What would YOU want to hear at church?

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Silence...
I was on a native reserve a while back, to celebrate their first year of sobriety as a group (the entire reserve). I was wondering around, getting a feel for the place when I saw a Catholic church. Having not been in one for many decades, I decided to poke my nose in to see what kind of feelings would come up. It was as cold as a tomb in there, it had the ambiance of a tomb, and I got the distinct impression of death being present. I made a hasty retreat. As I wondered back to the ceremonial hall, I pondered the sensation I was feeling. For me it was a confirmation that churches were not places I would find spiritually uplifting. (That is a personal feeling and not one I project on anyone else).

Back in the hall, I was greeted warmly by a large group of people (I was the only one of European ancestry there). I was there at the invitation of an old Cree spiritual elder who had helped these people get sober using traditional teachings and ceremony. The highlight of the weekend was a movie these people made where they had to portray the process they went through to get sober, which one large native fellow said was one on the hardest thing he ever had to do (he had to portray himself drunk beating up his father and mother). The movie was deemed an essential part of the healing process. I sat with these people as they quietly shed copious amounts of tears throughout the movie.

Just another small example of how spirit manifests through the silence of human feelings.
 

adopted

Electoral Member
Sep 23, 2008
168
0
16
BC
looseassociations.wordpress.com
That's the error in argument called moving the goal posts. Sin free is not the same as perfect and pretending it is invalidates everything that follows. You can't escape the conclusion that way. If we were once sin free and aren't anymore it's because we were created capable of sin. Not perfect.

(this is from Augustine, Thomas Boston, etc. and reflects the Biblical explanation of human nature: )

Pre-Fall Man: Able to sin; Able to not sin
Post-Fall Man: Able to sin; Unable to not sin
Reborn Man: Able to sin; Able to not sin
Glorified Man: Unable to sin; Able to not sin

 

bluebyrd35

Council Member
Aug 9, 2008
2,373
0
36
Ormstown.Chat.Valley
Perfect in that they were sin free and they had access to food that would have kept them alive eternally as long as they remained sinfree and the garden was there. Eve simple believed what she was told by Adam and later by Satan. Satan made the wrong choice that day, death coming to Adam and Even (and all their children) is a consequence of Satan's actions. A 'creature' who is innocent of knowing a lie exists would not have to 'question everything' when she had been given instructions to be Adam's 'helper' rather than 'instructor'. Apparently knowing about good and evil doesn't make you smarter unless the punishment Satan got back then was 'part of the plan' he had to un-throne God.

Sooo exactly where did sin or evil come from?? If all God created was perfect, how come He apparently created imperfection more than once?? Satan/Lucifer (the giver of light) challenging God's authority for instance, already proving that all was not well in God's kingdom. Why cast satan down to earth, then install his other perfect beings in the same vicinity?

Adam and Eve were God's perfect children, innocent and sin free, so why did God stick them in a garden, leave them unsupervised, after already setting satan on the loose there? Would you set your children up like that?? ie....would you leave them vulnerable to the evil next door neighbour, pervert uncle, or another sibling who was a known drug dealer?? No reasonable being would do that!! Yet we are asked to believe God would do so.

Oh, and talk about prejudiced. It seems women were never equal in God's eyes, nor for that matter any of the humans already in existence at this time.

By the way, you cannot quote the bible to prove it's authenticity. That is like quoting "The Wizard of Oz" to prove the existence of witches of the east and west.
 

Rosebud

Nominee Member
Feb 6, 2012
73
5
8
Why doesn't your Church place as much zeal in correcting the wrongs of collectives has it does in individuals.?
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
(this is from Augustine, Thomas Boston, etc. and reflects the Biblical explanation of human nature: )

Pre-Fall Man: Able to sin; Able to not sin
Post-Fall Man: Able to sin; Unable to not sin
Reborn Man: Able to sin; Able to not sin
Glorified Man: Unable to sin; Able to not sin

That's nice and neat, though redundant in two of the categories (unable to not sin certainly implies able to sin, for instance, in fact it implies compulsion to sin) but I know of no reason to think any of it's true. As Christopher Hitchens put it, it may not be said that there is no god, but it may be said that there's no reason to think there is. I think it's an evil tale made up to frighten and control people.
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
Throwing logic out the window on the first point, way to go.
You have evidence that I threw something out a window? Or is this just you claiming I have.
To get an inkling of what the bible covers you have to read it. Understanding it correctly is only slightly less important to the reading part. The accept or reject as you see fit, thos justifications do make all the differences in the world, as far as logic and sanity go. The summations you have for why you reject the texts would not be the same ones I would use to justify why I believe the 'story'.
Ah, so you have your own brand of "logic". Well, I knew that.


