Well let's see.. the only people with guns are the criminals, at least south of the border you can own a gun too and defend yourself against criminals..
You're calling Colpy a criminal?
Well let's see.. the only people with guns are the criminals, at least south of the border you can own a gun too and defend yourself against criminals..
You're calling Colpy a criminal?
Yep. Now would be a good time for these so-called community leaders to help calm everyone down instead of trying to incite something. It'll just get uglier and more divisive at this rate.
I've always thought you were more of a babbling idiot, than a talking head.There is plenty of emotional bias when the talking heads present their news.
President Obama said that if he had a son he "would look like Trayvon Martin".
A person who is not racist, a person who would prefer to see and appreciate the content of character of a person, rather than the colour of his skin would have said that if he had a son he "would BE like Trayvon Martin".
Given what's available to the public, about Mr. Martin. I think I'd pass on that.A person who is not racist, a person who would prefer to see and appreciate the content of character of a person, rather than the colour of his skin would have said that if he had a son he "would BE like Trayvon Martin".
**********should he be arrested??? Well he KILLED a kid. Seems any killing of a human being requires legal action. The courts can then decide if the killing "was justified". and on what basis?
NO
WRONG
ABSOLUTELY the antithesis of the basic premise of English Common Law.
You first must determine that a CRIME has been committed before you prosecute a man. Otherwise it is not prosecution, it is persecution.
technically, you are right of course. I do so wish this principle was followed in ALL cases... be they local, national or international.
Not a stretch to think this young man was "assassinated". Given that the US is in favor of such "justice"... this one could be one for the legal scholars ......
Let's do a what if:. what if the young man had shot and killed Zimmerman ?? In self defense of course on the grounds that Zimmerman was a threat and had been stalking him.
what do you think public opinion would be on that?? Would the principles of law that you mention appy?? There is a history of the law being used and abused to favor one or the other depending on the bias of the people doing the judging .
Colpy: lets go with your uncertainty. What factors are contributing to it?? thx.
The clash of stories:
Did Zimmerman run the kid to ground?
Did Zimmerman attack the kid?? Or did the kid attack Zimmerman??
Had Zimmerman drawn a weapon???
Did the conflict take place next to Zimmerman's car?
Was Zimmerman on the ground being beaten??
Did the police decide not to arrest, or the District Attorney (prosecution) decide not to press charges?
Too many conflicting reports, and that makes me unwilling to challenge the decision not to arrest.....
You know, black people have been afraid of white people in hoods a lot longer than whites have been afraid of blacks in hoods.