Lawyer Conspiracy To Start Killing BC Hospital Patients!
- Thread starter wizard
- Start date
... only a fool would try to deny that the british columbia civil liberties association isn't a lawyer-run group whose sole purpose is to further the interests of the bar ...
... this is the biography of rob holmes, PRESIDENT of the british columbia civil liberties association:
Rob Holmes is a lawyer practicing trial and appellate civil and commercial litigation and arbitration with Holmes & King in Vancouver, B.C. He did undergraduate studies at U.B.C. (B.A. Poli. Sci 1978; LL.B. 1981), clerked for the B.C. Court of Appeal, was called to the Bar in B.C. in 1983 and thereafter did graduate studies in law at Yale (LL.M., 1984). He has taught as an Adjunct Professor at U.B.C. Law School and has written and delivered many papers and presentations on a variety of legal topics. He is active in the Canadian Bar Association and the Trial Lawyer’s Association of B.C. In 1981 Rob wrote a position paper for the BCCLA on administrative agency investigation powers. Rob was counsel for the BCCLA in the 1980’s in the Dixon v. AGBC litigation in which the provincial electoral boundaries laws were held to be an unconstitutional violation of Charter voting rights and in 1992 in the Carter v. AG Saskatchewan reference to the Supreme Court of Canada concerning Saskatchewan’s electoral boundaries. He was also a director and secretary of the BCCLA in the 1980’s.
... and this is the biography of lindsay m. lyster, VICE PRESIDENT of the british columbia civil liberties association:
Lindsay M. Lyster is a partner in the Vancouver law firm of Moore Edgar Lyster. She served as a member of the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal between 2002 and 2010, where she adjudicated and mediated human rights disputes. She was the Policy Director of the BCCLA before joining the Tribunal. Before that, Lindsay practiced labour, employment and public law with a major national law firm for seven years, appearing before all levels of courts and tribunals. Lindsay’s legal practice includes acting for employees and trade unions in labour, employment and human rights matters. She also conducts third party investigations and mediations. Lindsay has a particular interest in administrative and constitutional law, having appeared before the Supreme Court of Canada in leading human rights and Charter cases. She has taught Administrative Law, Federalism, Charter Litigation, and Human Rights in the Workplace at UBC Law School. Lindsay graduated from UBC Law School in 1991 as the gold medalist, following which she clerked for Madam Justice McLachlin at the Supreme Court of Canada, before being called to the bar in 1993. Lindsay is a frequent lecturer in labour, human rights, employment and administrative law. She is on the Executive of the Administrative Law and Human Rights Sections of the CBA – BC Branch.
... these two aren't just lawyers, these two are UBER-lawyers. they don't represent the bc civil liberties association, they represent the bar ...
... clearly the bc civil liberties assocation is a lawyer-operated organization with an agenda to advance the interests of the bar. and reading the bios, do these two people look like they should have any say in health policy in canada? absolutely not ...
Last edited:
... there are simply too many lawyers -- WAY too many -- involved in this court case ...
... and have you noticed how the news media has covered up for the bar? the news media has essentially placed all of the responsibility for the petition on one person -- gloria taylor. yet she's actually the last of a long list of parties that brought the case to court ...
... for instance, just how many people does the british columbia civil liberties association represent? probably a veritible army of lawyers ...
... and have you noticed how the news media has covered up for the bar? the news media has essentially placed all of the responsibility for the petition on one person -- gloria taylor. yet she's actually the last of a long list of parties that brought the case to court ...
... for instance, just how many people does the british columbia civil liberties association represent? probably a veritible army of lawyers ...
... where is the money coming from? from the bank account of the person who died in the hospital ...
... the bc supreme court seems to think that when someone dies that gives it instant access to the deceased person's assets. it doesn't and that's the problem with letting lawyers change laws like this ...
I see where you're going with this.
The number of representatives...
divided by the population....
carry the one....
but in the end they're still lawyers. And thus will end the argument. Lol.
Well, that would be how many people the BC Civil Liberties Association would represent.
That claim is fallacious at best.
If there isn't a recognized will in place. As in most provinces.
Actually, they do if you don't write a legal will - and always have, no matter where the death occurred
... you believe the bc civil liberties association represents everyone in british columbia, including children and people that don't even know it exists? wow ...
You don't understand what the BC Civil Liberties Association is, but you chastise it erroneously? Not wow, I'm not surprised at all.
Yes, that's what it's all about. It even represents people who try to steal their father's estate.
Oh that's right, damn! Because of the lawyers. Got it, got it.
Sorry my rationality causes confusion at times.
... and that's another incentive for the bc supreme court to make it easy for the government to kill patients in bc hospitals: easy access to the assets of dead patients who don't have wills ...
... accordingly, you might want to avoid being treated in a bc hospital if you're wealthy and don't have a will -- the bankrupt bc government might decide to bump you off for your assets. and the bc supreme court has made it much easier for them to do just that ...
... also, the bc government CAN seize your assets immediately after you die in a bc hospital even if you DO have a will. the illegal $436,615.00 payment at this link HERE was rendered just four days after my dad died in st. paul's hospital in vancouver. however, my dad DID have a legal will at the time and the payment was remitted COMPLETELY CONTRARY to the instructions in his will ...
... that's the problem with the bar in canada -- they WILL try crazy illegal moves like this but unfortunately the government sees lawyers as these sacred cows who cannot be challenged on their criminal activity ...
You do realize that what you're posting, outside an affidavit, is tantamount to libel and slander, of an identifiable entity, right?