That is how the law is in Canada. They have a proximity of age clause. Also until the current government took power 14 was the age of consent in Canada. Which does cause one to wonder how set in stone laws really are.
Lesbian high school cheerleader...
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
That is how the law is in Canada. They have a proximity of age clause. Also until the current government took power 14 was the age of consent in Canada. Which does cause one to wonder how set in stone laws really are.
I heard about a case in the states where the parents pretended they didn't care, and just bided their time until the older one hit 18.
Yeah, it was a two-year age-of-proximity principal, and it seemed to work okay.
I never heard about Herpies changing that. What is it now?
It would help if we could get some feedback from the youngster of the pair.
It reminds me of a case in Montana, where a woman in her 20's started doing it with a 14 year old male. They went at it for a couple of years, until his parents found out, when he was 16. They pressed charges, and she got tossed in the slammer, and the kid still visits her.
Hubby and I started dating when I was 14, and he was 17 going on 18. At the time, it was legal. Some lawmakers arbitrarily changed it.
I have a hard time with the courts going tooth and nail after any consensual relationships over 13 years old, where they involve other teenagers. I think the sex offender status being applied to people and haunting their lives is not appropriate in those instances, especially where the courts have found that jail time isn't even appropriate.
I have a hard time with the courts going tooth and nail after any consensual relationships over 13 years old, where they involve other teenagers. I think the sex offender status being applied to people and haunting their lives is not appropriate in those instances, especially where the courts have found that jail time isn't even appropriate.
Actually, dating at 14 is OK, even in Florida. It's the horizontal mambo that'll get you in trouble.
Reminds me of a joke:
A deputy sheriff is on the night shift, and he decides to drive out to the local Lovers' Lane to see if all's well. Sure enough, there's a car parked there. The deputy takes his flashlight and approaches the car, where he sees a young man in the driver's seat reading a magazine, and a young woman in the back seat knitting. Perplexed (big surprise there), the deputy knocks on the driver's window. The young man winds the window down.
"What are you doing?" asks the deputy.
"Reading a magazine" answers the young man, in the voice one uses for addressing stupid children and Members of Parliament.
Irritated, the cop asks "And what's she doing?"
The young man turns his head to look, then says in the same voice "Knitting. A sweater, I belive."
Angry now, the cop decides to get aggressive (again, big surprise). "All right, smartass, how old are you?"
"Nineteen" replies the young man.
"Oh, yeah? And how old is she?"
"Well," the young man says, and looks at his watch, "In seven minutes, she'll be eighteen."
I think if one of them is underage and the other is barely past 18, then it should be a "panel" of parents who know the kids to decide how to handle it. Being parents, they'll know more than any judge whether or not the kids' motivations are innocent, sinister, or otherwise. If the decision is they should be separated, then so be it. If the decision is they are behaving according to normal human desires, then so be it, just don't sneak around.
But an anonymous judge in a clogged court system that's supposed to be handling murderers and Wall Street financial terrorists? No.
Even if they should be separated (and I'm not contesting that, the fourteen year old's parents want it ended, it should be ended, end of story), there's a difference between making them stop dating, and registering one of them as a sex offender.
Hmm...I wasn't aware of the issue of registering them as sex offenders. Given the situation, I think that's being too Nazi.
Last edited:
Yes, LG. homosexuality is gravely disordered and a mortal sin.
Romans 1 is the most literal condemnation.. but the entire Biblical evocation of morality, responsibility, family and natural law condemns it.. from Sodom forward. There are no such things as 'natural' or 'genetic' homosexuals.. there are just people who have abandoned natural law and God.. for the transient gratifications of homosexuality.. and escape from moral reality.. a fall into material debasement.
Even so our society discriminates between that which is sinful and that which is illegal. Sin is largely centred on the destruction of one's own soul... illegality usually involves wanton disregard for the welfare, property and dignity of others. In this case, Kaitlyn.. the cheerleader.. was involved with predatory opportunism in stealing the innocence of a 14 year old girl for her own sexual gratification.. likely causing her serious psychological confusion and distress.
That's a serious crime.. one for which men who have victimized young girls have spent years in prison.. and she's being offered what amounts to a conditional discharge... without penalty. That is not equal justice before the law.
Last edited:
*Sigh* :roll: ... Has anyone asked the youngster how she feels about it?
Or is your position going to be that, if she says she like it, that's proof of "confusion"?
I'm curious which cases you're referring to regarding males spending serious time in prison for dating classmates.
I've read a lot of cases of teenage boys getting sex offender classifications for consensual dating relationships with classmates, but no serious jail time. I think it's a disservice to society that we force these teens to attend school together, and expect them to not form connections, based on arbitrary laws regarding their ages.
She was probably quite happy until the a-holes came crawling out from under their rocks.
As an aside to this story.. New Jersey Governor Chris Christie (a Republican).. signed a bill making it illegal to provide counselling for young people struggling with homosexuality. It's part of the same syndrome we are seeing of a complete trivialization and affirmation of homosexuality.. which is bound ulitmately to be imposed on churches.
It's been a steady march towards imposing homosexual legitimization on courts, institutions, laws for 30 years.. and it will inevitably be imposed on religions. That shows the true character of the homosexual movement.. whose goal is tyranny under a cult of evil.. not equality.
It's been a steady march towards imposing homosexual legitimization on courts, institutions, laws for 30 years.. and it will inevitably be imposed on religions. That shows the true character of the homosexual movement.. whose goal is tyranny under a cult of evil.. not equality.
Last edited: