Richest 1% own 50 percent of world wealth- Credit Suisse report

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
What happened to "know thy enemy"?
They turned out to be the ones with the 'no stabbing in the back' rule, just before they stabbed you in the back. Shouldn't the rule be, how would I do this if I was a prick' and then watch for the same signs that would be there and that will help you see what others are up to as actions and words blend together rather than collide.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,994
14,442
113
Low Earth Orbit
They turned out to be the ones with the 'no stabbing in the back' rule, just before they stabbed you in the back. Shouldn't the rule be, how would I do this if I was a prick' and then watch for the same signs that would be there and that will help you see what others are up to as actions and words blend together rather than collide.

Why didn't the Occupy types buy shares in their enemy so they can partake in directiing evil corp llc?
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
FFS Megs...
. . . and then you are supposed to suggest the plan that you think would work better and if you don't have one you can't say 'leave it to the experts' because you don't know where I got my info from.
Like you understood even that much. lol Go ahead, ask any wealthy person if hobbies and vacations are fun? Give me $500M (broke for an exiled Rothschild member) and some co-op from Iran and I could build a chain of Ski-lodges that could have big jets landing high in the mountains and the two weeks they are there they see 10 different lodges and they ski all the way between them. There would also be a 45 day package that would be the same in that a new spot every night. If the globe had some vacationers the place would be packed year round.
How many things would get invented when every homeowner had a garage and the money to stock it up. I don't expect any of that to happen but the money is there it only has to be redirected. Banking should be their only business, that means the 51% of Wall Street that they own would be sold off and the workers in the companies would become the owners. There are a few more items such as land and art that might be the biggest haul, I mean inventory' of all. The world is not short of money and the general public would not choose war as the best way to spend it.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,994
14,442
113
Low Earth Orbit
LMFAO...buy a share or two and fight them from the inside all while getting paid your cut of the Rothschild profits.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Why didn't the Occupy types buy shares in their enemy so they can partake in directiing evil corp llc?
Not enough are ever made available 'to the public' that they could ever control any votes at the highest levels. Having the Janitor get a bonus of $100,000 for saving 3x that much in cleaning supplies is how that part should work. The days when the majority need taking care of was when they didn't have all the info that the elite did. That doesn't hold true anymore. The votes in 1867 and today would be the same as they were referendums. Issues like UN 181 should also have been in referendum form if you wanted a true view on how Canadians felt about that issue. That choice wasn't available or practical back then, that doesn't hold true today as doing taxes is now a do it from home in 1/2 an hour kind of thing. Would the Quebec Referendum have had a different result if all of Canada had e-voted on it?

LMFAO...buy a share or two and fight them from the inside all while getting paid your cut of the Rothschild profits.
Limiting it to 5% from 105% is not cutting them off, it is a reduction and why does that concept upset you so much. Is $500M / year just not enough when you are used to $500B / year. How many doughnuts can you eat in that same time? If the lower amount isn't enough then you need to lean how to budget. Even with hookers and heroin at their present rates you would still have some change at the end of the year.
 

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
The concept of a few elite direction the path society takes is the best method but that theme is thought up and promoted by the ones currently in charge. The gap bewteen the richest and the poorest is out of whack, it doesn't matter what else you do if that isn't put into balance they suicide would be the next best option to perpetual pain. The elite don't even see a drop in their yearly lifestyle, all they see is what they can't spend in a year go back into a fund that gets divided up among the poorest on the planet. If everybody had food and shelter then they have time for leisure and hobbies. Hobbies are where the R%D would come from.

Okay Walter, what did I say about hobbies that pissed you off?

A lot of the problem for the poorest is our ability to actually get the aid to them. It isn't a matter of just evening things out. We have poured billions and billions into Africa as a continent yet still there exists some of the worst conditions of slavery, torture and dire poverty on the face of the earth. Governments and power shift in those countries over night.

Food, shelter, water, safety basic human rights.
Not everyone thinks they should share. Others pour their own billions into the betterment of the planet.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,994
14,442
113
Low Earth Orbit
A lot of the problem for the poorest is our ability to actually get the aid to them. It isn't a matter of just evening things out. We have poured billions and billions into Africa as a continent yet still there exists some of the worst conditions of slavery, torture and dire poverty on the face of the earth. Governments and power shift in those countries over night.

Food, shelter, water, safety basic human rights.
Not everyone thinks they should share. Others pour their own billions into the betterment of the planet.

Colonial Africa was better?
 

