Sophisticated Negroes

[Cliffy]

Uppidy nigras is gonna be de downfall of 'merica. Dey scare de bejeeezus out o dem crackers cuz deys smarta dan dem dam crackers.

Ah, whitey, your karma has caught up to you.

 

[PoliticalNick]

Is your mommy helping correct your mistakes?

You're right, you can't spell. Which makes it all the more hilarious seeing you call Americans dumb. Our first graders here can spell better than you.

I wouldn't count on that....I wouldn't count that your graduates can spell either.

Speak for yourself moron.

Come on, you can do it. One more for you to correct slow one.

Now while I am not a big fan of the way Angstrom seems to bash the US without any cognitive reason he has clearly stated on here more than once he is dyslexic so making fun of his spelling mistakes is really quite a low thing to do. Maybe you didn't know but now you do so maybe you will conduct yourself accordingly in the future.

 

[JLM]

You would think one would want to at least know how to spell before calling someone else retarded and stupid you dumb a**.

Hey, there are a lot of stupid bastards out there who CAN spell!l-

 

[Johnnny]

my grandma still calls black people negroes.... Does that make her racist? Shes a very nice lady and makes lethal finnish pancakes :lol:....

 

[JLM]

my grandma still calls black people negroes.... Does that make her racist? Shes a very nice lady and makes lethal finnish pancakes :lol:....

Many people get hung up on semantics....................is calling a black person any form of the "N" word any worse than say calling an Irishman a "mick"?

 

[Locutus]

That there is such partisan race-baiting and bashing at all within segments of the black community is very sad.

 

[JLM]

That there is such partisan race-baiting and bashing at all within segments of the black community is very sad.

Any sadder than the Oriental community, the Jewish community, the Scandinavian community? Very few people take offense at a "nickname" for a person.........................why with a group of people?

 

[Spade]

It is the way it is used that is particularly offensive.

 

[L Gilbert]

Meh. Most people, regardless of "race", would sooner choose a side and start bashing rather than get together for a chat and figure out how to get along and move forward; after all, it is the way that takes less effort. Don't have to think as much.

 

[TeddyBallgame]

8O Wanna see aloof, check out Romney, who doesn't have too much in common with poor folks cause "they have a safety net"

****ing cons.:shaking2:

- Nutbar Nuggler ... The column locutus referenced concerned Obama's well known (read Bob Woodward''s latest book or numerous other exposes of Obama's first term) tendency to be aloof from - ignoring at worst and being condescending and arrogant with at best - the people elected to represent their constituents in congress. Consequently, Obama has proven absolutely hopeless at making any deals across the aisle, not even able to get a budget passed in four years and not able to come close to keeping any of his promises (e.g. immigration reform in his first term) that require at least some bipartisan compromises and support.

- Romney, on the other hand, was the most effective chief executive of any government in the US during his four years as governor of Massachusetts. He took over a state that had severe economic and financial problems and that had a leglisature that was 87% Democrat. So he spent much of his time shmoozing and deal making with the Democratic legislators, meeting at least once a week (every Monday morning) with the leaders from both parties to discuss priorites, policies and problems, and managing to accomplish things such as health care reform, tax and debt reductions, etc. that had been considered impossible to achieve by a Republican governor facing a Democratic legislature. Unlike your hero who had zero executive experience, Romney, you see, was a brilliant and accomplished executive who knew what it took to get things done through other people which starts with being approachable to other people. How Mitt would have salivated and what he would have been able to accomplish had he a Democratic majority in congress his first two years as Obama did.

- Obama is simply an arrogant and aloof fellow who gets a rush from campaiging before thousands but is bored and impatient with the personal contact with legislators that the US system requires. If anything, Romney is the opposite. So Obama has some traits that make for good campaigning and bad government while Romney has some traits that make for bad campaigning and good government. Pity for both and mostly a pity for the US.

- Please don't reply with your usual idiotic and annoying "f&cking conservatives" crap. I didn't write this for you because you are too stupid and too left wing to either understand or to learn anything from this. I wrote it for the handful of folks here who are genuinely interested in US political leaders and government and what makes things work and not work in the US political system.

 

[#juan]

- Nutbar Nuggler ... The column locutus referenced concerned Obama's well known (read Bob Woodward''s latest book or numerous other exposes of Obama's first term) tendency to be aloof from - ignoring at worst and being condescending and arrogant with at best - the people elected to represent their constituents in congress. Consequently, Obama has proven absolutely hopeless at making any deals across the aisle, not even able to get a budget passed in four years and not able to come close to keeping any of his promises (e.g. immigration reform in his first term) that require at least some bipartisan compromises and support.

- Romney, on the other hand, was the most effective chief executive of any government in the US during his four years as governor of Massachusetts. He took over a state that had severe economic and financial problems and that had a leglisature that was 87% Democrat. So he spent much of his time shmoozing and deal making with the Democratic legislators, meeting at least once a week (every Monday morning) with the leaders from both parties to discuss priorites, policies and problems, and managing to accomplish things such as health care reform, tax and debt reductions, etc. that had been considered impossible to achieve by a Republican governor facing a Democratic legislature. Unlike your hero who had zero executive experience, Romney, you see, was a brilliant and accomplished executive who knew what it took to get things done through other people which starts with being approachable to other people. How Mitt would have salivated and what he would have been able to accomplish had he a Democratic majority in congress his first two years as Obama did.

