Houston Anthropologist Reveals Irrefutable Proof that Recorded History Is Wrong

[Dexter Sinister]

Dex the artifacts are there and the promoted history doesn't hold up.

I don't believe a word of this. Chris Dunn is the guy who claimed Giza was a power plant that worked "by responding harmonically with the seismic energy contained within the Earth....the Great Pyramid became a coupled oscillator and drew energy through it and converted it to electromagnetic energy through the sophisticated use of acoustics and quartz-bearing rock." He suffers badly from confirmation bias and so do you. If you find nonsense like that credible, you'll uncritically accept anything that suits your prejudices and deny or ignore all contrary evidence.

 

[MHz]

Dex I didn't reference any of that, what I did reference is his view as a machinist. The vids have more to do with Brein Forester than Chris Dunn. Turn the sound down to avoid getting tangled up in the (unproven) theories and just look at the video and (you) explain how all the 'construction' could be accomplished with copper chisels. The artifacts need some better explanation than what is currently proposed, such as the weathering on the Sphinx when a geologist with a 17 page resume says it was caused by rain then that view should bot be discarded just because he doesn't have the rest of the story.
In that light, what do you consider to be 'contrary evidence' when the when all theories are based on a hypothetical theory that has no solid proof.

Science shows that North Africa once had rivers flowing all through it yet the 'evidence' always shows that during an ice-age the desert regions always stay desert regions and the green belt that is between the ice and the (current) band of deserts that circle the globe remain just as they are and it is the green belt that disappears when that is false for North Africa so it would also be false for the American South-west and for Mongolia as well, they would be as green as North Africa was at that time.
I don't have a problem thinking the Nile was a larger river back then and today it is a trickle compared to what it was back then, a rise of only 50 ft would have it at the paws of the Sphinx, nor do I have a problem thinking that the weather patterns back when the ice-caps were at their largest that to ocean level was 450 lower than it is today and with all probability that extra moisture would have changed the Dead Sea into a body of water that could host schools of fish. Just because nobody is currently promoting that doesn't mean the theory is 'out to lunch'. History shows that 'Scientists' and 'Academics' are notoriously slow on updating their 'beliefs' so it meshes with newer finds and updated theories based on those new finds.

Using the power plant theory just lets you reject his comments on tool marks and he is an expert on those, more than a little convient for you holding onto what you 'have faith in' as being supportive of what the 'facts' actually are.

 

[spaminator]

Ancient Aliens S05E01 Secrets of the Pyramids HD subtitulos español - YouTube

 

[bill barilko]

What do people not understand about working rock using other rocks?

[youtube]QWSTE6WLB0Y[/youtube]

and Yes I know Obsidian is glass.

 

[MHz]

What do people not understand about working rock using other rocks?

Please stay away from rockets.

 

[Dexter Sinister]

Dex I didn't reference any of that, what I did reference is his view as a machinist.

You did link to videos that reference Chris Dunn and Erich von Daniken as if they had some serious credentials in this area instead of having had their major claims debunked long ago. That's enough for me to dismiss them. I don't have to explain anything, these are the people making the claims, it's up to them to provide evidence sufficient to justify accepting the claims. They haven't, and conventional archeology has better explanations anyway.

If you want to make a change in accepted science, you have to follow science's rules for procedure and evidence and testing, that's the only way we've ever found for discovering the truth content of empirical claims. These guys don't, they don't even know what they are, they just speculate then torque whatever evidence they think they have so it fits, and ignore anything they can't make fit. That's not how to do science, but it's how loons like von Daniken and Graham Hancock and Immanuel Velikovsky think it's done. Those are just three from a long list of names whose appearance in support of any claim, because of their history, justifies dismissal.

 

[MHz]

Way to show that you don't know how to even listen. Go ahead give the rational scientific provable explanation of how the stone work in the 3 pics above was completed.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

Way to show that you don't know how to even listen. Go ahead give the rational scientific provable explanation of how the stone work in the 3 pics above was completed.

OK, I'll play. You say that the stone work was done by an advanced ancient civilisation, and that if we disagree, we must prove you wrong.

I say it was done by Merlin with his magic staff. If you disagree, prove me wrong.

I win.

 

[MHz]

Only in proving what an ******* you are.
Another know-it-all that can't reply to the actual question, so typical of know-it-alls.

