For God to condemn you justto die for you is ridiculous and immoral.
In doing so, God would beendorsing human sacrifice and the notion that punishing the innocent instead ofthe guilty is good justice. He would also be condoning suicide.
Ezekiel 18:20 The soul thatsinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father,neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of therighteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be uponhim.
Psalm 49:7 None of them canby any means redeem his brother, nor give to God a ransom for him:
Substitutionary atonement isimmoral according to scriptures and all other holy books that I know of. Ithink that the guilty should be punished and not an innocent human or even aman being ridden like a mule, ---- to use common jargon, --- by a God/Jesus.This is likely the moral reason why most Jews do not accept Jesus as themessiah along with the fact that Jesus did not fulfill the other Jewishrequirements set by their books and myths.
People are supposed to martyrthemselves for their God, not their God martyr himself for them.
Do you agree that for God tocondemn you just to die for you is ridiculous and immoral?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqP_fjBkwxc&feature=related
If you believe thatsubstitutionary atonement is moral, please provide an argument to support yourposition.
===============================================
There are also ample quotesin scripture that speak against God wanting any sacrifice at all and if youembrace the notion of innocent blood atonement and God setting Jesus as theransom for sins, then please view these for the real biblical perspective.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YoHP-f-_F9U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ott15j2KwQ&feature=related
Regards
DL