And suddenly attempting some radical change in the way we all live is not only impossible, but pointless because even if it was possible to accomplish enough change to make a difference, that difference will come way too late...... that is, if the Globalwarmongers predictions are actually true.
All that would happen is we'd run into that brick wall a little slower, but the end results will remain the exact same.
If Man-Made Global Warming is indeed true, then we should have been making radical changes on a larger scale then we are today, back in the mid/late 80's, which back then, all of this nightmare flooding and destruction was supposed to happen at the turn of the century, noticing most of the effects by 1997....... back in the early 90's it was predicted that New York and other coast lines would be under several metres of ocean, which included where I live by the late 90's...... which scared the crap out of me as a 10 year old kid watching these reports on TV...... yet their predicted timeline never happened, the ocean on the island most of my mom's side of the family lives is at the same level it was since as far back as I can remember.
Yet now all of the exact same predictions are being made all over again, except this time, instead of it being in the next 15-20 years, it's in the next 50-100 years.
Fooled me once.
Less and less species that we're used to seeing..... have you taken a recent look at the number of new species being discovered in the last few years?
Do a google search and you'll see new ape species, butterflies, sea creatures and a bunch more species have been discovered popping their heads out for a look around.... the planet adapts in a multitude of ways and when one species disappears, usually another takes its place.
Look at all the dinosaurs before us...... or all the various animals that existed during the Ice Age...... eventually species will either evolve, adapt or die..... it's only a matter of time, regardless if we're the direct result of them dying off or if it was just nature..... we're a part of nature after all, thus our own actions, whatever they may be, are just as much a part of nature as anything else.
I doubt that very much..... there's so many predictions and so-called scientific calculations created by all sorts of limited simulations, that I could come up with my own scientific explanation on how to turn oxygen into split pea soup.
How did life survive, let alone, be created on this planet back when most of the earth was covered by volcanoes and cracks in the Earth's surface exposing greater amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere?
If you look at various Glacier Ice Core data graphs, you'll also notice that back around the time of the Roman Empire's peak, global temperatures were far warmer then they are today..... yet there was no industrialization back then..... no pollution compared to the amount we have today...... so how does one explain that?
And if you take the ice core data and go back a couple hundred thousand years, you'll also notice that there is a global pattern to temperatures increasing and then decreasing...... currently we're on the upswing...... yet when you look at graphs and charts supporting "Global Warming" you'll notice how the majority of them only go back as far as the late 1800's, around the time of the industrial revolution and then go forward towards today, claiming that there's a link that the temps increased due to use going industrial.
Example of a typical Global Warming Graph:
Wow!..... We're all going to die by the looks of that!!!
Oh but wait:
^ Notice the pattern and how we're perfectly lined up for the next increase?
Or how about this one:
And let's also not forget about the impact hurricanes and tropical storms have on temperatures both in the air and in the ocean...... yet Globalwarmongers continually use Hurricanes as one of their boogy men, claiming that with warmer temps, come bigger and more destructive hurricanes and flooding....... of course bigger and more powerful hurricanes will come with warmer temps...... but after one season of powerful hurricanes, there is usually 2-3 years of minor or very few hurricanes to report...... why?
Because the ocean waters were cooled down, not just by the previous hurricanes, but from a collective of environmental chain reactions that come with Hurricanes.
I personally look forward to experiencing hurricanes where I live and the last one that whacked Nova Scotia couldn't have come sooner..... we were going through something like a two week heat wave of 32+ Celsius with humidity well into the 40's.
Then Earl came through and by the following day and ever since right to today, it's been cool around here..... in the mid teens to low 20's...... instantly after Earl passed.
The last Hurricane of any significance that came before Earl towards us, was Juan back in 2003, which came after two seriously hot summers that were totally unbearable..... fans and air conditioners were sold out in much of the Maritimes...... then we got smacked by Juan, and Juan did a lot of damage....... but it cooled down after that, followed by White Juan, which was a massive snow storm that hit us that following winter and bitter cold temps.
Since then, I honestly haven't complained about the heat in the summer up until this past summer..... and then Earl hit..... which was far weaker then Juan, but still did its job of cooling the place down.
There are a slew of other factors I could list off or talk about that Globalwarmongers either avoid or dismiss because they're too ignorant to look at any information different then from what they parrot...... but I think I posted enough at this stage.
The point being is that whatever is going to happen, it's going to happen regardless of what we do, regardless if we directly created the problem or not....... or if there even is a problem in the first place.
And no matter what happens in the future, life will go on on this planet, in one form or another.
Not much of a counter argument...... one is stating their opinion based on logical reviewing of given information...... the other is all up on his high horse claiming to be an expert and for all to unquestionably follow what he commands...... yet also was caught fudging the information to suit his objectives and clearly shown multiple times a total bias and un-scientific perspective on such a matter as what we're talking about.
Walter has more credibility in my books then Hansen.
I also believe I heard him quoted as saying anybody who questions or doesn't accept global warming should face jail time....... quite the "Scientific" attitude wouldn't you say?
That's certainly one way to force people to believe what you believe..... and it's also a great way to make sure your so-called "Scientific Data" doesn't actually get tested or reviewed.
And wasn't he the same idiot who ran around with claims of Global Cooling back in the 70's?
He doesn't seem to be able to make up his mind and stick to one story very well. I suppose that has to do with how much money is filling his pocket and who's telling him to say what.
