I am going to write something which will have my poor father rotating in heaven .... he was a labor organizer....
I honestly believe organizing teachers was a bad move intellectually because although it levels the benefit field, it takes competition out of the equation and all teachers must teach at the same level with each other regardless of personal supremacy in their field of work.
Now teachers can complete coursework for students - whether the students "get it" or not - and it has no effect on their job security. Once the work has been taught and covered and tested, that's it.
The students are being taught by rote and not all learning is at the same level - in a class of thirty students there could be five or six different modalities of learning and repetition is key - but teachers are rarely allowed to segregate the learning abilities because it is another 'rule' that students are not to be pointed out for their ability or lack thereof.
Bang on Curio- Unions do bring everyone down to the lowest common denominator. Memorizing is good for certain learning processes like citing poetry or the times tables, but there is a limit to how much any person can remember so if you are going to learn any amount of involved stuff you have to understand the principles. Like while I could never remember formulas I could generally derive formulas for processes I understood the relationships.