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC
You do understand why gvts allow lower rates for Cap Gains, right?

... Something to do with spurring growth and investment in companies that actually employ people




That'll fix everything

Sounds like Reaganomic trickle down theory. Look what it's created.. greed driven free market chaos.. that is destroying the middle class.. enslaving millions in squalid Maquiladora Free Trade Zones.. and making a small group of parasitic traders and financiers grotesquely rich.

None of them produce anything constructive while cynically promoting a fiction that they are actually generating 'wealth'.. and somehow are a 'gift' to the less 'enterpising'.

It's all part of the Free Market, University of Chicago school of economics that is in charge the world's economy.. especially through its supranational organisms in the IMF, WTO, World Bank.. the three witches at the Global Free Market cauldren.

Reagan had an excuse.. he was a moron. But there was and is a far more insidious clique behind him intent on establishing a slave culture of a tiny cabal of haves and and a gigantic pool of desperate have nots in the world from which they will profit.
 
Last edited:

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
Colonial Africa was better?

It was a different world back then. I don't know if it was better or not...it was certainly very very different than it is today. To discuss it from that perspective I think you would need to narrow the discussion, you would have to examine each country, it's economic and government history.

There are many parts of Africa where things are much much better than they ever were. Other countries I would say no.

From friends that have escaped totalitarian regimes they have a very very different take on freedom/poverty than we do here in the west. So there is also a cultural bias that we must take into account.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
A lot of the problem for the poorest is our ability to actually get the aid to them. It isn't a matter of just evening things out. We have poured billions and billions into Africa as a continent yet still there exists some of the worst conditions of slavery, torture and dire poverty on the face of the earth. Governments and power shift in those countries over night.

Food, shelter, water, safety basic human rights.
Not everyone thinks they should share. Others pour their own billions into the betterment of the planet.

There is a massive difference between 'sharing' and gvt legislation that makes winners and losers.

Gates, through the charitable group that he and others fund is 'sharing'.... An unwarranted demand from the public, legislated through gvt that forces an increasing disproportionate share of income tax is not 'sharing'

Sounds like Reaganomic trickle down theory. Look what it's created.. greed driven free market chaos.. that is destroying the middle class.. enslaving millions in squalid Maquiladora Free Trade Zones.. and making a small group of parasitic traders and financiers grotesquely rich.

None of them produce anything constructive while cynically promoting a fiction that they are actually generating 'wealth'.. and somehow are a 'gift' to the less 'enterpising'.

It's all part of the Free Market, University of Chicago school of economics that is in charge the world's economy.. especially through its supranational organisms in the IMF, WTO, World Bank.. the three witches at the Global Free Market cauldren.

Reagan had an excuse.. he was a moron. But there was and is a far more insidious clique behind him intent on establishing a slave culture of a tiny cabal of haves and and a gigantic pool of desperate have nots in the world from which they will profit.

I get such a kick outta the pseudo-Marxist philosophy that relies on cherry-picking select generalizations and ignoring the herd of elephants in the room.

Your globalization-is-evil rant has no merit whatsoever based on the reality that I can source, on the same street, equal products/services for a range of prices.... You call that healthy competition, but the second that the playing field extends from one street to nations, it magically becomes eeeeevil.

Think for one moment on your baseless rant about the pressures that you force into the marketplace... You demand more money for the work you do... Followed-up with demands for cheaper products (under the guise of 'rights')... And then bitch that some enterprise delivers on your various demands by providing cheaper products by virtue of outsourcing.

The position you support is founded on surreal assumptions on top of unrealistic expectations all wrapped-up in your own form of greed.

That said, please don't sell me this horse sh*t about the dangers of capitalism and globalisation when in fact you are the very source of the pressures
 

Nuggler

kind and gentle
Feb 27, 2006
11,596
141
63
Backwater, Ontario.
omg that was a coffee choke...

not against you Pete but that was timely/funny

what is ffs?

Definitely not against Peter. I'm just a wisea s s. :lol:

Got another red from Wally, so it's all good.;-)

I fully agree but there is a limited number of those types of jobs. Someone has to be a butcher and baker and candle stick maker.




Even at $30 an hour (for sake of argument) that's going to take close to 7,000 hours a year, don't leave much time for sleeping.


My company is doing way better since we switched from candlesticks to battery powered *****s. Baking, bout the same. Butchering could be ok, but I'm far to old to join ISIS......*battery powered d i l d o s....FFS...........way to ruin a punch line, CC.

You rich, you got richer problems. No thanks.