Obama to propose $1.5 trillion in new tax revenue

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
If you do not live or work in the United States, what does it matter to you who or who is not to blame. If you can find the individual who actually started this mess, then we can have a good old fashioned hanging. Playing the blame or hindsight game does absolutely no got. What is out best course of action now? OK, making everyone pay their fair share of taxes is a good start.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
If you do not live or work in the United States, what does it matter to you who or who is not to blame. If you can find the individual who actually started this mess, then we can have a good old fashioned hanging. Playing the blame or hindsight game does absolutely no got. What is out best course of action now? OK, making everyone pay their fair share of taxes is a good start.


What is a "fair share of taxes"? There should be a limit to what one person can be assessed. Perhaps anyone who is paying $100,000 a year should be left alone after that.

 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
I'll look around and see if I can find some info from the US gvt stats offices regarding the tax contributions of the different demographics. If it's anything like Canada, the top 10% income earners pay around 40% of all of the taxes (personal contributions).

That is about how it is here.

Regardless, the fact remains that a substantial % of Americans do not pay taxes at all.. That said, I can not fathom the comment that the "rich" aren't paying their "fair share" when 1/2 of the population aren't paying taxes at all.

But they need more stuff! The rich have stuff... why can't they have just as much stuff as the rich? Why should the rich have all the cool stuff? It's... It's... it's just not... fair.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
The rich are the rich, and the poor are the poor and the middle class are the middle class.


And the $4 trillion debt is the $4 trillion debt.


And in 2016 China's GDP will surpass the U.S. GDP, while we continue to bicker about the above.



 
Last edited:

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
As it stands, the USA is their biggest customer, so the Chinese fortunes are directly tied to the health of the US economy.

I keep hearing about how well the Chinese economy is doing.. and how poorly the Americans are doing.. so that doesn't really check out cap.
 
Last edited:

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
I should have worded my comment differently... You have to bear in mind that the 2 nations are (to a degree) mirror images of each other. It would be an over exaggeration to state that the Chinese economy is doing poorly, but it has slowed down a bit due to the lower demands placed by the US consumer... That said, you won't see anywhere close to the same crisis levels in China simply because the country has no debt - hell, they have been loaning the US lots of $$ over the last 20 years, not to mention buying up resources in Canada, Africa, South America, etc..

These guys have lots of cash in hand to weather any storm.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Well that's just it.

While we're using our GDP to pay off our debt, they'll be shooting up revenues.




 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
We've seen similar trends in the past with West Germany (back when they existed) and Japan. Both nations went on global spending sprees and lead the pack on a GDP basis... Only time will tell if the Chinese go down that same cyclical path.

Personally, the easiest way for me to get a handle on which nation is at the forefront is as easy as a trip to Banff. Which ever language is predominant on the touristy shops (especially the jewelery places) is the top dog of the day.
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
[/FONT]

What is a "fair share of taxes"? There should be a limit to what one person can be assessed. Perhaps anyone who is paying $100,000 a year should be left alone after that.



Starting at say $35 - 50,000+ per year a straight 15-20%, no deductions (people like Buffet would pay a tax based upon what they make like everyone else). I am in favor of the flat tax idea. For those making below $35-$50 thousand 10% or less would be fair. Of course all the little extra taxes the government charges us will have to stop.