The cat would prefer to be dead, the butcher would also prefer it that way I'm sure. A dozer operator is said to be a 'cat-skinner', does that qualify as 'the other way'?
What are you gibbering about? It's an expression and the context I was using it in says that there's more than one way to become a good person. Yeshua is not the only way.


That 'peace and love' includes killing 2/3's of the world's population in the first few hours of His return. Those few hours are called 'great tribulation' and the 7 vials show why it has earned the name 'Great Tribulation'.
I guess you don't quite comprehend the idea of timelines. According to the Bible, Yeshua WAS all about love and compassion. This "Great Tribulation" has not happened yet. To put it more simply, "was" is different than "is to be".
God only gave Adam 1 Law, worship wasn't included, that only came as part of the exodus out of Egypt.
So? The first 4 commandments are all about YHVH and its ego.
That doesn't mean fallen angels didn't demand worship in their dealings with men prior to the flood.
So?
If anybody was slated to be toast then why is everybody convieved going to be alive and standing when the new earth is revealed? I agree that not all paths are as 'smooth' as others but they all ebventually lead to the same open door.
Here we go with the timeline thing again. YHVH massacred over 10 million people mentioned in the Bible in the past. So the Bible says there will be some 108 billion people on this "New Earth" in the future.
Either way, there's just as much evidence for all these "to bes" as there is for you growing a 9th nose.


Depends on how you take it,
Nope. If I take it to be BS, I take it to be BS.
as it is it is a one page summation of more than 13B years our time, perhaps the fact that He wrote more about other things also means those other things are 'more important' to the 'big picture', those also have to 'be studied' do they not?

Noah was about thje last one that lived to be 'almost 'a day old' if you use that 1,000 years is equal to a day when you are with God. If that worked for Enoch and Noah and Adam then the others could be the same. If 24 of 'them' were the Saints that were resurrected on the same day that Jesus was become the 24 Elders around the throne in Re:4 then at present they have been 'with God' in a way that is at least equal to any Apostle or other author in the Bible. Those same 24 are said to have thrones on earth during the 1,000 year reign. You could write Adam's age as being 0.930 days. 1 day with God would be 1.000 or 1,000 of our years. 2 days with God is written as 12.000, 3 days as 123.000 and so on for eternity. Adam and the other elders have a total of about 4,000 years of being 'gathered' before they see fire from God in Heaven eliminate Sartan and the fallen angels, the 'youngest' would be just over 1,000 years old.
Lots of "ifs". If the Bible is just a big concoction of imaginative minds, your arithmetic is a bit moot.


You would have thought one would have done the trick.
Makes me think someone was on drugs.
The fact that Moses brought up 'issue' that led to the staff eating the other ones set up by God or was that an improv by God?
What fact was this again? How much evidence is there to back up this "fact"?
If the Pharoah had those guys around because they could do those sorts of things why would he not treat Moses the way Neb treated Daniel when he proved to 'be better'? Sad to say is that God 'needed' all 7 plagues to unfold as a teaching lesson for christ and what He was going to do as part of the 'duties as a Judge'. God gave Him the 'tools' that far back, that He refrained from using them before the proper time shows that power does not corrupt Him. However there is no hesitation either once the day of authority arrives so take that for what it is.


read the incident. a strong east wind blew all night and before that Moses was 'north of that spot' and Pharoah is said to be 'south of that spot'. Ther is a narrow waterwat that connects 2 lakes, if that was 'made passable for man and beast and wagon' then would that have qualified for 'the miracle' you demand happen. The Red Sea is south of where Pharoah was, Moses and the 'slaves' could not have gotten that far south. The names are right there, there is a site called the Bible Atlas, connect the two and where are you? Takes all of 1 minute and you solve a puzzle that has stumped people fot a very long time. Words and pictures tell the whole story.


Yet science says the oceans have risen some 400ft. Have they ever verified if there was ever a snowball-earth?.
Haven't gone far enough back in time to say for sure. That last major ice-age didn't quite manage it, though.
Too bad climate prediction isn't a desktop program. However looking back to the height of the last ice-age and the extent of the ice from the north and the south and ocean levels being 400ft lower it should be possible to 'just predict' that it would be 'different' but 'along the same lines' where London is not foggy it is fully as tropical as the deepest parts of the Amazon is today with as much as 6" of rain per day. That is rainfall of Biblical proportions, pretty much exactly.
Under the 'goddidit rule' the water needed would lower the oceans all of 5 (five) feet
...... assuming there was no such thing as gravity to pull water back into the oceans back then and the planet wasn't spinning to throw everything not anchored down well-enough off into space. roflmao You come up with the funniest shyte sometimes.


