Wrong. It's the Theory of Evolution. It is not the same Theory of Evolution that Darwin devised.
Actually it is almost identical to what Darwin proposed. I'm sure when your theory of AGW is a few hundred years old with a few hundred years of evidence gathered in the real world application and thousands of more years of evidence in the fossil record it will be generally accepted as proven also.
You keep trying to convince us that a theory is a fact but you can't. Some theories have more evidence, like Darwin,to make them generally accepted as fact while others, like string theory, have absolutely no real world evidence at all. AGW falls a lot closer to string theory at this point in time.
So do you want to quit trying to seem superior while I make you look like a complete idiot yet or do you wish to continue on with your assertion that a theory is a fact when all theories, by definition, are guesses and predictions with different levels of reliable evidence to back them up.