Do you mean copy-writes or people just understanding some verses differently. The RCC Bible of 325AD and the KJV1611 Edition should be the same texts exactly, both were from the Original Greek and the original Hebrew/
hhhm Got beer here but no cheesy things. I do have chili chips, though. raising a chili chip to meet your Crunchy.
Not true, the presumed original Hebrew manuscript has never been found...for all we know, the original may have been written in Greek, that would explain a lot...
How do you outlaw religion, without force?
I tried to show that I have, you attacked me for it.
You don't, and therein lies the rub...I would never advocate for force to deal with churchy folk, so I have to hope that one day they wise up of their own accord...
What a fu cking lier you are.... in this very thread....quoted more than once, you stated that you wanted religions outlawed. What drugs are you on?
I'll let you take that point up with Daniel, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abed-nego and Gabriel when you see them. I won't bother you about anything written between the two covers.Not true, the presumed original Hebrew manuscript has never been found...for all we know, the original may have been written in Greek, that would explain a lot...
I'll let you take that point up with Daniel, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abed-nego and Gabriel when you see them. I won't bother you about anything written between the two covers.
WTF are you on?? Acts gave them the ability to understand languages. Why would they send Paul into the Nations with some Hebrew scripts when the area the texts were meant for was Greece and Italy (Rome) Explain why coming to the Roman leaders with a Hebrew version of Romans would impress them when the Apostles bring it are speaking their language fluently. Perhaps you should shake off some of the old doctrine before you claim to even have one (denial is a view IMO)But show me where to find the original Hebrew manuscript of the New Testament gospels...
Are you ****ing serious??
Of course the Torah is in Hebrew...that's not what I meant and you know it...gosh!
But show me where to find the original Hebrew manuscript of the New Testament gospels......
Again - How many asses do you have?
Should be an easy question. is this another failing, cannot answer easy questions? Why is that? I mean it is clear.
Can we Tosh.0 20 sec that reply for 20 points?I have 3 asses and you can kiss them all...![]()
Oh you actually wanted an answer to this?
I have 3 asses and you can kiss them all...![]()
Nope - You have had your ass handed to you so many times this afternoon I was wondering when you would run out. Butt clearly you have not. That is why I will again hand you your ass.
ROTFLMAO
Interesting what passes for intelligent discourse on this board these days...
No, you've not handed me my ass, but you can keep trying...lol
Not forcing anyone to think like me...just forcing them to think...
See that's one of the problems I have with religion, is that it forces you to stop thinking and just accept...and for one that professes to not be religious, you seem to be caught in that trap yourself...
Free your mind brother...
Regrettably, attacks upon Christians (and vice versa) have been going on in Asia for a long time:Terrorist Attacks against Christians increase 309 in Africa Middle East and Asia - YouTube
That is three out of three.......in a discipline (science) often seen as the antithesis of belief in God.....
And it certainly belies your contention that belief destroys the ability to think
Albert Einstein was not a theist...
"It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it."Nor was he a deist...
"I am a deeply religious nonbeliever. This is a somewhat new kind of religion. I have never imputed to Nature a purpose or a goal, or anything that could be understood as anthropomorphic. What I see in Nature is a magnificent structure that we can comprehend only very imperfectly and that must fill a thinking person with a feeling of humility. This is a genuinely religious feeling that has nothing to do with mysticism. The idea of a personal God is quite alien to me and seems even naive."