Death knell for AGW

[petros]

Not really, you're just not paying attention. See the post above. Again, if you are goping to argue that climate change isn't anthropogenic, you have to explain the rather remarkable coincidence of (a) CO2 accelerating at unprecedented levels and (b) increase in CO2 in the atmosphere being on the same order of magnitude of mass of CO2 emitted to the atmosphere.

Compare the CO2 content of the atmosphere o the previous interglacial period and Anthro CO2 loses any ground thought it had.

And we're still 4C short of the last as well.

 

[Zipperfish]

Compare the CO2 content of the atmosphere o the previous interglacial period and Anthro CO2 loses any ground thought it had.

And we're still 4C short of the last as well.

Still missing the point. If the CO2 we are emitting to the atmosphere isn't going ito the atnosphere, then where is it going?

 

[captain morgan]

How do you explain all the CO2 increases preanthro?

Stop confusing the issue please.

This is about how we need a carbon tax to reverse global warming, errr - scratch that - climate change

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

Good argument.

Shows a grasp of logic you'll never have.

 

[EagleSmack]

Death F*ING KNEEL OF GLOBAL WARMING MUTHA F*ERS!

 

[Blackleaf]

How's that polar vortex and record low temperatures getting on in Canada and USA?

Apparently, it's so cold there that even Hell has frozen over.

 

[petros]

Still missing the point. If the CO2 we are emitting to the atmosphere isn't going ito the atnosphere, then where is it going?

Plants. That's why were short on CO2 compared to the last interglacial.

You know you really could look this stuff up on your own.

 

[Walter]

Singer pens a zinger.


Articles: The Inventor of the Global Warming Hockey Stick Doubles Down

 

[petros]

How old is that article?

 

[Walter]

how old is that article?

2014

 

[petros]

Some of his material is 2004

 

[Walter]

Some of his material is 2004

And...

 

[petros]

It's outdated.

 

[Walter]

It's outdated.

What's the update?

 

[petros]

You figure it out.

 

[Walter]

You figure it out.

So the info in the article is as up-to-date as possible, thank-you.

 

[petros]

Not at all. You're welcome.

 

[DaSleeper]

 

[petros]

Oo Ah Oo

 

[Zipperfish]

Plants. That's why were short on CO2 compared to the last interglacial.

You know you really could look this stuff up on your own.

OK, so all the carbon dioxide emitted by humans is going to plants, but all the carbon dioxide "naturally" emitted is acumulating in the atmosphere. How don the planets know the ddifference? Or are all those nasty scinetists lying about teh CO2 concentration in the atmosphere?

I don't know why I bother, petros--let you go a few posts and your own argument falls apart due to internal logical inconcsistency.