The place the Bible puts us at is living under the two Laws and accepting the Government as being the 'authority' if they adhere to the limitations put on them as 'his servants' in the 'mean-time'. If the 'mean-time' could be made to work properly then a return wouldn't even be needed. Immortality is part of that 'promuse' so without that all is vapor when it comes to 'power' over 'word'. (such as the Bible being prophetic only about a coming return)
Oh, good. More "ifs". Well, if Mother Goose had it right, then there actually was a little old woman who lived in a shoe. And if Grimm bros. had it right, there was a little dood called Rumpelstiltskin.

You don't have to, there is no 'punishment from God' for being leary. There is one for being too quick to believe though, no other way to fall for a deception than to hear and not question and invesdtigate for yourself.
I do anyway. Don't need permission from any gods for that.


The fluffy parts are to show how vivid the descriptions are for the events that will play out.
....... or to just play on people's emotions.

Apply that moment in time to how vivid the description is on how the sinners in the world are gathered for punishment by Jesus. If it gives you the impression that nobody can hide from it then it has gotten you the 'whole message' for that passage, now add in 50 more passages. The 'many generations' is a reference to the 1,000 year reign whee a devestated Jerusalem become known as the Glorious City, the devestation is what happens to Satan and the fallen angels when fire from heaven sends them to the fiery lake. (little long but the amount of vivid detail combined with the plave in the overall sequence makes it a read and fully understand type of passage with no deep thinking as far as symbolism goes. Granted it does take some reading before the connection can be made so it is still time consuming on your end.
...and it would make no difference to my opinion of the Bible anyway.

Perfect in that they were sin free and they had access to food that would have kept them alive eternally as long as they remained sinfree and the garden was there. Eve simple believed what she was told by Adam and later by Satan. Satan made the wrong choice that day, death coming to Adam and Even (and all their children) is a consequence of Satan's actions. A 'creature' who is innocent of knowing a lie exists would not have to 'question everything' when she had been given instructions to be Adam's 'helper' rather than 'instructor'. Apparently knowing about good and evil doesn't make you smarter unless the punishment Satan got back then was 'part of the plan' he had to un-throne God.

We were eternal being who had not sinned, how is that flawed, in the new earth we will be sinless and immortal, how is that a change from 'the original plan'?
Well seeing as science has shown that protohominins (creatures that may or may not have been human yet)existed about 6 to 7 million years ago and had the cranial capacity of about 350 cu cm (chimps have about the same), I doubt very much that they could even figure out what sin was or had eternal lives.

You are wrong. Jesus didn't just bring a system of knowledge or a guidebook for life. He absorbed the wrath of God in his death; and he rose from the grave. You can't arrive at that some other way. If he really is who he says he is; if he really did what he said he did; then the consequences are massive, and no teaching or moral system is going to achieve what he has achieved.
You believe whatever illusions you want. You have no evidence supporting you. And plenty of people live without this Jesus in their lives and are still good people. So, I'm not wrong.

(this is from Augustine, Thomas Boston, etc. and reflects the Biblical explanation of human nature: )

Pre-Fall Man: Able to sin; Able to not sin
Post-Fall Man: Able to sin; Unable to not sin
Reborn Man: Able to sin; Able to not sin
Glorified Man: Unable to sin; Able to not sin

lol Funny stuff.

Perfect in that they were sin free and they had access to food that would have kept them alive eternally as long as they remained sinfree and the garden was there. Eve simple believed what she was told by Adam and later by Satan. Satan made the wrong choice that day, death coming to Adam and Even (and all their children) is a consequence of Satan's actions. A 'creature' who is innocent of knowing a lie exists would not have to 'question everything' when she had been given instructions to be Adam's 'helper' rather than 'instructor'. Apparently knowing about good and evil doesn't make you smarter unless the punishment Satan got back then was 'part of the plan' he had to un-throne God.

Sooo exactly where did sin or evil come from?? If all God created was perfect, how come He apparently created imperfection more than once?? Satan/Lucifer (the giver of light) challenging God's authority for instance, already proving that all was not well in God's kingdom. Why cast satan down to earth, then install his other perfect beings in the same vicinity?

