...and has been stated, at this point we have no proof he wouldn't have doing this to seniors had he been working in a seniors home.
Fact: They're not minors....
...and has been stated, at this point we have no proof he wouldn't have doing this to seniors had he been working in a seniors home.
To me the difference between a pedophile and sexual abuser is that a pedophile is someone who wants to believe and have others believe that he or she can't help themselves and it's not their fault. I heard the case of a woman who apparently was dissociative when she sexually abused her children, or so she claimed, and she had no recollection of it. In the case of the parent who abused me, their denial was such that their response to being confronted with the facts was to try to kill the person who did so. There's all kinds of mentalities and denial mechanisms and tactics sexual abusers have to justify and hide their actions and responsibilities. I don't think psychiatry, society or the legal system should allow themselves to be played by those tactics.
Sorry for the long post, but this is an issue that is very important to me.
Really? You replied to Karrie, about something I said, that you already conceded was child porn? Way back on page two?The part that was edited out was about child porn and your claim regarding the article. I said I missed it. After reviewing the article I realized that "child porn" were your words and not from the article there is nothing in the article about child porn. You made it up. Therefore, there was no "child porn" missed.
I haven't been talking about "the mounting evidence". I've been talking about the OP and the willingness of people to jump to conclusions. It's very possible that it will be determined that this guy is a pedophile. In post #36 I stated...
...so I think the odds are pretty good he probably is a pedophile.
No, you make up stuff about whole communities of people you don't like.Unlike you though, I'm not willing to make stuff up about the case just to **** on the perp.
Maybe you could point out the previous post, in the part I replied to.LOL... Only you (and Dasleeper) could call quoting previous posts "back pedaling"
I haven't been talking about "the mounting evidence". I've been talking about the OP and the willingness of people to jump to conclusions. It's very possible that it will be determined that this guy is a pedophile. In post #36 I stated...
...so I think the odds are pretty good he probably is a pedophile. Unlike you though, I'm not willing to make stuff up about the case just to **** on the perp.
Maybe you could point out the previous post, in the part I replied to.
So, are you ready to come clean about admitting to Karrie you missed the part about the pics?
What studies have found pedophiles are responsible for 95% of sexual abuse? It's odd because most sexual abuse is committed by relatives of the child. So did the studies find that most pedophiles are also sexually attracted to incest? Or are most sexual abusers sexually and psychologically aroused by victimizing children, just as rapists are sexually and psychologically aroused by victimizing their victims?
My fault, I didn't break it down for you enough. Since you backpeddle so often, i figured you'd know what I was referring to.No problem.
I haven't been talking about "the mounting evidence". I've been talking about the OP and the willingness of people to jump to conclusions.
What does that claim have to do with your reply to karrie's post, about the part of the article regarding the pics in his cache?I missed the part about pornographic pics but that is probably because they were a figment of your imagination.
No. That would be sexual assault.
Pedophilia involves prepubescent kids. Pedophiles are not responsible for 95% of all sexual assaults.
some studies indicate upwards of 95% of child molestation cases, involving
preteens, involve pedophilia
Pedophilia involves prepubescent kids. Pedophiles are not responsible for 95% of all sexual assaults.
Pedophilia IS sexual assault on children so I don't quite see your point!
No it is not. That is my point. Pedophilia is a psychiatric disorder characterized by a primary sexual interest in prepubescent children. One does not have to molest children in order to be a pedophile and not everyone that molests children are pedophiles. You would know that if you read the entire thread.
I was commenting on what you had posted:
No, they are 100% responsible for all sexual assaults they commit.
Possibly. You and I are not equipped to make that determination though.
...walks like a duck.
...quacks like a duck.
...flies like a duck.
Must be dog shyte....