Denmark’s Obsequious Treatment of Returning ISIS Fighters

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Pretend Navies can't fight actual battles.

All of the fancy computer generated pictures of what your navy might look like if it actually existed means nothing.

... But if it makes you feel better, I can agree that Britain has the best collection of pictures of a navy
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,948
1,910
113
Pretend Navies can't fight actual battles.

The RN certainly did at Sluys in 1340; Quiberon Bay in 1759; Trafalgar in 1805; against the Armada in 1588; Barfleur in 1692; Jutland in 1916; Taranto in 1940; on the Nile in 1798; against the Bismarck in 1941; and during The Glorious First of June in 1794.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
The RN certainly did at Sluys in 1340; Quiberon Bay in 1759; Trafalgar in 1805; against the Armada in 1588; Barfleur in 1692; Jutland in 1916; Taranto in 1940; on the Nile in 1798; against the Bismarck in 1941; and during The Glorious First of June in 1794.

Nothing since sailing ship daze then.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
jeez man, did ya have a little dane in ya at one point? kinda touchy about them bastards aren't ya?

The brits have A LOT of Dane in them!

They weren't exactly sleeping. They were busy sucking up to, and making cushy business deals, with the Nazis, like the anti-Semitic Ford and his car company. Maybe that's why they didn't notice thousands of heavily armed Japanese sneaking up on them at Pearl Harbour.

WWII would also have been won by the Allies even had American not entered the conflict.

Saved your azzes AND whooped the Japanese without Brit help.

The British staved off an invasion by Nazi Germany when they won the Battle of Britain when Britain was alone against Nazi Germany.

Brit allies including the US won the Battle of Britain.

The Battle of Britain was a mere skirmish made popular by the brits alone. There was a Battle of Britain just about every day in the South Pacific.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,948
1,910
113
Nothing since sailing ship daze then.


The Battle of Jutland in June 1916 between Britain and Germany was on that list of some of the Royal navy's greatest victories. It was the largest naval battle and the only full-scale clash of battleships in WWI. It was only the third-ever fleet action between steel battleships, following the smaller but more decisive battles of the Yellow Sea (1904) and Tsushima (1905) during the Russo-Japanese War.

And don't forget the great naval battles of WWII that it took part in (one or two of which the man who is now Prince Philip showed great heroism in), and the heroic sinking of the Belgrano during the Falklands War.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
The Battle of Jutland in June 1916 between Britain and Germany was on that list of some of the Royal navy's greatest victories. It was the largest naval battle and the only full-scale clash of battleships in WWI. It was only the third-ever fleet action between steel battleships, following the smaller but more decisive battles of the Yellow Sea (1904) and Tsushima (1905) during the Russo-Japanese War.

The Germans clearly won the Battle of Jutland.

And don't forget the great naval battles of WWII that it took part in (one or two of which the man who is now Prince Philip showed great heroism in), and the heroic sinking of the Belgrano during the Falklands War
A modern sub sinking a WWII era Light Cruiser in 1982 is what amounts to a "heroic" Briddish victory. LMAO
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,948
1,910
113
The brits have A LOT of Dane in them!

People in the North of England do, the area that used to be the Danelaw. In the South of England they're more of Anglo-Saxon descent; the Welsh are the descendants of Celts who came to these shores from the Iberian peninsular (that's why the Welsh are slightly darker skinned); the Scots are of Pictish, Gaelic and Nordic descent.


Saved your azzes AND whooped the Japanese without Brit help.

You were Britain's little junior partner until 1944. Now don't argue with me. I'm not going to change my tune.


Brit allies including the US won the Battle of Britain.

The US didn't take part in the Battle of Britain. You weren't even in the war in 1940.


The Battle of Britain was a mere skirmish made popular by the brits alone.

It wasn't a mere skirmish to the British, who would have faced a Nazi invasion had they lost the battle.


There was a Battle of Britain just about every day in the South Pacific.

Yeah, sure there was. Did someone tell you that or did you make it up? The Battle of Britain remains the second-largest aerial battle in history after the one that took place during the 1943 Battle of Kursk between the USSR and Germany.

The Germans clearly won the Battle of Jutland.

The Germans didn't clearly win it. If they had done then it wouldn't have been the inconclusive result that it was. However, British dominance of the North Sea was maintained after the battle. At the end of the year, after further unsuccessful attempts to reduce the Royal Navy's numerical advantage, the German Navy turned its efforts and resources to unrestricted submarine warfare and the destruction of Allied and neutral shipping which by April 1917 triggered the United States of America's declaration of war on Germany


A modern sub sinking a WWII era Light Cruiser in 1982 is what amounts to a "heroic" Briddish victory. LMAO

And what's so funny? The Belgrano was an armed warship which posed a threat to British forces and she was "dealt with accordingly" after ignoring the warnings.

Through a message passed via the Swiss Embassy in Buenos Aires to the Argentine government on 23rd April 1982, Britain made clear that it no longer considered the 200-mile exclusion zone as the limit of its military action. The message read:

In announcing the establishment of a Maritime Exclusion Zone around the Falkland Islands, Her Majesty's Government made it clear that this measure was without prejudice to the right of the United Kingdom to take whatever additional measures may be needed in the exercise of its right of self-defence under Article 51 of the United Nations Charter. In this connection Her Majesty's Government now wishes to make clear that any approach on the part of Argentine warships, including submarines, naval auxiliaries or military aircraft, which could amount to a threat to interfere with the mission of British Forces in the South Atlantic will encounter the appropriate response. All Argentine aircraft, including civil aircraft engaged in surveillance of these British forces, will be regarded as hostile and are liable to be dealt with accordingly.

The Belgrano ignored the warnings and was, subsequently, blown out of the water by Royal Navy nuclear-powered submarine HMS Conqueror on 2nd May 1982 for the loss of 323 lives.

She is the only ship ever to have been sunk during military operations by a nuclear-powered submarine and the second sunk in action by any type of submarine since World War II, the first being the Indian frigate INS Khukri by the Pakistani Hangor during the 1971 Indo-Pakistani War.

By the way, the Belgrano used to be an American warship - USS Phoenix - which saw action in WWII. Unlike the Phoenix, though, it didn't rise, it sank.

 
Last edited:

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
People in the North of England do, the area that used to be the Danelaw. In the South of England they're more of Anglo-Saxon descent; the Welsh are the descendants of Celts who came to these shores from the Iberian peninsular (that's why the Welsh are slightly darker skinned); the Scots are of Pictish, Gaelic and Nordic descent.

The Danes were ALL OVER England. Having their way as they pleased.




You were Britain's little junior partner until 1944. Now don't argue with me. I'm not going to change my tune.

The US, Canada, and the Anzacs carried the weight of the Anglo- Allied Alliance. The brits were subordinates.




The US didn't take part in the Battle of Britain. You weren't even in the war in 1940.

US Eagle Squadrons were the vanguard of the RAF




It wasn't a mere skirmish to the British, who would have faced a Nazi invasion had they lost the battle.

A few dogfights won by the allied air forces was all it was. The brits never would have been able to stave off an invasion by the Nazis. It was Operation Barbarossa that kept the Germans from whipping your butts entirely.



Yeah, sure there was. Did someone tell you that or did you make it up? The Battle of Britain remains the second-largest aerial battle in history after the one that took place during the 1943 Battle of Kursk between the USSR and Germany.

Comparing the Battle of Britain dogfights over a period of months to the Battle of Kursk! LMAO



The Germans didn't clearly win it. If they had done then it wouldn't have been the inconclusive result that it was.

Changing your tune eh! :)

The Germans thumped the Brit navy at Jutland.



The Belgrano ignored the warnings and was, subsequently, blown out of the water by Royal Navy nuclear-powered submarine HMS Conqueror on 2nd May 1982 for the loss of 323 lives.

She is the only ship ever to have been sunk during military operations by a nuclear-powered submarine and the second sunk in action by any type of submarine since World War II, the first being the Indian frigate INS Khukri by the Pakistani Hangor during the 1971 Indo-Pakistani War.

By the way, the Belgrano used to be an American warship - USS Phoenix - which saw action in WWII. Unlike the Phoenix, though, it didn't rise, it sank.

Sinking a moth balled WWII Light Cruiser in 1982... is a heroic victory to the briddish! So pathetic!
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,948
1,910
113
And they with the other allies saved your butts

No, they didn't. How many times do you have to be told that Britain would have won the war without America?

And I've already posted that America's participation in WWII has been grossly exaggerated by American historians and, therefore, the American people (and WWII isn't the only part of American history which has been heavily romanticised and changed to make America appear better than it actually is), ever since the war ended. Just a quarter of all Allied troops throughout the war were Americans, and those American troops could easily have been replaced by troops from other nations. And, as I've also pointed out, America was Britain's junior partner - not vice versa - in the conflict ever since America entered it in 1941 all the way until 1944. The amount of troops you had in the field were originally miniscule compared to Great Britain.


in a war that the Briddish and French started.