- Obama is simply an arrogant and aloof fellow who gets a rush from campaiging before thousands but is bored and impatient with the personal contact with legislators that the US system requires. If anything, Romney is the opposite. So Obama has some traits that make for good campaigning and bad government while Romney has some traits that make for bad campaigning and good government. Pity for both and mostly a pity for the US.

- Please don't reply with your usual idiotic and annoying "f&cking conservatives" crap. I didn't write this for you because you are too stupid and too left wing to either understand or to learn anything from this. I wrote it for the handful of folks here who are genuinely interested in US political leaders and government and what makes things work and not work in the US political system.

Teddy you don't know what you are talking about. Nuggler is one of our revered veterans who never need to apologise
to the likes of you. You've been fighting a "long over" election since you arrived here. The election is over. Find something else to
rant about......better yet......find somewhere else to do it....

 

[Spade]

Teddy you don't know what you are talking about. Nuggler is one of our revered veterans who never need to apologise
to the likes of you. You've been fighting a "long over" election since you arrived here. The election is over. Find something else to
rant about......better yet......find somewhere else to do it....

Well said!

 

[JLM]

Well said!

To tell you the truth if the mods have been paying attention and read the last paragraph in his latest post I don't see how they can do anything BUT "DEEP SIX" him. (But I suppose there's at least one other poster who gets away with the same sh*t) -

Please don't reply with your usual idiotic and annoying "f&cking conservatives" crap. I didn't write this for you because you are too stupid and too left wing to either understand or to learn anything from this.[/B] I wrote it for the handful of folks here who are genuinely interested in US political leaders and government and what makes things work and not work in the US political system.

I'm ratting you out to the mods. Have a lovely day!

Thanks for the "Red", Teddy boy- shows you are paying attention!

 

[Locutus]

To tell you the truth if the mods have been paying attention and read the last paragraph in his latest post I don't see how they can do anything BUT "DEEP SIX" him. (But I suppose there's at least one other poster who gets away with the same sh*t) -



I'm ratting you out to the mods. Have a lovely day!

Thanks for the "Red", Teddy boy- shows you are paying attention!

To tell you the truth, it doesn't bother me at all.

I'm not Teddy's pal, babysitter or FB friend. Most member here make snide remarks to others (veiled or direct) they see as their adversaries, nemeses or trolls. I subscribe to latitude and the hot kitchen principle. Not to mention the ignore feature.

Carry on.

 

[JLM]

To tell you the truth, it doesn't bother me at all.

I'm not Teddy's pal, babysitter or FB friend. Most member here make snide remarks to others (veiled or direct) they see as their adversaries, nemeses or trolls. I subscribe to latitude and the hot kitchen principle. Not to mention the ignore feature.

Carry on.

So why make "rules" that aren't enforced? -

 

[Locutus]

Our discretion.

 

[DaSleeper]

Or a matter of frequency;-)

 

[JLM]

Or a matter of frequency;-)

I wouldn't think lack of frequency would disqualify Teddy Boy! -

 

[TeddyBallgame]

- JLM ... Let me try to explain what locutus understandably can't say even though I suspect he would dearly like to. You are a mentallly deficient A-hole who had some meaningless public sector union job and retired in your early 50s on a f$cking pension worth over 3x what the less than 50% in the private sector who have any company subsidized pension plan at all are able to score. You contibute nothing whatsoever by way of original content to this board and your only contribution is to chime in with the usual left wing big government BS and attacks on me and anyone else who posts here from a conservative perspective. Locutus thinks you are a f$cking goodball with your claims that the public sector uniosn pension swindles Greek-style are in reality a rip off of the unionized pensioners and that you are a hypocrite or a fool when you claim to be politically independent. But he realizes that on boards like this quantity counts for at least as much as quality. So he puts up with your silly s$it. But don't expect him to be stupid enough to acquiesce in your desire to get rid of one of the few posters here who actually posts original and accurate and informative material.

 

[JLM]

- JLM ... Let me try to explain what locutus understandably can't say even though I suspect he would dearly like to. You are a mentallly deficient A-hole who had some meaningless public sector union job and retired in your early 50s on a f$cking pension worth over 3x what the less than 50% in the private sector who have any company subsidized pension plan at all are able to score. You contibute nothing whatsoever by way of original content to this board and your only contribution is to chime in with the usual left wing big government BS and attacks on me and anyone else who posts here from a conservative perspective. Locutus thinks you are a f$cking goodball with your claims that the public sector uniosn pension swindles Greek-style are in reality a rip off of the unionized pensioners and that you are a hypocrite or a fool when you claim to be politically independent. But he realizes that on boards like this quantity counts for at least as much as quality. So he puts up with your silly s$it. But don't expect him to be stupid enough to acquiesce in your desire to get rid of one of the few posters here who actually posts original and accurate and informative material.

Personally I doubt if either you or Locutus (who should have the ability and gumption to speak for himself) know sheep sh*t from dates! But you are both entitled to your opinions regardless of how feeble minded they are, as is evidenced by your blatherings about the public service! Whatever its faults are I performed a job someone had to do so maybe you should just kindly F**K OFF!