Script? Are you referring to Paradise Lost?
No A New American Century. The NeoCon classic. I don't think it'll be a century though.
Script? Are you referring to Paradise Lost?
Al Qaeda has disowned ISIS as they are more evil and crazy that Al Qaeda..
Nailing Iraq Soldiers to crosses and beating them to death.. you think Islam is crazy, let these guys get a foothold in the Middle East...
![]()
The Saudis do it and the US is friends with them for some reason.
Provide a link, proof please.. thx
The invisible sheikh: mysterious leader of Isis considered the new bin Laden
![]()
Such lovely people to be friends with.
The Irainians know the Israelis are behind the revolt, they will smother the insurrection and blunt the opening of Israels assault.
Blah blah blah missing the point
You know you really need to stop smoking that cheap home grown weed. By some BC weed, and sure Cliffy can point you in the right direction.. :lol:
The funny part is that when Obama was taking credit for getting us out of Iraq, the Obama-haters were screeching that he was only following the timetable Bush put in place before he left office. Now that things are coming apart, the Obama-haters have completely forgotten that Obama was following Bush's timetable.
Not surprising. ODS leaves little cranial capacity for anything like facts.
What Iraq needs is an iron-fisted leader who can take on Islamic terrorists and insurgents.
It was plain as day from even before the start of Gulf War II that a war in Iraq would just create more terrorists. Democrats and Republicans who supported war did so because it was politically expedient in the short term. It was classic groupthink. Whether politicians believed it or not they supported and rubber stamped any fight in the Middle East in fear of being unpatriotic or weak on terrorism in the freshly post 9/11 era. Even news media were afraid to ask tough questions. Meanwhile most of the rest of the world told the US, and Britain, they were nuts. The rest of the world was right, they were nuts.
Please don't feel that this flare up in Iraq is a big surprise. Whatcha want to do, go in there and occupy it for the next 50 years at 50-100 billion a month? Throw more money at the exercise in futility?
The destruction of Iraq is happening on Obama's watch. According to the rules of the political culture in the USA that makes Obama responsible.
My habits give you no advantage Booger.
What Iraq needs is an iron-fisted leader who can take on Islamic terrorists and insurgents.
It was plain as day from even before the start of Gulf War II that a war in Iraq would just create more terrorists. Democrats and Republicans who supported war did so because it was politically expedient in the short term. It was classic groupthink. Whether politicians believed it or not they supported and rubber stamped any fight in the Middle East in fear of being unpatriotic or weak on terrorism in the freshly post 9/11 era. Even news media were afraid to ask tough questions. Meanwhile most of the rest of the world told the US, and Britain, they were nuts. The rest of the world was right, they were nuts.
Please don't feel that this flare up in Iraq is a big surprise. Whatcha want to do, go in there and occupy it for the next 50 years at 50-100 billion a month? Throw more money at the exercise in futility?
As conservatives always say, pouring money into a problem won't solve it. It's time for them to practice what they preach and demand withdrawal and defunding, not further incursion and more wastage of money.
The idiots are those who cheered on the needless destruction of Iraq in the first place.