Couple abort twin boys in quest to have a daughter

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
There are thousands of people right now doing ultrasounds and trying to determine sex so they can make abortion decisions based on sex selection. Almost none of them are people who go through IVF. However one obscure couple who used IVF make headlines, and of course it will bring out the anti-IVF naysayers. It really has nothing to do with IVF.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
hmm... I hadn't really seen anyone come out against IVF, especially since the article states pretty clearly that they were turned down. Thus my confusion as to how it was a red herring as anyone here was discussing it.
 

eh1eh

Blah Blah Blah
Aug 31, 2006
10,749
103
48
Under a Lone Palm
There are thousands of people right now doing ultrasounds and trying to determine sex so they can make abortion decisions based on sex selection. Almost none of them are people who go through IVF. However one obscure couple who used IVF make headlines, and of course it will bring out the anti-IVF naysayers. It really has nothing to do with IVF.


What is it like to go through IVF treatment?
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
hmm... I hadn't really seen anyone come out against IVF, especially since the article states pretty clearly that they were turned down. Thus my confusion as to how it was a red herring as anyone here was discussing it.
I'm just throwing my 2-cents in because there is so much misinformation about IVF there are many who will read this and relate what they are doing to the big-bad world of science. I'm sure it wasn't news until an IVF clinic was approached. No mention of everyone doing abortions in the fertile world over sex selection. The inclusion of assisted reproduction in the story now makes it a news event, even though, like you said, they were turned away.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
I'm just throwing my 2-cents in because there is so much misinformation about IVF there are many who will read this and relate what they are doing to the big-bad world of science. I'm sure it wasn't news until an IVF clinic was approached. No mention of everyone doing abortions in the fertile world over sex selection. The inclusion of assisted reproduction in the story now makes it a news event, even though, like you said, they were turned away.

True, had they simply carried on getting pregnant naturally and aborting, it never would have hit the news. There's no saying they won't still do that of course. Frankly, they're a lesson in the importance of psychiatric care following a loss.
 

Nuggler

kind and gentle
Feb 27, 2006
11,596
141
63
Backwater, Ontario.
8O''''An Australian pioneer in IVF, Gab Kovacs, agreed. "I can't see how it could possibly harm anyone," he said.'''

The aborted twin boys might have had a different opinion.
 

Ariadne

Council Member
Aug 7, 2006
2,432
8
38
I think the sons the couple already has will have some pretty serious questions at some point in the future. If the parents didn't want the last two boys, and only want a daughter, did they really want the first three sons? I think the sons will look back on this and wonder whether their parents wanted them, regardless of what the parents have to say about it.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
For someone who is both left and right depending on the issue this is nothing short
of a disgrace. I am pro choice but this does not even fit into that category. The
thought of sacrificing children just because they are not your first choice is just too
low to comprehend. There is usually a serious reason for such an action and this
is not one of those reasons

Jumping the gun a little aren't we? There weren't any children to be sacrificed in the first place, so I don't know what you're talking about.

Leading by your emotions and biased ethics to dictate what others should and shouldn't do in regards to their own business is what's a disgrace.

Praxius. While I understand what you mean from a very baseline logical argument, the other side, the side that decides if people are worthy of kids or not, disagrees wholeheartedly. Mainly because anyone who is willing to go to such lengths to design their family is suspect in their ability to love their child no matter what life may bring, such as brain damage at birth, crippling infections as an infant, disfiguring car accidents, etc. Once you've placed such a huge qualifier on your willingness to raise a child, essentially declaring that half the possible babies (and even two ACTUAL fetuses) are not good enough for your purposes, then your willingness to raise future childrem well, raise them lovingly, despite flaws that may arise, is highly in question.

Of course I don't see it that way. They already have three children, all boys mind you..... there is nothing in the report stating that she is unwilling to raise those children, or that those children are not being loved and treated well, or that they're not "Good Enough" for her. The only reason some in here are making such claims are based on assumption and personal bias.

I have known a number of women over the years who have had a number of children, all of one gender..... be that all boys or all girls. But from growing up, or from wanting to share their own personal experiences and pass them on to a child, like what they went through as a boy or a girl growing up..... that relation is missing for some. I imagine everybody has known someone in their lives who said they always wished for a boy or always wished for a girl, whom already have children....... but would you say they love their existing children any less because they wish for a particular gender??

No, most would just see them as feeling like they're missing something in their lives and their family.... that it is not complete.

