Hi Tonington,
The link you have provided is a actually a letter to the editor in which a few doctors refer to some research they had done (some 25 years ago)
the doctors are - below....
Can you count? 1990-1998. Not that it matters. Do you think it's only newly marketed drugs that matter for your conclusion?
Dr. Ken Tardiff, a Cornell reseacher, "maintains a private practice in General Adult Psychiatry and provides Pharmacotherapy and Psychotherapy as well as special consultations and opinions in legal aspects of psychiatry."Dr Ken Tardiff
Dr Peter Marzuk (vice chair of AFSP)
Dr Andrew Leon (scientific council for AFSP)
Dr. Peter Marzuk, "Associate Dean (Curricular Affairs), Professor of Psychiatry, and Attending Psychiatrist at the Weill Cornell Medical College and New York-Presbyterian Hospital."
Dr. Andrew Leon, a former Cornell biostatistician, now deceased.
Such as? Anything besides ad hominems?Here are some HUGE problems with their data...
Nope. They don't show up on the staff directory for the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention.First and foremost - these doctors are part of American Foundation for Suicide Prevention which is a non for profit org ..
So? The pharmaceutical company I work for sells Malaria medication to countries in Africa at cost, no profit. Do you think that means the drugs don't work, and don't save lives? If we pay for research on plasmodium evolution, is that suspect too?If you download AFSP's annual return (from their website) you will see where their money comes from..their huge sponsers are (who pays them) which are pharmaceutical companies...
Don't get me wrong, there have been many decisions made by drug companies that have caused great harm. That doesn't mean everything they do is bad. Small pox doesn't exist because of vaccinations. Polio is getting close to being eradicated. Most people would consider this a good thing.
In other words the pay was coming from the pharma companies..
You have no evidence that the research I posted was paid for by pharmaceuticals. The annual report also lists non-commercial sources of funding for the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention. In fact, for the latest fiscal year report available (2011), the majority of their income (A little over $7 million out of $9.6 million) comes from Out of the Darkness events. Walks where volunteers raise money.of course the outcome was going to be a plus for the pharmas...
So in fact, you have nothing to say about problems with the data, and your facts aren't even in order. It's either irrelevant as in the case of where some non-profits funds come from, or in the case of the researchers affiliations, it's not even true.
Maybe your time would be better spent raising money for campaigns like the Out of Darkness walks, to help prevent suicides. Just a thought.