Except nothing. They looked over all of the emails. Your side thought it had found a smoking gun, but it turned out to be nothing more than researchers venting frustrations in emails. The data was fine.
AGW was founded upon, and remains dependent on, the court of public opinion... When your buddies at East Anglia, IPCC and Al Gore were effective in rallying the public with emotionally charged rhetoric and flawed science, it was OK... Now that East Anglia and their raft of communications that detailed their intent is public, well, the public has withdrawn their support and slowly but surely, the movement is fading into oblivion.
The irony is palpable dontcha think?
Your revisionist attempts notwithstanding, the stolen emails were and are much ado about nothing.
The only revisionist action going on here is related to the suggestion that the current climate systems are somehow different from those observed over the last millions of years.
By the way; what are your thoughts on last year being the first year for an ice-free North?
I'm just going to keep referring to this post every time you say something along the lines of not one single accurate prediction:
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/n...rles-calls-climate-deniers-3.html#post1866608
How about you just admit that you haven't ever looked into this, instead of repeating such silly and easilly refutable claims?
A broken clock is still accurate twice a day
