The Queen: ‘Poor people and their problems don’t get reported often'
- Thread starter Blackleaf
- Start date
Funny how the rich find it so easy to comment on the lives of the poor when they haven't had a day in their lives when they've worried about getting enough food for their kids or paying for the roof over their heads. "Ah, the problem will be solved if we just donate enough money". 
Don't bother helping them find work or giving them some work. Can't get those hands roughened or thatsensitive skin dirty.
I suppose it must make them feel better about themselves or something.
Don't bother helping them find work or giving them some work. Can't get those hands roughened or thatsensitive skin dirty.I suppose it must make them feel better about themselves or something.
Yet says stuff like "At least get your spelling and grammar right in your rubbish", for instance. There should be a comma after the word, "you" and parentheses ")".
and yet says stuff such as, "At least get your spelling and grammar right in your rubbish". "for a reasons"? lol
uhuh We believe you where billions of others wouldn't.
Ain't that a fact! Royalty have been leeching off others for a very long time.
If, as Swift suggests, the upper classes ate the children of the poor, the Queen eventually could sleep tight.
There is an additional upside in that the children do not go to waste in any fashion whatsoever:
"Those who are more thrifty (as I must confess the times require) may flea the carcass; the skin of which, artificially dressed, will make admirable gloves for ladies, and summer boots for fine gentlemen."
Admirable gloves and boots for discriminating gentlemen... It really is a win-win all 'round
"Those who are more thrifty (as I must confess the times require) may flea the carcass; the skin of which, artificially dressed, will make admirable gloves for ladies, and summer boots for fine gentlemen."
Admirable gloves and boots for discriminating gentlemen... It really is a win-win all 'round
haha...good oneIf, as Swift suggests, the upper classes ate the children of the poor, the Queen eventually could sleep tight.
actually, dumba$$, the "Q" is capitalized in "Queen". Unless you are purposely showing disrespect for Her Majesty. Are you?
ROFLMFAO, must you show your ignorance in damn near every post? You are a citizen of your country, you are a subject of Her Royal Highness Queen Elizabeth II.
What with all this emphasis on grammar and spelling, I just had to look up "highness" in the dictionary. Until today I had always spelt "highness" with an "a" instead of an "e".
Her Highness is the richest woman on the planet. The petitions from the poor mustn't be getting through. The Royal Mail has failed her. I'm sure that were she informed she would of course open her vaults to feed her needy subjects, or at least transport them overseas to the colonies where they could get jobs with major news organizations.
I know it is. I've got a GCSE in English Language.
I'm not a subject. I'm a citizen. You, as a Canadian, may be a subject. But I, as a Briton, am not.
It is "Her Majesty", not "Her Highness".
The world's richest woman is Christy Walton, the widow of one of the sons of the founder of Wal-Mart, with a US$36.7 billion (£22.3 billion) fortune.
Why not? You have Elizabeth II as your Head of State. If the British are subjects then so are the Canadians.
You are a subject, in fact that is the nice word to use... Essentially, you exist solely to be a footstep upon which your betters can use to move upwards in the world.
Get used to it
The way we pronounce it in Canada is : "Old Crone " as in, 'outta my way you old crone, the game is about to start'
You remember that... Walton can buy and sell your little Island at her pleasure.
I believe that she would make a fine Queen
Last edited:
Noooooope. Not since 1946. Same goes for you. You are a citizen and not a subject.