That's all I see this situation as. Sure, they aborted two twin fetuses that were boys and whom might have led productive and healthy lives..... but we all know that not everybody considers fetuses as a living breathing human being and are no different then a faulty organ or a parasite, or something else that's expendable.

And for the most part, the law views them almost the same way, as basic human rights and the classification of a human being to obtain those rights do not apply until you are born an take your first breath, regardless of how far along or developed the fetus may be....... so beyond someone's own personal religious or personal beliefs, no wrong was done and them viewing the situation as "a matter of fact" as they do with little emotional attachment to a couple of fetuses shouldn't be any surprise to anybody here.

the only difference between this situation and many other abortions is:

#1 - it was the abortion of two fetuses rather then one.

and

#2 - they openly voiced their personal reasons for why they had an abortion of those two fetuses.

if they never spoke out and if they never attempted to fight for the rights of selecting the gender of their future children, none of us would even be talking about this.... and it would have just been another abortion statistic on paper due to Dr/Patient confidentiality.

I am by no means a staunch Pro-Life Advocate(I believe in cases where the mother is in danger if she carries to term, as well as with rape, that the woman should be allowed to have an abortion if she wants), but this just isn't right. They should not be allowed to have this IVF procedure ever. If they wanted a daughter that badly, why the hell couldn't they have just adopted? Stuff like this just boggles my mind.

Simple and harsh answer to that, is that in reality, not everybody views an adopted child the same way they'd view their biological child. Some have no problem at all with adoption..... but some do..... just like some have no problem with abortion, while others do.

I want to add a couple of things.

1. I wonder what their three sons think of all this? If I was one of the sons, I couldn't help but think "That could have been me had I not been born when I was.".
Personally speaking, I couldn't care less..... both my parents made sure neither of them could have children after I was born after having three children...... how about the "What-If" where perhaps my parents decided to do that after my brother was born, thus I was never born?

I still couldn't care less, simple because 1 - it never happened that way and 2 - even if it did, I sure as hell wouldn't be around to bitch about it, would I?

What's the difference between my hypothetical situation and yours?

Not much

2. If they are successful with getting a daughter, I wonder what she would think of this happening when she gets older(as make no mistake, she WILL find out from someone)?
Who's to say she'd grow up being a pro-lifer?

Why not continue with the what-if's and speculations and ask how much it screws up kids to learn that they had an older brother or sister who died at a young age and they never met?

I personally would think it was interesting, but it wouldn't have much affect on my life, anymore then being told about my great grandmother..... there's no attachment, no connection...... and you'd probably have more connection to your imaginary friend then you would a sibling you never met.

But since these are all what-if's and hypotheticals, we're just spinning our wheels here and accomplishing nothing except to perhaps try and hit a few readers with more emotional spin.

I know of one who has 6 boys and wants a daughter. Not sure why but that goal drives her to produce more kids.

Exactly, because they want someone they can share their past experiences with better.

Say they saved a bunch of their own toys from growing up, or loved going fishing with their father, or doing specific things with their mother that your bothers wouldn't give two craps about doing..... or vice versa..... some people have parts of their own childhood that they truly loved and enjoyed, remember seeing the happiness they saw in their father or mother's eyes and want to have that again...... but their daughter doesn't care to play hockey or sports, or their son doesn't care to go to the farm and play with the horses.

It's like how christmas just dies off as you grow older, but when you have your own kids, you see the joy they get from it and it brings it all back to you.

Or it's like how when some men and/or women get older and their chances of having a child of their own diminishes (due to working all the time, no steady relationship, medical reasons, etc.) they start to go a little crazy and feel their lives are not complete...... they really want a child.... so badly, that some even go so far as to either continue to have one child after another, or worse...... abduct someone else's child.

Expand on that, and you have people so adamant in having at least one child of a specific gender, that they'll go to the limits that this couple has.

Should they be forced to "Seek Help" in order to think like some people in here do?

Why should they when a very simple and easy solution exists that could make everybody happy??

We're not all the same, we all don't think the same way, but that doesn't mean some of us who think differently don't love their children any more or less then you do..... or the next person.

And don't forget, yes.... there are many out there who couldn't care less what the gender of their children are..... I'm one of them...... there are many out there who most certainly want at least one child....... and there are many out there who couldn't give a crap about having children period.

We are not all alike..... we do not all have the same priorities in life and we should not all be forced to live our lives the exact same way as the next person when it comes to making and raising Your Own family.

And when you attempt to restrict people in what they can and can not do in regards to the children they bring into the world (how many, what gender, how spaced apart they are from one another, how old you're allowed to be before you're too old, etc.) You will end up with people who will either

A - seek out abortions or

B - continue to have piles of kids until they get the one they want or

C - just don't care and are happy with what they got/get.