 

[Dexter Sinister]

Way to show that you don't know how to even listen. Go ahead give the rational scientific provable explanation of how the stone work in the 3 pics above was completed.

You are so rarely right about anything that I have a rule not to take seriously anything you post. Produce some legitimate and serious scientists talking about this stuff and I'll sit up and take notice. But the junk sources you cite? Nope.

 

[petros]

The power from a pyramid is the show of power of a nation that will work together as a nation or kingdom.

A hemp rope that is woven or a copper disk that is cast with embedded garnets will cut granite in nice smooth, straight cuts.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

Only in proving what an ******* you are.
Another know-it-all that can't reply to the actual question, so typical of know-it-alls.

And you're another gullible von Dainekenist who tries to compensate for his inability to control, or even understand, the world around him by indulging in fantasies about sooper seekrit knowledge that only he and a select few have.

Sad, really.

 

[darkbeaver]

You are so rarely right about anything that I have a rule not to take seriously anything you post. Produce some legitimate and serious scientists talking about this stuff and I'll sit up and take notice. But the junk sources you cite? Nope.

Ah but your reactionary comments on posts that threaten your conventional world view proves that you do indeed take what MHZ says seriously, so don't tell us that you aren't frightened near unto death by what's outside your litter box, cuz you is.

And you're another gullible von Dainekenist who tries to compensate for his inability to control, or even understand, the world around him by indulging in fantasies about sooper seekrit knowledge that only he and a select few have.

Sad, really.

I have a twelve hundred ton stone monolith to move three miles, could you suggest an engineering firm?

 

[Cliffy]

Well, it seems I posted the OP without researching the subject. Turns out it is quite controversial. I don't really care if it is true or not enough to have an opinion on it, but, I do believe there have been advanced civilizations before or during the last ice age. Many underwater (today) city complexes have been found world wide. During the last ice age the ocean levels were about 400 feet lower than they are today and today the vast majority of people live in close proximity to the oceans so it was probably no different then. When the last ice age ended, the oceans rose and most of those ancient civilizations were flooded. I also believe that it was that flooding that gave rise to the myths of a world wide flood.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

Ah but your reactionary comments on posts that threaten your conventional world view proves that you do indeed take what MHZ says seriously, so don't tell us that you aren't frightened near unto death by what's outside your litter box, cuz you is.

I have a twelve hundred ton stone monolith to move three miles, could you suggest an engineering firm?

I understand Sooper Seekrit Ancient Alien Civilisation Transport and Storage, Ltd. does good work at reasonable prices.

 

[karrie]

Irrefutable. Well, it loses all scientific credibility right there.


The fact that it carries on to make assertions about energy fields and power sources harnessed by ancient creations without any explanation, just stating it as some fact we should all know, tips the whole thing over the edge.




It's very interesting if the carbon dating is in fact what these scientists say it is. But, it is highly questionable if their methods can be trusted if articles such as this are representative of their application of the scientific method.

 

[MHz]

Sad, really.

Not as sad as you and Dex stating how wonderful your brains are functioning and when asked for your version of how those rocks in those 3 pictures came to be that way you go into full troll mode. At least your are refraining from mentioning copper chisels which would remove all doubts of how uneducated you really are.

Irrefutable. Well, it loses all scientific credibility right there.

The fact that it carries on to make assertions about energy fields and power sources harnessed by ancient creations without any explanation, just stating it as some fact we should all know, tips the whole thing over the edge.


It's very interesting if the carbon dating is in fact what these scientists say it is. But, it is highly questionable if their methods can be trusted if articles such as this are representative of their application of the scientific method.

You can't carbon date modifications to rocks. Forget the energy fields and look at the pictures and explain how they were made, I never said I agreed with the power plant theory but that is all you 3 are clinging to as your sole argument. That pretty much says you don't have a clue as to how they were built.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

Not as sad as you and Dex stating how wonderful your brains are functioning

Where did I state that? Oh, that's right, I didn't. You're a liar as well as a pathetic little gullible man.

 

[karrie]

You can't carbon date modifications to rocks. Forget the energy fields and look at the pictures and explain how they were made, I never said I agreed with the power plant theory but that is all you 3 are clinging to as your sole argument. That pretty much says you don't have a clue as to how they were built.

I'm not clinging to it, or making any real argument, just saying that they don't sound like scientists based on that article.

 

[SLM]