There is a massive difference between 'sharing' and gvt legislation that makes winners and losers.
Gates, through the charitable group that he and others fund is 'sharing'.... An unwarranted demand from the public, legislated through gvt that forces an increasing disproportionate share of income tax is not 'sharing'
I get such a kick outta the pseudo-Marxist philosophy that relies on cherry-picking select generalizations and ignoring the herd of elephants in the room.
Your globalization-is-evil rant has no merit whatsoever based on the reality that I can source, on the same street, equal products/services for a range of prices.... You call that healthy competition, but the second that the playing field extends from one street to nations, it magically becomes eeeeevil.
Think for one moment on your baseless rant about the pressures that you force into the marketplace... You demand more money for the work you do... Followed-up with demands for cheaper products (under the guise of 'rights')... And then bitch that some enterprise delivers on your various demands by providing cheaper products by virtue of outsourcing.
The position you support is founded on surreal assumptions on top of unrealistic expectations all wrapped-up in your own form of greed.
That said, please don't sell me this horse sh*t about the dangers of capitalism and globalisation when in fact you are the very source of the pressures