Many of my above examples are not directly the same compared to one another and the situations revolving around them are also different..... but the mentality that exists behind many of the decisions is the same.

were my parents in the wrong for getting snipped and clipped because I'll never know what it's like to have a younger brother or sister or simply because they interrupted the "natural course" of things?

That's for them to decide..... as for me, I couldn't care less because it was their life and as far as I'm concerned, they could have simply chose to have no kids at all and my brother, sister and I would have never existed.

What's the diff?

That's what I don't get. So what does that say about her youngest son? That he's not good enough for her, he will never live up to her expectations? That he can never be what she wanted him to be?

Oh come on now people.... you're looking way too far into this and pulling out assumptions based on crap.

It doesn't say a damn thing about her youngest son..... for all you and I know, she loves him just as much as any of her other children...... gee sorry, last I checked, since I'm a guy, it wouldn't make a whole lot of sense for me to go looking for prom dresses with my mom, or planning out my wedding with my mom, and my sister probably wouldn't enjoy all the war stuff and video games my dad and I do.......

be a little realistic here will ya?

As a male or female, there are simply some things you and I just can't do...... or at least, want to do...... and those things are sometimes important to our parents.

Go get engaged and then tell your mom she's not allowed to help you plan it and see what that does to her....... or go tell your dad that you don't want him to help you learn how to drive a standard or shoot a gun or go hunting...... or camping.

My wife once asked me how I felt that we would only have daughters, and I told her that made no difference to me, children are what they are, and want them to be happy and successful, and they'll be loved. That's it.

I have no idea why any parent would need a son vs a daughter. What exactly do you plan to do with / to your children that you require a specific gender?
See above...... while I hold a similar stance as you and probably won't have an issue with whatever gender my children come out as.... at this stage I don't know how I would really react when it does occur.

I would like to have at least a boy and a girl..... but I believe I could live with just one child, or two/three children of the same gender..... but I'm only speculating because I am not at that stage yet to truly know.

Your wife asked you, but typically us guys are not as attached to such things as women are..... I'm not trying to be sexist, it's just the way most of us tick....... did you bother to ask your wife how she would feel if you only had boys? Did she think about the things she would miss out on by not having at least one daughter? Do you think your boys would be all that happy to bring their mom along with them to pick out tuxes for their weddings? Do you think it would be the same thing??

It doesn't affect all women, but it does affect enough, whom at least want one daughter to sort of pass down their own legacy of how they were raised, as it just doesn't translate the same way with boys.... and for some men, that is equally true.

I am reluctantly pro-choice in that abortion isn't right by me and I would definitely argue against it - but it's not me who has to live with the consequences either. Murdering two boys just so one could have a girl is just that: Murder. i don't give a damn what legislation supports their deed. Tailor families is a bit over the top in my book.

:roll: It's not murder.... get over it already.

You can only imagine what kind of parents they would make. Willing to kill their children if they don't match the spec sheet. It's criminally insane!

They Are parents...... are there any records stating they "killed" any of their current/existing/living children???

WTF is wrong with people that they can't even debate a simple topic without jumping off the deep end due to emotions and blowing things so far out of proportion... that's what's insane.

8O''''An Australian pioneer in IVF, Gab Kovacs, agreed. "I can't see how it could possibly harm anyone," he said.'''

The aborted twin boys might have had a different opinion.

Really?

How about you ask them?

Oh wait, they were obliterated, never mind...... in fact, they probably weren't even at the stage of development to fathom what was going on, let alone that they existed in the first place.

A new born baby can barely make out shapes and sounds, let alone give you a straight answer on if they need to crap...... what the hell makes you think a couple of fetuses could form an opinion?

yet another baseless, emotional argument.

I think the sons the couple already has will have some pretty serious questions at some point in the future. If the parents didn't want the last two boys, and only want a daughter, did they really want the first three sons? I think the sons will look back on this and wonder whether their parents wanted them, regardless of what the parents have to say about it.

Oh well.... show me one person who ever had a perfect childhood with perfect parents.

I know my parents weren't perfect, I also know they fuct up a few times too...... and I know I'll probably end up doing the same, just as you will.... just like your parents did...... just like every other parent out there.

And if someone does come back and seriously claims their parents were perfect and their upbringing was perfect..... I'd say they're delusional.