Germany started WWII by invading much of Continental Europe, along with Japan's invasion of China.

The Danes were ALL OVER England. Having their way as they pleased.

The amount of countries that Denmark invaded was miniscule compared to the amount that Britain invaded. I thhink we had the last laugh on the score.

And, of course, the Danes would be speaking German now had Britain not liberated them in WWII.

The US, Canada, and the Anzacs carried the weight of the Anglo- Allied Alliance. The brits were subordinates.

They most certainly didn't. Between December 1941 (when the US belatedly entered the war after being caught by surprise by the Japs) and 1944 Britain had more troops fighting WWII than the USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand PUT TOGETHER. Britain had ten times as many troops in the field initially as the US had. YOU were the junior partners of Great Britain.

US Eagle Squadrons were the vanguard of the RAF

How many times do I have to point out that there were a total of 250 Yanks in the Eagle Squadrons, out of a total RAF manpower of 250,000? In terms of manpower, the Eagle Squadrons constituted just one-thousandth of the total RAF.


A few dogfights won by the allied air forces was all it was.

It was the second-biggest aerial battle of WWII, which Britain fought and won when it was taking on Nazi Germany all by itself and which, by the way, was the FIRST major defeat of Nazi Germany in the whole war.

The brits never would have been able to stave off an invasion by the Nazis.

It's too late. It happened. Britain's victory in the Battle of Britain when it was alone fighting Germany meant that Britain fought off the threat of a German invasion. Operation Sea Lion was Germany's plan to invade Britain. For any likelihood of success, however, the operation required both air and naval superiority over the English Channel, neither of which the Germans ever achieved during or after the Battle of Britain. Sea Lion was postponed indefinitely on 17th September 1940 and never carried out. The failure of Germany to achieve its objectives of destroying Britain's air defences, or forcing Britain to negotiate an armistice or even an outright surrender, is considered its first major defeat and a crucial turning point in the Second World War.


It was Operation Barbarossa that kept the Germans from whipping your butts entirely.

I'm afraid it was the Battle of Britain, a great British victory and Gdermany's first major defeat of the war, which staved off a German invasion of Britain - and that was, of course, before America was even in the war and when anti-Semitic American businessmen like Ford were making lucrative business deals with Hitler.


Comparing the Battle of Britain dogfights over a period of months to the Battle of Kursk! LMAO


Of course, the Battle of Britain isn't seen as important to the Yanks, because you lot were sitting on your arses doing nothing in 1940 (except major American companies like Ford, who were sucking up to Hitler). You weren't in danger of an invasion. But the battle was VERY important to the British, who needed to win it to stave of a German invasion. To be honest, I think it's a disgrace that you belittle the Battle of Britain and see it as a mere "skirmish" when, for the British nation, it was a battle for complete and utter national survival, which was taking place when the Americans were sitting pretty with no danger whatsoever doing little cushy business deals with the Germans.


Changing your tune eh! :)

The Germans thumped the Brit navy at Jutland.

Not according to the historians, they didn't.


Sinking a moth balled WWII Light Cruiser in 1982... is a heroic victory to the briddish! So pathetic!

Had it been an American submarine which sank it they would all have been American heroes, and you'd been lavishing praise on them. I think you're jealous that the US Navy hasn't sunk an enemy warship more recently than the lst time the Royal Navy did it.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
The Brittish didn't stand a hope of beating the Nazis without North Americas help. Just the supply convoys alone kept you guys going, never mind the troops. As I side benefit, the Allied partners left a lot of their DNA over there which helped out the Brittish in ways we are only now discovering.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Had it been an American submarine which sank it they would all have been American heroes, and you'd been lavishing praise on them. I think you're jealous that the US Navy hasn't sunk an enemy warship more recently than the lst time the Royal Navy did it.

Wrong again dingbat!

Operation Praying Mantis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And the Argentinians sank how many Brit ships?

No, they didn't. How many times do you have to be told that Britain would have won the war without America?

They couldn't and didn't. Facts are facts and you don't have them.

And I've already posted that America's participation in WWII has been grossly exaggerated by American historians and, therefore, the American people (and WWII isn't the only part of American history which has been heavily romanticised and changed to make America appear better than it actually is), ever since the war ended. Just a quarter of all Allied troops throughout the war were Americans, and those American troops could easily have been replaced by troops from other nations. And, as I've also pointed out, America was Britain's junior partner - not vice versa - in the conflict ever since America entered it in 1941 all the way until 1944. The amount of troops you had in the field were originally miniscule compared to Great Britain.