Adam and Eve were God's perfect children, innocent and sin free, so why did God stick them in a garden, leave them unsupervised, after already setting satan on the loose there? Would you set your children up like that?? ie....would you leave them vulnerable to the evil next door neighbour, pervert uncle, or another sibling who was a known drug dealer?? No reasonable being would do that!! Yet we are asked to believe God would do so.

Oh, and talk about prejudiced. It seems women were never equal in God's eyes, nor for that matter any of the humans already in existence at this time.

By the way, you cannot quote the bible to prove it's authenticity. That is like quoting "The Wizard of Oz" to prove the existence of witches of the east and west.
If this god was perfect in the first place, it should have figured out how to keep a handle on this Satan creature in the first place. lol

roflmao Adopted gave me a red for this post. I guess I must have brought up too many rational points for him to handle.

No reasonable argument, Adopted?
 
Last edited:

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
roflmao Adopted gave me a red for this post. I guess I must have brought up too many rational points for him to handle.

No reasonable argument, Adopted?

I wouldn't start to worry until these nut cases start agreeing with me! :lol:
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Sorry, I don't have a lot of time tonight. But I'm not seeing much point in continuing this discussion. It's not edifying anybody, so far as I know.


Of course you don't see much point. You have very little support for YOUR point of view, and obviously from this last responce, you NEED to have others support you.
 

adopted

Electoral Member
Sep 23, 2008
168
0
16
BC
looseassociations.wordpress.com
Of course you don't see much point. You have very little support for YOUR point of view, and obviously from this last responce, you NEED to have others support you.

I don't come here looking for support. My last comment refers to my suspicion that this is not a good use of time. Time is a gift from God, you know that.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
That's the error in argument called moving the goal posts. Sin free is not the same as perfect and pretending it is invalidates everything that follows. You can't escape the conclusion that way. If we were once sin free and aren't anymore it's because we were created capable of sin. Not perfect.
In that case we are not made perfect in this world, that is a standard for the new earth where staying away fromk evil is because the Law is written on our heart rather than held in our hearing. It takes the ones alive for the 1,000 years to make the 'transition' as to how they appear to God when they first see His face.

Heb:12:23:
To the general assembly and church of the firstborn,
which are written in heaven,
and to God the Judge of all,
and to the spirits of just men made perfect,

This earth was always mean to expire so it's judgment could 'pass', it was going to fail it is just as well that it did on the first generation.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
I don't come here looking for support. My last comment refers to my suspicion that this is not a good use of time. Time is a gift from God, you know that.
Nice weasel out. Run along now. Don't say I didn't warn you this would happen. Too many people on here have functioning BS barometers.

In that case we are not made perfect in this world, that is a standard for the new earth where staying away fromk evil is because the Law is written on our heart rather than held in our hearing. It takes the ones alive for the 1,000 years to make the 'transition' as to how they appear to God when they first see His face.

Heb:12:23:
To the general assembly and church of the firstborn,
which are written in heaven,
and to God the Judge of all,
and to the spirits of just men made perfect,

This earth was always mean to expire so it's judgment could 'pass', it was going to fail it is just as well that it did on the first generation.
Sniff, Sniff! Ah, the master of BS has spoken again. You know, if you would take your nose out of that book once in a while, you might smell the roses. There is more to life than reading antiquated texts that mean nothing to anybody but an ancient goat herder in the desert. I would love to be a fly on the wall when your god tells you you squandered the life he gave you on useless endeavors such as these.
 
Last edited:

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
If this god was perfect in the first place, it should have figured out how to keep a handle on this Satan creature in the first place. lol
I'll come back to the longer part that I skilled for this one.
If God was perfect He would make a trial run before setting things in motion where a break would have different consequences had a trial run not been 'part of the plan all along'

Isa:66:22:
For as the new heavens and the new earth,
which I will make,
shall remain before me,

saith the LORD,
so shall your seed and your name remain.
 

bluebyrd35

Council Member
Aug 9, 2008
2,373
0
36
Ormstown.Chat.Valley
In that case we are not made perfect in this world, that is a standard for the new earth where staying away fromk evil is because the Law is written on our heart rather than held in our hearing. It takes the ones alive for the 1,000 years to make the 'transition' as to how they appear to God when they first see His face.

Heb:12:23:
To the general assembly and church of the firstborn,
which are written in heaven,
and to God the Judge of all,
and to the spirits of just men made perfect,

This earth was always mean to expire so it's judgment could 'pass', it was going to fail it is just as well that it did on the first generation.