None of us are perfect, we all make mistakes...... in fact, some of us were mistakes..... at least accidents or not planned...... I know myself and my siblings weren't really planned, which is why my parents ended up being married in the first place, why they made sure they had no more after me, and why they divorced later on in life......

That's not to say my parents didn't love us or that our childhood was a complete and miserable hell..... it simply wasn't perfect and sometimes sh*t happens.

Point being:

I'm sure we all had some tough questions for our parents at one time or another.... regardless of what our parents did or didn't do, regardless of what they might have screwed up or didn't..... they still loved us for who we are/were and did the best they could.

I cut my parents some slack simply because I know it will soon be my turn and I know I'm sure as hell ain't going to get it all right the first time around...... and I can only hope my children in the future will have understanding like I have... that we're all human.
 
Last edited:

Chev

Electoral Member
Feb 10, 2009
374
2
18
Alberta
There are thousands of people right now doing ultrasounds and trying to determine sex so they can make abortion decisions based on sex selection. Almost none of them are people who go through IVF. However one obscure couple who used IVF make headlines, and of course it will bring out the anti-IVF naysayers. It really has nothing to do with IVF.
I don't know that I would agree thousands of people doing ultrasound to determine sex to abort. Pregnant people I know want to know the sex to be prepared with the 'proper' colour clothes, paint for nursery, etc. I never did..
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
This says it all right there.

Lick me with that empty argument.

Oh.... so because I don't have children yet, my opinion isn't as valid as yours?

Guess what genius?

The couple in the original report had three children already and their opinion is still different from yours, so how about you bite me?

Face it, you can't formulate any sort of decent argument to counter what I have already said and on top of that, you're just pissed off that I (someone who doesn't have kids) makes more sense then you..... so you jump to the typical "you don't have kids, so you don't know what you're talking about"..... Sometimes people need a perspective from outside to gain a little common sense again so their over-protective parenting issues don't continually cloud their judgment to the point of sounding like some red-neck cross burner who jumps when they hear "Terr'ist"

I don't have a vagina, but I still know how it works, and I still know what many women experience and go through..... how?

I take the damn time to listen to people, their experiences, what they go through and I study the human condition without trivializing them due to not being exactly like me and how I live or think....... I don't need to know exactly how painful something is to know it's painful..... I don't need to shoot myself in the head to know it's not a healthy thing to do...... I don't need to get up on a stage and sing a tune to know it can be stressful for some people to do and that it's not easy.

so blow your self righteousness out your ass.
 
Last edited:

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
You don't make real sense Praxius. You have a cold clinical logic about it, but that's not the same as making sense. While I hesitate to say it because I don't think your view is less for not having children, I think your view will be changed by having children. Human life can't be addressed simply in cold clinical logic. You may be patting yourself on the back, and I for one may be unable to counter your argument, but it's out of pity, not out of any respect for your view.
 

Chev

Electoral Member
Feb 10, 2009
374
2
18
Alberta
karrie said; ... "Frankly, they're a lesson in the importance of psychiatric care following a loss"... That is exactly right!
'to replace the infant daughter they recently lost'... they are in serious need of help.... I feel sorry for their sons and any other children they end up with.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
nope..... I feel that anyone that considers a "fetus" not "human" to be mentally unstable. At this point in time I'm quite happy that you have no kids...and yes... as far as I'm concerned, your opinion of anything concerning children is worthless.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
nope..... I feel that anyone that considers a "fetus" not "human" to be mentally unstable. At this point in time I'm quite happy that you have no kids...and yes... as far as I'm concerned, your opinion of anything concerning children is worthless.

They are definitely misguided, Gerry.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
nope..... I feel that anyone that considers a "fetus" not "human" to be mentally unstable.

ffs, do we have to go over all this again because people have a short attention span or simply can't read properly?

#1 - Show me where I said a Fetus is not "Human"
I'll save you the time and remind you that I said "Human Being"...... the fetus in question is a "Human Fetus" but it is not a "Human Being" because it is a "Human Being in Development"..... ie: a god damn Fetus.

#2 - What the hell does the above have to do with the quote of mine you decided to attack?

If I'm mentally unstable, then you're mentally incompetent...... at least if I'm unstable, I still know wtf I'm talking about.

At this point in time I'm quite happy that you have no kids...and yes... as far as I'm concerned, your opinion of anything concerning children is worthless.

Good for you..... since you haven't even formulated any useful argument for debate thus far...... and I assume you have the parent card backing you up to allow you to know wtf you're talking about...... that says more about your opinion being worthless then it does mine..... considering one would think with all that wonderful parenting knowledge you have stored away in your little nugget you call a brain, you would have been able to easily refute everything I have said thus far with ease.

