Electric Fossilization

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
The Jurassic Coast – a Transmutation Extinction?

Posted on March 5, 2014 by Peter Mungo Jupp
Jurassic Coast ammonite fossils. Credit: Whitby museum.


Mar 05, 2014
Ammonites look like a squid with a shell, and are now extinct.
Paleontologists claim they lived between 400 million and 66 million years ago. Fossil ages are usually determined by the ages of the rock layers in which they’re embedded. What caused their mass extinction, and what fossilized their numerous remains?
We went down to the old fishing port of Lyme Regis in Southern England to dig into the theories used as explanations for their demise. This “Jurassic Coast” is renowned as a fossil collectors paradise. But the questions that leap at you as you study the acres of buried fossils is more exciting than the intricate appeal of the Nautilus shaped shells! How on earth did millions of squid-like marine creatures get submerged in limestone rock? They are plainly visible, glaring up at you, from within this rocky beach plateau.
The ammonites have been mysteriously turned from watery marine bodies to rock. Incredibly, they are encased in limestone, as if in the very act of swimming. In other parts of the world, they have been transformed into opals or even petrified into flint hard rock. Sectioning of the Ammonite fossils reveals their internal organs in minute detail. What force of nature transmuted these squid-like creatures into rock? It certainly must have been an instantaneous process, for what dies is quickly recycled unless some geological intervention occurs. That intervention petrifies biological matter, and is almost always connected to the cause of death. Not just one fossil is found, but a vast mass extinction!
What tool of nature fossilized these once watery marine Ammonites? We have a powerful clue. Eric Milton describes his examination of a petrified tree trunk (essentially water and carbon) in Alberta, Canada:
“The piece was pure clear silica inside, it was coated with a rougher opaque crust of partially fused sand. The tree, whose stump was petrified, was alive five years ago! After the tree was cut down to accommodate the right of way for a new power transmission line, an accidental break allowed the live high-voltage wire to contact several tree stumps still in the ground. The power was cut off within hours of the break. All of the tree roots which contacted the broken wire were fossilized.”
Obviously, extremes of electricity can metamorphose matter quickly.
As much as we stretch our credibility to explain fossilization and petrification of watery, living animals, there is a bigger question. What about the medium these very animals are preserved in?
In Hot Springs, South Dakota, mammoths and many other animals are found immersed in micro-layers of limestone. As paleontologist Dr. Larry Agenbroad explained to me, the mammoths themselves are barely distinguishable from the medium they are immersed in. Micro-layers of limestone permeate down the entire 100 foot deep mass of this volumetric disaster. If this was an electric plasma discharge event, how did it cause this amazing layering in an instant? It is plain that no slow deposition of layers was involved, otherwise the animals would have biologically deteriorated before being buried. This is still an unanswered question. Nevertheless rapid burial seems to be a prerequisite to preservation.
A similar case study exists with the Jurassic Coast Ammonites. These marine creatures of all sizes, (up to 5 feet across) were buried instantaneously in a calcium medium (limestone is calcium carbonate). It is then we begin to speculate: could the medium in which the fossils were originally found become subject to the same transformation process as the fossils themselves? Could plasma discharge change water into limestone? Big question with only speculation as the answer. But let’s go through the chemistry.
H2O, or water, is two elements, hydrogen and oxygen, with 10 protons. Calcium, (the basic stuff of limestone) has a proton count (or, atomic number) of 20. This is twice that of water. All that is theoretically needed to convert water to calcium is an abundance of neutrons. Lightning discharge is recorded as producing an abundance of neutrons. Feasible? Yes. Possible? Maybe, but certainly a trail to be investigated. Transmutation by plasma discharge events, and or plasmoid production from cosmic events, is a pioneering field waiting and ready to unravel geological upheavals.
Peter Mungo Jupphttp://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2014/03/05/the-jurassic-coast-a-transmutation-extinction/
 

BornRuff

Time Out
Nov 17, 2013
3,175
0
36
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
58,004
8,295
113
Washington DC
The Jurassic Coast – a Transmutation Extinction?

Posted on March 5, 2014 by Peter Mungo Jupp
Jurassic Coast ammonite fossils. Credit: Whitby museum.


Mar 05, 2014
Ammonites look like a squid with a shell, and are now extinct.
They are not! They were rounded up by the government and are being held in a secret detention facility in Wyoming.

