Earth destroying?
Are you insane?
Do you live near Toronto?
I can arrange something if you wish.
AGW Denial, The Greatest Scam in History?
- Thread starter Avro
- Start date
Earth destroying?
Are you insane?
Do you live near Toronto?
I can arrange something if you wish.
Petros Methodology for Retrieving Facts
Step#1: Insult the other person
Step#2: Ask them to provide rational discourse
Step#1: Insult the other person
Step#2: Ask them to provide rational discourse
Do you live near Toronto?
I can get you in to meet some climatologists....one well known.
I'm guessing that Avro will launch into some diatribe about conspiracies and coincidence.
You're dreaming if you'll get anything rational from any of the Truthers.... Proof is something that they are sadly lacking in, but they have something better.. faith
I suppose you have some observations to back up your claims.
Better yet, since petros thinks the Iraq war was a cosnpiracy perhaps he can give us some observations about that....he was there no?
You two make a nice pair...which one is the side kick?
Neither. They are both completely independent thinkers, free from the thought control of our totalitarian government. You can tell by how convincingly they reveal the UN/IPCC/Obama socialist plot for world domination.
The IPCC is a review of the science...and the modelling experiments that groups perform for the IPCC are stored in the CMIP3 archive. The verification is peer review:
CMIP3 - Google Scholar
YouTube - Experts Debate Climate Change Science, Policy#!
Debate enthusiasts will love this long, but worthy video showing Texas A&M atmospheric scientist Andy Dessler mopping the floor with his increasingly out-of-touch colleague from MIT, Dick Lindzen.
The fact of Dessler's victory is a value judgment that you may not trust without watching the video yourself. But speaking of value judgments, Dessler got off a great shot during his rebuttal, in which he commented on how often Lindzen had said that climate change presents "no cause for alarm."
That, Dessler pointed out, is also a value judgment - not a scientific finding, adding:
"Before the lecture, he (Prof. Lindzen) was smoking. That's a risk. He's decided that's a risk he's willing to take. But not everybody would take that risk, so when he says there's no cause for concern, he's giving you his value judgment."
Proceeding beyond the degree to which Lindzen has bad breath - as well as bad judgment - the lecture hosts at the University of Virginia School of Law jumped in with two policy presenters, Jonathan Cannon, making all kinds of sense, and Jason Johnston bending over backwards to argue that because economists can't accurately put a cost on the coming climate armageddon, we shouldn't bother taking out any insurance to prevent it. (Pass that man a pack of Camels. It'll make it easier for him to blow smoke in the future.)
Debate enthusiasts will love this long, but worthy video showing Texas A&M atmospheric scientist Andy Dessler mopping the floor with his increasingly out-of-touch colleague from MIT, Dick Lindzen.
The fact of Dessler's victory is a value judgment that you may not trust without watching the video yourself. But speaking of value judgments, Dessler got off a great shot during his rebuttal, in which he commented on how often Lindzen had said that climate change presents "no cause for alarm."
That, Dessler pointed out, is also a value judgment - not a scientific finding, adding:
"Before the lecture, he (Prof. Lindzen) was smoking. That's a risk. He's decided that's a risk he's willing to take. But not everybody would take that risk, so when he says there's no cause for concern, he's giving you his value judgment."
Proceeding beyond the degree to which Lindzen has bad breath - as well as bad judgment - the lecture hosts at the University of Virginia School of Law jumped in with two policy presenters, Jonathan Cannon, making all kinds of sense, and Jason Johnston bending over backwards to argue that because economists can't accurately put a cost on the coming climate armageddon, we shouldn't bother taking out any insurance to prevent it. (Pass that man a pack of Camels. It'll make it easier for him to blow smoke in the future.)
Last edited:
