Who is their Jihad against? 'Merica or Israel?
Non believers, infidels.. and they want an Islamic Empire around the world...
The Muslim Brotherhood also spun off/started several other groups like Hamas, Hazbollah, Al Queda.
Who is their Jihad against? 'Merica or Israel?
That is what this could turn into unless they send in Riddic kulous.... fvcking censor.
The Saudis aren't doing so good ether. Good thing this sick joke on Americans raised the price of oil $15 a barrel. Now it'll be ever harder for the economy to recover.
Not quite, and I quoth the T-Bone:
But that is a no-win situation. Even if the strikes were hugely successful the world is full of bloggers and politicians that will paint a different picture. That is not in the interest of any American.T-Bone was saying what I'm saying. The President can order a military attack without the authorization or vote from congress.
Eagle is right he does not need Congress to strike. He give the appearance of showing
them respect. In fact its put up or shut up time and he has outplayed the crazies both
in the Republican Party and the Democrats. If they vote No its their fault if the outcome
is bad. If they vote Yes and it goes bad they can't blame him because they voted for it.
For once he has trapped the radical Republican element with their own words.
For some time a bunch of Republicans were chiming he had to go through them which
he doesn't..
T-Bone was saying what I'm saying. The President can order a military attack without the authorization or vote from congress.
But that is a no-win situation. Even if the strikes were hugely successful the world is full of bloggers and politicians that will paint a different picture. That is not in the interest of any American.
You didn't read what he wrote. Or, More likely, you did but couldn't comprehend it..:smile:
Or....
Someone is definitely asleep at the switch, gas prices haven't budged here in over a week!
If they vote no that will create an even more interesting political situation. And I don't think BO will look all that bad in the end. When all the bluster starts in the 2016 Pres race there will be lots to feed on. Can't say the no-vote will look like a future Commander-In-Chief.Keep spinning DG. Obama wanted to strike Syria and caved in and was pressured to go to congress. If they vote no the President has been defeated and Al Queda doesn't get US Navy air and cruise missile support. Obama trapped himself.
Correct! The Supreme Court may someday hold that the President may not take non-emergency military action without Congressional consent, but that day has not arrived (and is not likely to, given the Supremes' avoidance of the issue in the past).T-Bone was saying what I'm saying. The President can order a military attack without the authorization or vote from congress.
Correct! The Supreme Court may someday hold that the President may not take non-emergency military action without Congressional consent, but that day has not arrived (and is not likely to, given the Supremes' avoidance of the issue in the past).
You didn't read what he wrote. Or, More likely, you did but couldn't comprehend it..:smile:
Or....
If they vote no that will create an even more interesting political situation. And I don't think BO will look all that bad in the end. When all the bluster starts in the 2016 Pres race there will be lots to feed on. Can't say the no-vote will look like a future Commander-In-Chief.
Thank you!
Are we clear now Hunboldt? Are we clear!
![]()
To his base Obama will never look bad. But he will have lost. The Administration has stated they want to punish Syria with some sort of strike and Congress will most likely vote against it. Obama either bows to Congressional will or does it anyways.