LOL, well, of course, our earth, our solar system, our galaxy even the universe will eventually die. Whether it comes naturally by the sun going nova and spewing out the start of a new system elsewhere or whether it will continue for many eons as a satellite of a dark star, is the question. It may (earth) get struck by a large bit of space debris pounding earth pieces, or our sun simply collapses in on itself, who knows.

Does it matter if earth gets struck by a large enough hunk of debris, and hammered into small bits, or if the sun either goes nova and becomes a dark star? In the either scenario, I imagine then end will be come quickly. I don't imagine either scenario is in the very near future.

Ah so you do believe there is a witch of the west.......I believe the witch of the east had a house fall on her.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
Going off track a little, can anyone tell me where and when the first copy of the Bible surfaced?
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Sooo exactly where did sin or evil come from?? If all God created was perfect, how come He apparently created imperfection more than once?? Satan/Lucifer (the giver of light) challenging God's authority for instance, already proving that all was not well in God's kingdom. Why cast satan down to earth, then install his other perfect beings in the same vicinity?
Part of Law, when Law is give a 'day of judgment' and a 'period of punishment is determined' and a 'place of punishment' is created, for Angels the Laws is the one in Re:21 and the time of their Judgment is just before the Great white Throne for the men that may/may not be in hell. Once any fallen angels are in the lake the men under punishment are released as sinless men, just in time to enter the new earth as it begins to unfold.

Adam and Eve were God's perfect children, innocent and sin free, so why did God stick them in a garden, leave them unsupervised, after already setting satan on the loose there? Would you set your children up like that?? ie....would you leave them vulnerable to the evil next door neighbour, pervert uncle, or another sibling who was a known drug dealer?? No reasonable being would do that!! Yet we are asked to believe God would do so.
God completed creation, that required a day off. The same men that have lived and died are alive in the new earth so all of mankind is 'saved'. 1/3 of the fallen angels end up in the fiery lake so perhaps it was meant not to be empty. Hell is the worst men face and it is a punishment that comes with a predetermined release date.

Oh, and talk about prejudiced. It seems women were never equal in God's eyes, nor for that matter any of the humans already in existence at this time.
Equal enough that a married man and woman are called one flesh and equal enough that a man will leave his mother and father for a wife. That seems to be quite equal.

By the way, you cannot quote the bible to prove it's authenticity. That is like quoting "The Wizard of Oz" to prove the existence of witches of the east and west.
2Tm:3:16:
All scripture is given by inspiration of God,
and is profitable for doctrine,
for reproof,
for correction,
for instruction in righteousness:

Going off track a little, can anyone tell me where and when the first copy of the Bible surfaced?
I thought the RCC did that in about 323AD, it should have been the very same original texts that the 1611KJV was translated from. By 1611 the RCC had way more texts than just the Holy Bible so they tried to improve on perfection and they broke it, so to speak.
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
I wouldn't start to worry until these nut cases start agreeing with me! :lol:
Worrying? I thought it was funny.

Sorry, I don't have a lot of time tonight. But I'm not seeing much point in continuing this discussion. It's not edifying anybody, so far as I know.
And to rational people, it never will.

In that case we are not made perfect in this world, that is a standard for the new earth where staying away fromk evil is because the Law is written on our heart rather than held in our hearing. It takes the ones alive for the 1,000 years to make the 'transition' as to how they appear to God when they first see His face.

Heb:12:23:
To the general assembly and church of the firstborn,
which are written in heaven,
and to God the Judge of all,
and to the spirits of just men made perfect,

This earth was always mean to expire so it's judgment could 'pass', it was going to fail it is just as well that it did on the first generation.
This New Earth will happen when? As I mentioned already, the amount of people that have been been born so far is estimated to be about 108 billion. Other species have been dying off simply to make room for the current 7 billion. Fresh water is also dwindling faster than it is being replenished.
But maybe we'll all be ghosts and not need space or water or food. And in about 1.5 billion more years when we've all gone nuts from boredom, the planet will have lost all the water and by about another 3.5 billion years after that, the red giant sun will have cooked the planet to a crisp.

I can think of better ways to spend eternity even if it actually is possible to get past a corporeal death. Oh, hey, maybe we could all be Qs and set about the universe annoying the hell out of Klingons, Borg, Wookies, Vulcans, and Siths. It sounds just as plausible as anything from the Bible.