If rubbing tits against a guy is sexual assault, I've been assaulted more times than I can count.
I didn't post an out for men.
Now for me if she can describe in detail what happened it would be rape. As soon as she starts saying 'I can't remember' the case is over unless there is some proof she was drugged. These lines are obviously mitigated by the defense posted above.
In a legitimate rape case I would like to see him shot and castrated then hung as an example. What I don't agree with is a free pass to women based on gender. They have to be responsible for themselves and their actions, not be allowed to call foul based upon regrets or memory loss that was self-inflicted.
Quite a large difference between calling somebody a misogynist and a sex-offender. I'm sure you small, narrow mind has trouble grasping that but at least try.
It's always entertaining when politically correctness runs completely opposit from our human animal instincts.
It's a perfect recipe for hours of pointless debate.
If you don't have a definitive "let's fu ck", then the answer is no.
It is a grey area and very hard to discern what is what when both parties were so intoxicated nobody has a clear memory. In that situation it is a lesson learned the hard way.There's the "but", all a man has to do is follow your above recipe and he get''s a pass.... or at least should get a pass according to you, because the above is not a "legitimate" rape.
Oh please! If she can't remember what happened how does she know? It might be rape and it might not but she has no evidence either way. The lack of memory by self-induced intoxication is her fault, not his. The message needs to be that it is in your best interest not to willingly get to that state of intoxication.and we already know that you have stated that if the woman/girl is drunk and her memory isn't all that great about what happened then it isn't a "legitimate" rape...right?
If rubbing tits against a guy is sexual assault, I've been assaulted more times than I can count.
The message needs to be that it is in your best interest not to willingly get to that state of intoxication.
why don't you elaborate on that.
LOL – emotions sure are getting wrought up quickly. This really is a no-brainer topic, but emotions are quickly driving some people into making extreme assumptions. If a person is semi-conscious or unconscious at the time somebody has sex with them then yes a presumption of sexual assault would arise. But the mere fact of a one person being as drunk or drunker than another does not make either person a rape victim just for having sex. Did you notice how I used all gender neutral words? When you think of it that way it is obvious. I doubt that very many women would want to be considered “rapists” (the old term) if they do something to a semi-conscious unconsenting partner, but some here are quick to want to do that to men.
mi·sog·y·nist
[mi-soj-uh-nist, mahy‐] Show IPA
noun a person who hates, dislikes,mistrusts,ormistreatswomen.
I'd say your accusation is comparable to mine, especially since I work with the public on a one on one basis every day.
What does that have to do with the issue? What gender are you? The way you want to turn normal men into rapists you are either a male who has surrendered his masculinity or a radical feminist. Which is it, I wonder?
You should be careful about tossing accusations like that about. Even on an internet forum there are still libel and slander laws G.
I'm not assuming anything, just mentioning my experiences but never mentioned the ball grabbing, or sneaking into the bathroom while I was taking a leak.You're assuming women only ever sexually assault men. They assault other women too. It's rare, but it happens.
Humans, what animals.I'm not assuming anything, just mentioning my experiences but never mentioned the ball grabbing, or sneaking into the bathroom while I was taking a leak.
I've seen the women assaulting women and men assaulting men. I'm fortunate enough to spend quite a bit of my social life around gays and lesbians.
Of course, if he can prove it.
in other words, the professed double standard (by others, not you) isn't a double standard.
Ok numbnuts....... if you're going to quote me, then quote me, don't be quoting some shyte that I never wrote and attribute it to me.
as for your above bullshyte, I'm not turning "normal men" into rapists. If they don't have consent for sex, then they ARE rapists. I didn't turn them into rapists, they did that all on their own.
I'm fortunate enough to spend quite a bit of my social life around gays and lesbians.