Recall effort against Arizona's Sheriff Joe Arpaio fails

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
Hee, hee - yup, I was correct all along.

And there are still DOZENS of cases yet to be settled and the taxpayers of Arizona will be forced to fork over MILLIONS more. Naturally, the right wingers who all claim they oppose government intrusionism will be disappointed as they love tyrannical cops who abuse their authority.


REPENT YE TYRANTS!
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
Sheriff Joe Arpaio racial profiling costs taxpayers $21M






Taxpayers in metropolitan Phoenix are expected to pay out an estimated $21 million over the next year and a half for changes ordered in response to a court ruling that found an Arizona sheriff's office racially profiled Latinos in its regular traffic and immigration patrols.


Maricopa County also would have to pick up an additional $10 million in staff and other costs each year beginning in mid-2015 to comply with the judge's order against Sheriff Joe Arpaio's office.


According to the estimates, the county would pay $7.6 million for the remainder of the current fiscal year that ends June 30 and another $14.2 million in the following fiscal year. After that, it's expected to cost $10 million annually as long as the sheriff's office remains under the judge's order.


The costs include the expense of installing video cameras in hundreds of the agency's patrol vehicles, additional training to ensure officers aren't making unconstitutional arrests, and the salaries, benefits, vehicles and other operating costs for a seven-person team made up of sheriff's employees to help carry out the judge's order.


The people who filed the civil case against the sheriff's office didn't seek monetary damages and instead wanted a declaration that Arpaio's office engaged in racial profiling and an order that required it to make policy changes.


The county has already spent $1.6 million defending the sheriff's office in the case.


But attorneys who won the case have asked the judge to order the county to pay $7.3 million for legal fees and others costs that they incurred while litigating the case, a request that Arpaio's attorneys have called excessive and outrageous.


The judge hasn't yet ruled on that request.


Read more: Sheriff Joe Arpaio racial profiling costs taxpayers $21M
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
Joe Arpaio, America's most expensive sheriff


Joe Arpaio, America's most expensive sheriff

Our View: Antics are costing taxpayers millions






Commentators:


Arpaio has misappropriated and wasted at least $146 million bucks, between settlements, legal fees, and court-mandated compliance. This is not inclusive of settlements for wrongful death and those fees... and this is also not inclusive of outside legal fees paid to a myriad of high powered law firms ... in addition to the settlements and legal fees we've already covered, there's the matter of the $100M+ of taxpayer monies that, had they been spent as they were supposed to be - as it was sold to the voters - might have kept us out of this mess, but instead were spent on things that have led us directly to this mess. As a result the Maricopa County general fund is $100M lighter ... hundreds of thousands legal Mexicans with dollars to spend are no longer shopping in Phoenix because of Joe Arpio. One UofA study places that loss at over $500 millions dollars.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Joe Arpaio, America's most expensive sheriff


Joe Arpaio, America's most expensive sheriff

Our View: Antics are costing taxpayers millions






Commentators:


Arpaio has misappropriated and wasted at least $146 million bucks, between settlements, legal fees, and court-mandated compliance. This is not inclusive of settlements for wrongful death and those fees... and this is also not inclusive of outside legal fees paid to a myriad of high powered law firms ... in addition to the settlements and legal fees we've already covered, there's the matter of the $100M+ of taxpayer monies that, had they been spent as they were supposed to be - as it was sold to the voters - might have kept us out of this mess, but instead were spent on things that have led us directly to this mess. As a result the Maricopa County general fund is $100M lighter ... hundreds of thousands legal Mexicans with dollars to spend are no longer shopping in Phoenix because of Joe Arpio. One UofA study places that loss at over $500 millions dollars.


When you consider that he handles up to 10,000 prisoners at any one time, that probably equates to several times that over the course of his career, so when you divide the costs among the prisoners it's probably only a few $ a prisoner, and undoubtedly a good percentage probably didn't reoffend, so there's a possibility Arizona probably got good value for him.

I'm pretty convinced that Joe's a frustrated performance artist trying to do Bull Conner.


He should probably think about retiring soon.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,873
14,428
113
Low Earth Orbit
The Cartels run Phoenix. Mexicans by the hundreds with 50lb bales of weed and bales of meth which all gets broken down in Phoenix and Maricopa creates f*cking mayhem.

I'd never want to live in Phoenix.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
The Cartels run Phoenix. Mexicans by the hundreds with 50lb bales of weed and bales of meth which all gets broken down in Phoenix and Maricopa creates f*cking mayhem.

I'd never want to live in Phoenix.


Bullhead City may be a better choice!
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
... and then the suckers complain about tax increases to pay for the fukkin trouble those azzholes cause.


I think perhaps some of the miscreants may be saving the taxpayers some money every day they are in jail. Not sure if it is particularly a Republican thing............maybe more a fact of life! -:)
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,458
9,591
113
Washington DC

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Um. . . your link only shows what percentage of Arizona voters voted for the Republican Presidential candidate in 2012. Which is at best loosely connected to the political demographics of Arizona.

I'm not saying you're wrong, mind. Just that this particular fact don't prove much.


The author of the post I was responding to, to put it kindly exaggerates. I would suggest that "strong" is anything above 75%.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
The author of the post I was responding to, to put it kindly exaggerates. I would suggest that "strong" is anything above 75%.
Actually Democrats call 51% a strong mandate......
,
,
,
,.
.
.
.
.
.
.When their side wins