Extreme heat, drought have ‘virtually no explanation other than climate change’

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Extreme heat, drought have ‘virtually no explanation other than climate change,’ new study says

WASHINGTON—Extremely hot and long summers and weather-related catastrophes — such as wildfire and drought — are poised to be the norm, and they are driven by climate change, according to a new research paper published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In an opinion piece over the weekend in the Washington Post that previewed the findings, the paper’s lead author, James E. Hansen wrote: “It is no longer enough to say that global warming will increase the likelihood of extreme weather and to repeat the caveat that no individual weather event can be directly linked to climate change.

“To the contrary, our analysis shows that, for the extreme hot weather of the recent past, there is virtually no explanation other than climate change.”

Hansen, the longtime director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, was among the first scientists to warn about climate change and its potential effects at a 1988 Senate hearing.

He now says, however, he was mistaken in one critical way: “I was too optimistic” — namely, the effects of climate change are being felt now, not in a distant future.

“The deadly European heat wave of 2003, the fiery Russian heat wave of 2010 and catastrophic droughts in Texas and Oklahoma last year can each be attributed to climate change,” he wrote in the Washington Post piece. “And once the data are gathered in a few weeks’ time, it’s likely that the same will be true for the extremely hot summer the United States is suffering through right now.”

Hansen, along with co-authors Makiko Sato and Reto Ruedy, looked at the period from 1951-1980 as the “base period” with which to compare more recent seasonal temperatures and variability of temperatures, over summer and winter.

The 29-year base period was one of relatively stable global temperatures, the paper notes, and recent enough that many people, especially baby boomers, would likely remember it.

The researchers showed the chances of temperatures spiking past their normal variability — what are called “outliers” in statistics — are much greater now than during the base period.

“They found that prior to the onset of human-caused global warming, there were very few of these (anomalous) events,” said John Abraham, professor of thermal sciences at the University of St. Thomas and co-founder of the Climate Science Rapid Response Team, an information clearing house.

“However, with each decade, the number of these very rare events has increased significantly. Not only have the average temperatures increased around the world but so too has the variability.”

Hansen and his team also showed that while all extreme “hot events” have increased globally, “the occurrence of cold events has virtually disappeared,” Abraham wrote.

Many scientists are researching the link between climate and weather, including Kevin Trenberth, distinguished senior scientist in the climate analysis section at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. Trenberth is looking into climate change’s day-to-day effect on weather.

Trenberth said that while other scientists had already covered much of the ground that Hansen and his colleagues did, the new paper highlights that summer time is when we can expect more anomalies to occur.

“ ‘Climate dice,’ describing the chance of unusually warm or cool seasons, have become more and more ‘loaded’ in the past 30 years, coincident with rapid global warming,” Hansen and his colleagues write.

“An important change is the emergence of a category of summertime extremely hot outliers. This hot extreme, which covered much less than 1 per cent of Earth’s surface during the base period, now typically covers about 10 per cent of the land area.”

All this, without the data for 2012 in the mix.

The team’s findings provoked an immediate split among some scientific colleagues. Some experts said he had come up with a smart new way of understanding the magnitude of the heat extremes that people around the world are noticing. But others suggested that he had presented a weak statistical case for his boldest claims and that the rest of the paper contained little that had not been observed in the scientific literature for years.

Extreme heat, drought have virtually no other explanation
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
NOW weather is an indicator for GW because it's hot out.

What will they say come winter?
 

skookumchuck

Council Member
Jan 19, 2012
2,467
0
36
Van Isle
Lets tell all these climate change peeps that we are taking away their grant money because it is needed to help us adapt. Plus the money saved in electrical energy and paper would be helpful as well.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,506
14,319
113
Low Earth Orbit
Last summer I stated this summer's drought and heat will be blamed on GW.

Boy o boy did I ever ****ing nail that one.
 

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,127
8,145
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca
How to Parse Climate Change and Extreme Weather?



James E. Hansen, the irrepressible NASA scientist who was among the first to sound the alarm about human-caused global warming, has roiled the scientific community again with a new scientific paper explicitly linking high concentrations of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases to recent severe heat waves and drought.

My colleague Justin Gillis has a detailed article in Tuesday’s Times on the study and the initial reaction to it.

In the paper, published in the prestigious Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Dr. Hansen and two co-authors say that human activities – chiefly the burning of fossil fuels – have “loaded the dice,” making extreme weather events more frequent. They go further and say that the drought in the United States and the deadly heat wave in Russia, among other recent weather extremes, were direct consequences of this phenomenon.