The brits were subordinate to the Americans. End of story.


Germany started WWII by invading much of Continental Europe, along with Japan's invasion of China.

The Briddish and French declared war. France lost their country and the Brits were driven into the English Channel... literally. They did not cross again successfully until they were led by the Americans. The Canadians were the ones that anchored the Brit beachheads and kept the Germans at bay in their sector while the brits walked ashore upright and brewed tea.



The amount of countries that Denmark invaded was miniscule compared to the amount that Britain invaded. I thhink we had the last laugh on the score.

Such a sore spot to the Brits even today.

The Danes made quick work of the brits. I bet you have A LOT of Dane in your blood.


They most certainly didn't. Between December 1941 (when the US belatedly entered the war after being caught by surprise by the Japs) and 1944 Britain had more troops fighting WWII than the USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand PUT TOGETHER. Britain had ten times as many troops in the field initially as the US had. YOU were the junior partners of Great Britain.

Facts are facts... Ike was in charge and Monty was his incompetent political lackey.


How many times do I have to point out that there were a total of 250 Yanks in the Eagle Squadrons, out of a total RAF manpower of 250,000? In terms of manpower, the Eagle Squadrons constituted just one-thousandth of the total RAF.

And we weren't even in the war! And the US along with the other Brit allies saved Britain. How embarrassing.


It was the second-biggest aerial battle of WWII, which Britain fought and won when it was taking on Nazi Germany all by itself and which, by the way, was the FIRST major defeat of Nazi Germany in the whole war.



It's too late. It happened. Britain's victory in the Battle of Britain when it was alone fighting Germany meant that Britain fought off the threat of a German invasion. Operation Sea Lion was Germany's plan to invade Britain. For any likelihood of success, however, the operation required both air and naval superiority over the English Channel, neither of which the Germans ever achieved during or after the Battle of Britain. Sea Lion was postponed indefinitely on 17th September 1940 and never carried out. The failure of Germany to achieve its objectives of destroying Britain's air defences, or forcing Britain to negotiate an armistice or even an outright surrender, is considered its first major defeat and a crucial turning point in the Second World War.

Brits could never do it alone. You needed every Commonwealth nation and the U.S to save your butts.




I'm afraid it was the Battle of Britain, a great British victory and Gdermany's first major defeat of the war, which staved off a German invasion of Britain - and that was, of course, before America was even in the war and when anti-Semitic American businessmen like Ford were making lucrative business deals with Hitler.

Eagle Squadrons... BOOM!


Of course, the Battle of Britain isn't seen as important to the Yanks, because you lot were sitting on your arses doing nothing in 1940 (except major American companies like Ford, who were sucking up to Hitler). You weren't in danger of an invasion. But the battle was VERY important to the British, who needed to win it to stave of a German invasion. To be honest, I think it's a disgrace that you belittle the Battle of Britain and see it as a mere "skirmish" when, for the British nation, it was a battle for complete and utter national survival, which was taking place when the Americans were sitting pretty with no danger whatsoever doing little cushy business deals with the Germans.

More revisionism.


Had it been an American submarine which sank it they would all have been American heroes, and you'd been lavishing praise on them. I think you're jealous that the US Navy hasn't sunk an enemy warship more recently than the lst time the Royal Navy did it.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,848
14,419
113
Low Earth Orbit
The Canadians

Britain stood alone in the front line, alone and suddenly majestic. Her only allies, the faraway countries of the Commonwealth, worked frantically to help avert disaster, thankful that at least some of their strength was in the British Isles. Canada had her 1st Division there and in August sent part of her 2nd. To two army cooperation squadrons of tiny Lysanders she added the Hurricanes of No. 1 Fighter Squadron of the RCAF. Off the coasts of Britain, a few Canadian destroyers prowled.

Because the British Army had lost so much equipment at Dunkirk, General McNaughton's 1st Canadian Division was for a period the only whole and reasonably well-equipped infantry division in the country. Even it had suffered heavy equipment and transport losses in its foray into Brittany in June. The Canadian division was given the task of multiplying itself into an army for the benefit of German Intelligence. Its men were marched and counter-marched across southern England to create the illusion of vast forces on the move, and the weary soldiers came to call themselves MeNaughton's Flying Circus.

Britain's epic battle was to be fought not on the ground, however, but in the air. Before operation Sea Lion could be launched, the RAF had to be wiped from the skies.

By far the largest number of defenders were British, but fighter pilots of many other nations flew with them, including some 80 Canadians. Of these, 26 were in the RCAF's No. 1 Squadron, which arrived soon after Dunkirk; 16 flew as a team in the RAF's 242 "Canadian" Squadron; the rest were scattered among a dozen other RAF squadrons. These last included men such as PO. Johnnie Bryson, an ex-Mountie; Flt. Lt. Johnnie Kent of Winnipeg, who flew with the Poles in 303 Squadron; and FO. W. H. Nelson, who served in 74 Squadron with the South African ace Adolph "Sailor" Malan. Another 200 Canadian airmen fought in RAF Bomber and Coastal commands, which throughout the battle pounded at German invasion ports and other targets; 27 of them gave their lives.

On July 11, the second day of the battle, the Canadians suffered their first fighter casualty. In a Luftwaffe attack on the naval base at Portland, PO. D. A. Hewitt of Saint John, N.B., hurled his 501 Squadron Hurricane at a Dornier bomber and was hit himself. Gushing smoke, his plane plunged into the sea. Another Canadian pilot, Richard Howley, died eight days later; two more, A. W. Smith and Hugh Tamblyn, had narrow escapes. All were in 141 Squadron and flew the Defiant, a two-seater hunchback with a large power-operated gun turret which bulged its lines and crippled its speed.

After their fighting in France, the pilots of the badly-mauled RAF 242 "Canadian" Squadron were re-forming at Coltishall, near Norwich, where they became part of 12 Group guarding the industrial Md lands; 11 Group held the front line to the south. The Canadians were awaiting a new CO, Douglas Bader. A peacetime RAF pilot, Bader had lost both legs in an air crash in 1931, had been fitted with artificial limbs and had taught himself not only to walk without a stick but also to play golf, tennis and squash. When war came, he'd badgered his way back into the RAF and proved he could fly as well as any pilot. Now, in his first command, Bader was deterrnined to make 242 the best squadron in the RAF. But it might be a battle - the Canadians, he was told, were a wild lot and a tough bunch to lead.

When the Battle of Britain ended the overall score was 1733 German aircraft destroyed for a loss of 915 British fighter aircraft. The 42 Canadian fighter pilots of No. 1 RCAF and 242 Squadron had destroyed an estimated 60, had at least another 50 probably destroyed or damaged. Canadians flying with other fighter squadrons had done equally well. From July 10 to October 31, the dates officially recognized as the opening and closing of the battle, 20 Canadian fighter pilots died in action. Of these, three served with No. 1 Squadron RCAF, three with 242 Squadron the remainder with other RAF squadrons. As Churchill wrote: ". . . the stamina and valor of our fighter pilots remained unconquerable and supreme. Thus Britain was saved. Well might I say in the House of Commons that;
Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few...
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,442
9,587
113
Washington DC
The Canadians

Britain stood alone in the front line, alone and suddenly majestic. Her only allies, the faraway countries of the Commonwealth, worked frantically to help avert disaster, thankful that at least some of their strength was in the British Isles. Canada had her 1st Division there and in August sent part of her 2nd. To two army cooperation squadrons of tiny Lysanders she added the Hurricanes of No. 1 Fighter Squadron of the RCAF. Off the coasts of Britain, a few Canadian destroyers prowled.

Because the British Army had lost so much equipment at Dunkirk, General McNaughton's 1st Canadian Division was for a period the only whole and reasonably well-equipped infantry division in the country. Even it had suffered heavy equipment and transport losses in its foray into Brittany in June. The Canadian division was given the task of multiplying itself into an army for the benefit of German Intelligence. Its men were marched and counter-marched across southern England to create the illusion of vast forces on the move, and the weary soldiers came to call themselves MeNaughton's Flying Circus.
You mean. . . Britain's laughable, clownish incompetence left it standing with it's d*ck in the wind, covered only by the hat of the 1st Canadian?

Oh dear, that's not at all in accordance with the village idiot's "we done it all by ourselfs" narrative (or should I say fantasy?).
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
power vacuum Obama created by prematurely withdrawing US forces from Iraq


Laughable.

After ten years, thousands of Americans troops killed or maimed, over a trillion dollars wasted, democratic elections, and the so called "coalition" forces, Obama caused a "premature" withdrawal??? Obviously someone is seeking to profit from the continuation of this needless war.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Absolutely. The Brits were so thoroughly whipped on the continent, driven into the sea and only the Canadians were in place ready to defend the hapless Briddish.

The brits would have starved if it was not for N. America and it's convoys. We even took in their children because they could not protect them.