Obama urges future Palestinian state be based on '67 borders

[YukonJack]

According to polls, 78% of American Jews financially supported and voted for Obama.

Whether a Jew is a Zionist or not, Obama's policy about Israel's returning to the 1967 borders, signals the end of Israel and the extermination of non-Muslims in that area.

African-Americans and guilt-ridden whites voting for Obama is understandable.

But JEWS???

 

[petros]

Are you saying that Muslims are peaceful and no threat to anyone?

Muslims have saved my life more than once. I'm going to see one on Tuesday for an Rx refill. I hope she doesn't switch it and try to kill me because I'm part Jew, blued eyed/grey eyed and white as a ghost?

 

[CDNBear]

Muslims have saved my life more than once. I'm going to see one on Monday for an Rx refill. I hope she doesn't switch it and try to kill me bI'm part Jew and blued eyed and white as a ghost.

Wow, you can take posts out of context, cool.

 

[petros]

Wow, you can take posts out of context, cool.

You fears and hatred sure get out of hand at times Bear.

 

[CDNBear]

You fears and hatred sure get out of hand at times Bear.

And you don't take hints well.

Or are you really unaware of the context of that string of commentary?

 

[petros]

I've been following and comprehending all of it just fine thank you very much.

 

[CDNBear]

I've been following and comprehending all of it just fine thank you very much.

Your present course of commentary, would indicate the contrary.

Give it another shot and let me know when you clue in. Or you could just ask, and I could clear it up for you.

 

[petros]

Uh huh.

 

[CDNBear]

Uh huh.

Ya, that's about what I thought you'd say.

 

[petros]

Did ya? Did it hurt?

 

[CDNBear]

More from the cubby school of debate...

Post #1430403 - Re: Obama urges future Palestinian state be based on '67 borders Bad CUBert

Post #1430615 - Re: Obama urges future Palestinian state be based on '67 borders Bad CUBert
Post #1430618 - Re: Obama urges future Palestinian state be based on '67 borders Bad CUBert

Did ya? Did it hurt?

Probably not as much as realizing you were way off base.

 

[petros]

Off base of what? Watching the 89th time trying to be prevented? I have no problem with that at all but It can be done without being an asshole Bear.

You go off about freedom of expression but as long as it what you want expressed then you turn into a ****ing asshole and kill a thread.

 

[PoliticalNick]

Are you saying that Muslims are peaceful and no threat to anyone?

Just as peaceful and non-threatening as americans. I see it as a tit-for-tat situation and the US started it. Would you be peaceful and non-threatening if I punched you in the head a few times?

Do you sit on the crapper with your laptop, staring into a mirror?

No, do you?

You're the only one between the two of us, that still doesn't grasp, the Preach can only be guilty, if you acknowledge Muslims are prone to violence.

Wrong, you don't grasp that they are no more prone to violence than anyone else. They may be pushed to violence more often by the actions of the west but not more prone to it. If you want to keep you negative stereotype of Muslims go ahead but don't try to project it on me.

 

[DaSleeper]

Does someone have a link where we have had riots and people killed in the streets because someone in Iran or other middle east countries has burned a bible?????


Loosing a hockey game doesn't count....

 

[petros]

Loosing a hockey game doesn't count....

The Stanley is the Holy Grail.

 

[CDNBear]

Off base of what?

Your silly accusations.

I have no problem with that at all but It can be done without being an asshole Bear.

Hey, if you don't like it, don't make stupid allegations, about something well out of context.

You go off about freedom of expression but as long as it what you want expressed then you turn into a ****ing asshole and kill a thread.

Bullsh!t. I'm not the one that made the silly, unsubstantiated, out of context accusations. That would be you.

Now if you want to understand the context of my commentary, read on.

Just as peaceful and non-threatening as americans.

Cool, so the Pastor had no need to worry about blow back from burning the Quran. Thanx for admitting that, finally.

Wrong, you don't grasp that they are no more prone to violence than anyone else.

As you keep saying. So the Pastor had no worries. You already established that.

They may be pushed to violence more often by the actions of the west but not more prone to it.

Like saying something about your wife and kids?

If you want to keep you negative stereotype of Muslims go ahead but don't try to project it on me.

They're not my stereotypes, they're yours. They have to be, for your opinion of the pastors actions to be legitimate.

 

[petros]

Perfect example of what keeps people away from these boards...

 

[CDNBear]

Perfect example.

Ya, I know, it's sometimes hard to admit you made an error. It won't hurt to admit it openly.

Go on, you can do it.

Post #1430774 - Re: Obama urges future Palestinian state be based on '67 borders Bad CUBert


Ya I can see how that would be seen as bad by the likes of you.

 

[ironsides]

This could take up several pages and most of it would be a repeat from other threads over. Being declared a terrorist organization was a step in silencing them, one of many through a joint effort of the US and Israel. This is not any different than the US telling Egyptians the one to put in charge was the one right below their corrupt leader. Why not just zip their lips as Gaza is not part of their country?


This more interesting as it is worth reviewing, in 1967 having the high ground was important as ground forces were in use then, in this day and age of being able to shoot over the horizon and be accurate or shoot from the air via drones or heavy bombers.

What is the current status of the economic aspect of that area? It would appear to be 600Sq mi of what would be called productive agricultural land for the most part. If population safety was a prime concern they why are they also making a economic gain off that same land with (I assume) 0% of the profits going to Syria as it is their land. Being paid rent would show them (and the world) that security was #1 rather than just stealing some productive land for their own material gain.

The Golan Heights now belong to Israel, there is no question of them ever returning it to Syria willingly or by UN resolution. So in answer to your question all the produce will be used to support Israel and who ever personally owns the land now. The Golan was always questionable territory. Like the whole Mid-East countries/empires came and went. Today Israel is the big boy in town.

The Golan Heights: Geography, Geology and History

 

[PoliticalNick]

The Golan Heights now belong to Israel, there is no question of them ever returning it to Syria willingly or by UN resolution. So in answer to your question all the produce will be used to support Israel and who ever personally owns the land now. The Golan was always questionable territory. Like the whole Mid-East countries/empires came and went. Today Israel is the big boy in town.

The Golan Heights: Geography, Geology and History

Go crawl back into your zionist hole! Attitudes like yours are the cause of these problems.