom's basement again.
there's this red-coloured text at the bottom of each page... something about, "Off-limits: Personal attacks". What does that mean to you and the rest of "the gang" around here?
I just noticed this board has a post ratings option and you guys are certainly going to town
I took the time and made the effort to provide the graphic/explanation. It was I that received a rather curt dismissive response in return. I could care less what you interpret.