While the vast majority of climatologists believe that higher concentrations of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases make harsh weather more likely, most have so far been reluctant to attribute specific weather events to higher greenhouse gas levels.

This is a question that has vexed scientists and perplexed the public for years. Was global warming responsible for Hurricane Katrina and other powerful storms? Has the burning of coal and oil caused the historic heat waves that large parts of the United States are now suffering? How much of the weird weather so much of the world is now experiencing can be attributed to global warming, and how much to the natural variability of climate?

These are questions that have not only scientific implications but political consequences as well. If one believes – as President Obama does – that human activities are contributing to climate change, then it follows that people have an obligation to take steps to slow emissions and mitigate the impact. If one believes – as Mitt Romney now appears to – that recent weather phenomena are merely cyclical events, then an aggressive government response seems like a costly and ineffective solution.

These are core political questions that the candidates and the electorate will face this fall, even though so far we have not yet heard a vigorous public debate on them. The Times hopes to kick-start that discussion through its Agenda project.

Here and here are links to more detail from the Hansen study, with some fascinating visualizations of the spreading heat.

source: How to Parse Climate Change and Extreme Weather? - NYTimes.com
 

beaker

Electoral Member
Jun 11, 2012
508
0
16
thepeacecountry
Re: Extreme heat, drought have ‘virtually no explanation other than climate change’

NOW weather is an indicator for GW because it's hot out.

What will they say come winter?


I notice the report is the latest to make note of the fact that heat spikes have become more numerous, while cold spikes have almost disappeared. I expect the researchers will say the same in the wintertime.
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
Last summer I stated this summer's drought and heat will be blamed on GW.

Boy o boy did I ever ****ing nail that one.

Which, of course, doesn't mean it's not.
Doesn't mean that it is, either.

Just that you made an obvious prediction, and you're pleased that you were right.
 

beaker

Electoral Member
Jun 11, 2012
508
0
16
thepeacecountry
Re: Extreme heat, drought have ‘virtually no explanation other than climate change’

Is it a truthful report or just a report?

Well given that other reports are saying the same thing and the deniers seem unable to come up with any facts to back up a different view I guess we can accept it as truthful.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,506
14,319
113
Low Earth Orbit
Just that you made an obvious prediction, and you're pleased that you were right.
Was it a tough prediction to make? What did I base it on?

Well given that other reports are saying the same thing and the deniers seem unable to come up with any facts to back up a different view I guess we can accept it as truthful.
So the Pacific off the coast of Baja is back to normal and not overly cool? How does that piece of the Pacific influence Nor Am weather?
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
Was it a tough prediction to make? What did I base it on?

Based on what you just wrote, you predicted that the drought would be blamed on GW. You didn't claim to predict a drought, only that it would be blamed on GW. That's not a hard prediction to make.
 

beaker

Electoral Member
Jun 11, 2012
508
0
16
thepeacecountry
Re: Extreme heat, drought have ‘virtually no explanation other than climate change’

So the Pacific off the coast of Baja is back to normal and not overly cool? How does that piece of the Pacific influence Nor Am weather?


Your question is irrelevant unless you understand why it is cool, Do you?
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,506
14,319
113
Low Earth Orbit
I do. Fully.

Has it returned to normal or is it still cool and parching Nor Am? Yes or no?

What the **** is this all about?

 

Cabbagesandking

Council Member
Apr 24, 2012
1,041
0
36
Ontario
I don't understand your obsession with the Baj, petros. It is, perhaps, one tenth of one percent of the ocean area and it has little effect on anything. Its own problems and temperature shifts are caused by currents that are thousand of miles in extent and systems that sweep across a pretty big ocean.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,506
14,319
113
Low Earth Orbit
That is the piece of ocean that drives Nor Am weather and precipitation.. Would you like to know more so you CAN understand?
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
We had bad thunderstorms over the big slo-pitch tourney this weekend. One loud thunderclap startled me and when I looked up I tripped over a tree root and twisted my ankle. I am now going to write a report that GW is causing injuries around the planet. Never mind thunderstorms are normal in Edson at this time of year or that I wasn't watching where I was stepping...It's all GW's fault. :roll:
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,506
14,319
113
Low Earth Orbit
My weather is driven by the Atlantic Ocean currents and developments. I'm pretty sure I'm in North America.
Can they be displaced by an intense persistent high pressure system on the continent?

P.S. it's cooler than normal off of your coast too.
 
Last edited: