Obama will follow the script like the good actor he is.
Script? Are you referring to Paradise Lost?
Obama will follow the script like the good actor he is.
In defense of Dubya (yes, really)
He was in power for 8 months when 9-11 happened........I think the failure to deal with Osama et al hardly rests with him alone.
Saddam Hussein was a looney who ignored the cease-fire signed 10 years before. WMDs or no, there were LOTS of reasons to whack Iraq.......that said, the Americans failed to foresee a continuing insurrection, as they firmly believe EVERYONE wants to be an American at heart, and they are wrong.
They really had no other option with Afghanistan. As, in a few years, they will have no other option but to re-invade Iraq.....unless, of course, the lunatic Islamists get all obsessed with their own war, and Iraq (Sunni) and Iran (Shia) go at it yet again. It is an awful thing when the best possible future is never-ending bloody war.
Yeah, he flopped big time on Katrina.
Dubya was not malicious, he just wasn't up to the job. He was, even at that, much more competent than Obama. Like I said, he may have started the wars, he did not LOSE them.......
Oh, as for the economy, you should check out who deregulated Wall Street (Clinton) and who co-sponsored a (failed) bill to re-regulate the Wall Street Scum (McCain),
There were plenty of reasons to invade Iraq. None of them were Bush's stated reason (WMDs) or his actual reasons (government contracts for his friends).
Revisionists (see your mirror) consistently forget that the belief in the existence of Saddam's WMDs was extremely widespread (think in terms of the 97% GW consensus) for three reasons
1. he gassed the Kurds during the Iran-Iraq War.
2. he was breaking every part of the cease-fire agreement
3. by his own admission, he was trying to make Iran believe he had WMD.
As for Bush's actual reasons, I think he felt (correctly) it was a job left undone, he believed in WMD, and the Iraqis had plotted to kill his Pa. That made it personal. Dubya IS a Texan, you know.
Just overwhelmed by the circumstances.
I would like to draw something to the attention of all the folks who blindly love Comrade Obama. Blaming Bush may be emotionally satisfying, but it fails to deal with the inexorable hand of external reality.
External reality has permitted the rise of ever more virulent forms of Islamism. ISIS, Boko Haram, Abu Sayyef, Al Qaeda in the Islamic Magreb, et al. exist, are metastasizing, and reaching critical mass. This is happening right now.
Revisionists (see your mirror) consistently forget that the belief in the existence of Saddam's WMDs was extremely widespread (think in terms of the 97% GW consensus) for three reasons
1. he gassed the Kurds during the Iran-Iraq War.
2. he was breaking every part of the cease-fire agreement
3. by his own admission, he was trying to make Iran believe he had WMD.
As for Bush's actual reasons, I think he felt (correctly) it was a job left undone, he believed in WMD, and the Iraqis had plotted to kill his Pa. That made it personal. Dubya IS a Texan, you know.
There was much Dubya did I do not like (see the Patriot Act, rendition, torture, and the massive security apparatus in the USA) but I do not see him as an evil man.
Just overwhelmed by the circumstances.
But it's you guys that keep perpetuating the conversational. If Obama takes a crap you immediately point out that he failed to take a good one. If you don't want to read comparisons then don't start them.I would like to draw something to the attention of all the folks who blindly love Comrade Obama. Blaming Bush may be emotionally satisfying, but it fails to deal with the inexorable hand of external reality.
External reality has permitted the rise of ever more virulent forms of Islamism. ISIS, Boko Haram, Abu Sayyef, Al Qaeda in the Islamic Magreb, et al. exist, are metastasizing, and reaching critical mass. This is happening right now.
Barack Obama is the President of the United States of America at this moment in history. He wanted the job. Now that he has the job he is obligated to determine the best course of action, and to act effectively to protect the lives of his people, their friends and allies, and to preserve their well being. None of those obligations can be accomplished by blaming the errors of George W. Bush.
Don't you all agree? Of course you do. You are compelled by logic expressed adroitly.
Oh right, I forgot one of the reasons he killed all those people was a **** measuring contest between him, his father and Saddam Hussein. Oh no, he's not an evil man. He's just willing to commit mass murder to satisfy his ego. Nothing wrong with that, eh? I've worked with people who were victims of George W Bush. I never thought to dismiss the murder and injury he caused with a joke about him being Texan. A bit that would have made them feel better.
But Obama just wants to destroy America.
Reasons yes- was it necessary?There were plenty of reasons to invade Iraq. None of them were Bush's stated reason (WMDs) or his actual reasons (government contracts for his friends).
I am sorry for the people you worked with, but if they are Iraqi, you need to understand that the people are ALWAYS responsible for their leaders
And Obama is destroying America through his incompetence.
Now they are dressed as civilians and mingling so now they don't know who to shoot
Yes poor poor Bush. Was he that friggin stupid that he could be manipulated so easily or couldn't make his own informed decisions as President.
If he couldn't keep a leash on his people either, than no matter how you look at it, he was a pretty bad leader.
In defense of Dubya (yes, really)
He was in power for 8 months when 9-11 happened........I think the failure to deal with Osama et al hardly rests with him alone.
Saddam Hussein was a looney who ignored the cease-fire signed 10 years before. WMDs or no, there were LOTS of reasons to whack Iraq.......that said, the Americans failed to foresee a continuing insurrection, as they firmly believe EVERYONE wants to be an American at heart, and they are wrong.
Script? Are you referring to Paradise Lost?
But it's you guys that keep perpetuating the conversational. If Obama takes a crap you immediately point out that he failed to take a good one. If you don't want to read comparisons then don't start them.
Fail to prevent the worst terrorist attack in American history.
Invade two countries without an plan; get the country bogged down two insurgencies with no end.
Use the war as an excuse to enrich his friends with government contracts. Blow trillions of dollars.
All of this actually fails to capture those responsible for the terrorist attack. Not give a ****.
As if thats ever stopped drones or bombers. Has the Iraqi government even asked for help? So far as Ive seen they haven't. They were the ones who wanted the US out in the first place.
Yes. The Iraqi Govt. has requested air strikes and other air support. Obama has turned them down.