I made it quite clear from the OP that this was to be a discussion, you've turned it into some sort of immature little "you're wrong, I'm right" pissing contest...
The only one with their peepee hanging out, is you.
if anyone's been shuffling goalposts it would be you...
LOL, I'm sure you think so. But you don't come off as very bright, so your claim comes with a ton of grains of salt.
I've not only admitted that I was wrong (partly) on a a few points in that other thread, and repeated that here, but I've argued my case eloquently (for the most part) and given you plenty of opportunity to rebutt what I've posted...
1, You were completely wrong. 2, You didn't do it without caveats, shifting goalpost or diversion.
You've chosen not to do so, just offering opinion with nothing to back it up...
LOL, you already provided the proof that my statement was indeed fact/correct. The issue now is, you feel silly and have to do everything and anything, to save some face. Instead of just saying, "Sorry Bear, you were right".
I'd love to understand why people like you have such difficulty admitting error.
So how about you offer something by way of contribution to further the discussion or sit down and shut up while the adults discuss this issue intelligently...
Intelligent adults don't usually say things like...
Emphatic NO...it does not depend at all on the career...
NO employer has any right whatsoever of even asking for you medical records, much less forcing you to provide them...
The notion is ridiculous...
When they obviously knew absolutely nothing about the topic. And don't even get me started on the claim you joined the military, without providing a medical history.
Thanks for being such a good sport Bear!
Mauling blow hards is more of just a digit exercise regiment, rather than a sport.
Just speculating why someone who is clearly not a lawyer would find necessary to bookmark a law library...unless they're in legal trouble a lot, or a troll who likes to argue every ****ing thing that certain people say...whatever, blather on then...
If you weren't so locked into myopic thought, basing claims on assumptions, misconceptions, and your feelings, you may have considered that I just enjoy discussing law. Sadly the only two I have found to be capable of doing that at any great depth, and/or reasonably, are Niflmir and Tonington. Although ITN, back in his hay day, stretched my brain and made it both educational and entertaining.
I feel medical records are no ones business when it comes to hiring. Like Vanni says, if necessary do some observable screening. Disclosing medical records creates too much opportunity for discrimination and in my view is a violation of ones privacy.
Isn't it reasonable to discriminate with regards to certain careers?
Do we really need an epileptic flying planes? Driving trucks?
So then the rights that one should be willing to give up is commensurate with how much pay they have the opportunity to receive?
No, it should be commensurate to the risk that they may be to society at large.
I thought you read the Oakes Test and 100's of case law articles?