You're clearly part of the plot.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
But let’s go through the chemistry. H2O, or water, is two elements, hydrogen and oxygen, with 10 protons. Calcium, (the basic stuff of limestone) has a proton count (or, atomic number) of 20. This is twice that of water. All that is theoretically needed to convert water to calcium is an abundance of neutrons. Lightning discharge is recorded as producing an abundance of neutrons. Feasible? Yes.
No. First, that's not chemistry he's talking about, it's nuclear fusion. Fusing hydrogen and oxygen to make calcium requires temperatures and pressures such as are found in the core of a star, it takes a lot more than just an abundance of neutrons. Third, lightning produces a small number of slow neutrons, completely inadequate to the task anyway. You need fast neutrons to get a reaction going, and they'd be far more likely to fission the oxygen into lighter elements. That's probably the most ignorant and stupid claim I've ever seen you post from the thunderbolt crowd.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
You are completely mistaken and as usual and guilty of gross exageration bordering on clinical loonyness. It can't possibly be the most ignorant and stupid thing I've ever posted here. I urge you to review the complete collection of my contributions. I'm sure you will recant. I think you owe the members here an apology for your spurious and inaccurate protestations.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Electric Geology - Electric Universe Theory videos

http://principia-scientific.org/publications/PSI_Miatello_Refutation_GHE.pdf

REFUTATION OF THE “GREENHOUSE EFFECT” THEORY ON ATHERMODYNAMIC AND HYDROSTATIC BASIS.
Alberto Miatello

I'll agree with that. It's up there with the best of them, though.
Or just peruse Thunderbolts.org for other inane hypotheses.

I would love to know how you determine the inanity of the work. You will someday share a humble pie with the demon Sinister.


About

Ancient Destructions and the Archaeologist
Peter ‘Mungo’ Jupp is the author of the series. He is an Australian archaeologist with a passion not to follow traditions in archaeology. Peter does not think archaeology involves being ‘thrilled’ by dusting off broken pots and bones. What drives him is a passion to ask questions about civilisations and huge constructions that were suddenly smashed and just ‘disappeared’ from the face of Earth. He also questions how cosmic interference affected out planet.

Peter Jupp majored in Archaeology at the University of Melbourne and also attended the School of Creative Arts at Melbourne University where he studied film making techniques and production. Jupp’s inquisitive nature, and dedication to the mind’s love of logic and beauty has led him into an area of passion that seeks answers from many disciplines. Hence he has also studied Earth Sciences, Biology, Mythology and Art at a tertiary level.
In earlier years he studied Applied Chemistry at RMIT, and later lectured in Medical Imaging at the Sydney University School of Radiology. The resulting culmination of knowledge in areas such as magnetic phenomena, chemistry and biology, as well as ancient history and mythology, powerfully informs his unique slant on archeology.
This keen interest in the life sciences has given Peter ‘Mungo’ Jupp an unusually broad based understanding of the human journey on our planet, and lends a fascinating edge to the storyline of his films. His sense of humor, musicality and creativity enrich these documentaries…. thus they are at once entertaining and informative, alternately seducing and provoking the viewer into fresh questioning of our human and cosmic history.
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
70
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
Electric Geology - Electric Universe Theory videos

http://principia-scientific.org/publications/PSI_Miatello_Refutation_GHE.pdf

REFUTATION OF THE “GREENHOUSE EFFECT” THEORY ON ATHERMODYNAMIC AND HYDROSTATIC BASIS.
Alberto Miatello



I would love to know how you determine the inanity of the work. You will someday share a humble pie with the demon Sinister.
I already showed you once. It was the mathematics showing under normal conditions, electrons do not exceed the speed of light, which was the opposite of what your thunderbolts claimed. To be exact, the condition under which they will exceed the speed of light is under quantum entanglement.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
I already showed you once. It was the mathematics showing under normal conditions, electrons do not exceed the speed of light, which was the opposite of what your thunderbolts claimed. To be exact, the condition under which they will exceed the speed of light is under quantum entanglement.

What normal conditions? The article dwells on abnormal conditions. Normally my toaster does not fossilize my slice of bread. If you can't mount an comprehensive argument please take your seat and stop eating the refreshments long enough to think for a few minutes.

No. First, that's not chemistry he's talking about, it's nuclear fusion. Fusing hydrogen and oxygen to make calcium requires temperatures and pressures such as are found in the core of a star, it takes a lot more than just an abundance of neutrons. Third, lightning produces a small number of slow neutrons, completely inadequate to the task anyway. You need fast neutrons to get a reaction going, and they'd be far more likely to fission the oxygen into lighter elements. That's probably the most ignorant and stupid claim I've ever seen you post from the thunderbolt crowd.

When was the core temperature of our star measured? Fusion makes fulgarites on earth every day. Lightening is a fusion bolt.
 
Last edited:

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
70
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
What normal conditions? The article dwells on abnormal conditions. Normally my toaster does not fossilize my slice of bread. If you can't mount an comprehensive argument please take your seat and stop eating the refreshments long enough to think for a few minutes.
Stop that. It was not about fossilisation. It was about some other ridiculous claim you posted months and months ago.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Why the Lower Corona of the Sun Is Hotter Than the Photosphere

Posted on January 17, 2014 by Prof. Donald E. Scott
Jan 17, 2014 The chaos of Brownian motion produces the high temperature we see in the solar corona. Of all the ideas offered up as being an explanation of the extreme temperature (more than 2 million Kelvin) measured in the …http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/201...na-of-the-sun-is-hotter-than-the-photosphere/

Stop that. It was not about fossilisation. It was about some other ridiculous claim you posted months and months ago.

So you have just the one all purpose refutation that fits any theory I might put forward?