Yet you continually avoid the points i have made and continue to try and make petty insults and snipes my way while not addressing anything mentioned in the debate.

You're quite happy I don't have kids?

Well I feel sorry for yours.

........ Now.... shall we continue this childish crap or are you willing to grow up a bit and actually contribute something to this debate?
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
there's nothing to continue, you have no experience, and you support the murder of children through abortion. You can try and make yourself feel better by continuing to use the term "fetus" but that still doesn't change the fact that what you are saying is that is is ok to kill a living human baby.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
You don't make real sense Praxius. You have a cold clinical logic about it, but that's not the same as making sense.

I don't see what my perspective in logic has to do with my points being wrong, other then not meshing with some people's emotional and personal bias in this topic.

You may claim what I say doesn't make any sense, but most of what I am reading in here doesn't make much sense either, especially many of the knee-jerk solutions some people are coming up with in here.

Yes, I agree that after the loss of any child, regardless of the situation or age, parents should seek some form of help to work through their loss..... but where does it say they didn't already do this and who's to say they were not of sound mind when they made this decision to abort?

Obviously the abortion went ahead and the doctor..... the professional & someone who knows more about what's going on then any of us..... didn't refuse their decision..... no laws were broken.

While I hesitate to say it because I don't think your view is less for not having children, I think your view will be changed by having children.
I agree, it will change..... how, remains to be seen..... and since this couple already went through having 4 children (1 died) already, if my view is indeed somehow less or just simply different, theirs is equal to any other parent's views and arguments....... which matches similar to my own, thus my view isn't too far off the mark.

Human life can't be addressed simply in cold clinical logic. You may be patting yourself on the back, and I for one may be unable to counter your argument, but it's out of pity, not out of any respect for your view.
I don't pat myself on the back, I merely speak what makes sense to me.... I never expect people to jump to my view and follow my lead..... unlike some in these forums (and no, I'm not talking about you) But I do not require your pity.

I don't require pity and I don't require knee-jerk reactions based on mere emotions....... I only require understanding of a situation...... understanding from everybody...... to clarify, when i say understanding, I mean understanding what's being discussed and understanding both sides of a debate/argument.

I have explained my side of the argument as best I can...... I have understood their side of the argument and why they did what they did, the mentality is nothing new and they are not the first parents in the world to have gender preferences....... however when it comes to the arguments I have seen in here like they need help, they shouldn't be allowed to have kids, their children must live in hell, their parents must hate them, they're sick, etc..... I fail to understand or see the explanations backing those arguments up.

I don't even see anybody in here trying to explain how they came to those conclusions...... which I figured would be easy to explain.

And if it's all summed up again with "only parents would understand" ~ Well clearly these parents and many others in the world don't & see it differently, just as I do........ and if that's summed up again with "They need help" ~ Then again..... that's not much of an argument, because I could call anybody who doesn't agree with me without explanation crazy or claim they need help too..... but that's just a cop out.

there's nothing to continue, you have no experience, and you support the murder of children through abortion.

They're not children.... get over it already..... until you start seeing parents swinging their fetuses in swing sets in the playground or tossing them a ball in the field.... they're not children...... go get some education on what a fetus is.

Here, I'll help you along:

fetus
- The unborn offspring of a mammal at the later stages of its development, especially a human from eight weeks after fertilization to its birth. In a fetus, all major body organs are present.

children
- A person between birth and puberty.

Frig, being a parent, one would think you'd know the difference by now...... grade 7's know this stuff.

You can try and make yourself feel better by continuing to use the term "fetus" but that still doesn't change the fact that what you are saying is that is is ok to kill a living human baby.
And you can try and make yourself feel better by not picking up a book and learning something, but:

baby- A very young child; an infant.

Here, I'll go one step further.......

infant- A child in the earliest period of life, especially before he or she can walk.

Since there's no point in going into what "Life" is, as indeed a fetus is considered alive, much like a liver or a tomato, let's look at Human Being:

human being- a member of any of the races of Homo sapiens; person; man, woman, or child

^ Funny, I don't see a Human Fetus listed as a Human Being.

C'mon gerryh, get yer sh*t together.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
yup, and at one time in human history, a child was not considered human until it reached it's first birthday.

You seem to be under the impression that because society/law/scientific definitions say something is some way that it has to be the truth. Guess what, it's wrong. Just like the idea that a baby isn't human until it reaches it's first birthday was wrong.