You can believe that if you wish, but as someone who is heavily involved in girls' hockey for the last 7 years, and someone who laughs at the Sedin's nickname as sisters, I would disagree with your attempt to portray it this way.
You apparently don't know much about girls hockey. I suggest you stick to two things you do well: making excuses for the Canucks in general, and the Sedins in particular, and whining about how Boston is able to play NHL style hockey.
Carry on, your trusty assistant will be here to defend you shortly.
my husband and I started and ran a girls athletic club, hockey and fastball for years, he coached both,
I managed and helped coach, and we ran the organization, went to b.c. championships, canadian championships,
and developed girls in both of these to the highest level possible, and also ran a house league at the
same time.
We had four daughters, all of whom reached a very high level in many sports, we have plaques, ribbons
and great memories for all of those years, and feel so happy that we opened the door for so many young
girls, aged from about 8 up to 17, we watched them grow up before our eyes, and become good human beings, and
much of that was helped along from their participation in the sports.
Our girls hockey teams, up to the age of 13 or 14 competed against many boys teams, the competetive level
and the skill level was very high for many of them, and we also mingled the young ones in with them so
they could learn and become the same, it was very successful.
I don't think there is a need to say more about girls sports from our vantage point, we've been there, done
that, and enjoyed every minute of it.
When comparing the sedins or any other such player anyone wants to put 'down', there are many men's
teams who are much below any of the NHL teams, why not compare them to them, as many of those men's
teams would have had a hard time beating some of our senior women's teams.
Our girls ball teams numbered 16, with 3 travel 'rep' teams as part of that.